Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT)

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 343-353

  Nukada, Yuko ^a   Ashikaga, Takao ^b   Sakaguchi, Hitoshi ^a   Sono, Sakiko ^b   Mugita, Nanae ^a   Hirota, Morihiko ^b   Miyazawa, Masaaki ^a   Ito, Yuichi ^a   Sasa, Hitoshi ^b   Nishiyama, Naohiro ^a  

^a KAO CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b SHISEIDO RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

CD54; CD86; chemical class; h CLAT; HRIPT; skin sensitization; THP 1

Indexed keywords

1 CHLORO 2,4 DINITROBENZENE; 1,4 BENZOQUINONE; 2 AMINOPHENOL; 2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; 2 NITRO 1,4 PHENYLENEDIAMINE; 5 CHLORO 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; ANILINE; BENZYLIDENEACETONE; CHLOROBENZENE; CINNAMALDEHYDE; CITRAL; DICHROMATE POTASSIUM; DIPHENCYPRONE; DODECYL GALLATE; EUGENOL; FORMALDEHYDE; GALLIC ACID PROPYL ESTER; GLUTARALDEHYDE; GLYOXAL; HYDROQUINONE; HYDROXYCITRONELLAL; MALEIC ANHYDRIDE; OCTANOIC ACID; OXAZOLONE; PHTHALIC ACID DIETHYL ESTER; RESORCINOL; THIRAM; TOSYLCHLORAMIDE SODIUM; TRIMELLITIC ANHYDRIDE;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CELL LINE ACTIVATION TEST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

ALLERGENS; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANTIGENS, CD86; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR ADHESION MOLECULE-1; MONOCYTES; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SKIN;

EID: 81155152595     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01952.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Botham P A, Basketter D A, Maurer T, Mueller D, Potokar M, Bontinck W J., Skin sensitization-a critical review of predictive test methods in animal and man. Food Chem Toxicol 1991: 29: 275-286.
2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. No. 429: Skin Sensitisation: The Local Lymph Node Assay: Paris, (OECD), 2002.
3. EU. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products ('7th Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive'). Off J Eur Union 2003: L66: 26-35.
4. Basketter D A, Casati S, Gerberick G F, Griem P, Philips B, Worth A., Skin sensitisation. Altern Lab Anim 2005: 33: 83-103. (Pubitemid 41039557)
5. Aeby P, Ashikaga T, Bessou-Touya S et al., Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: colipa's research and method development program. Toxicol In Vitro 2010: 24: 1465-1473.
6. Ashikaga T, Yoshida Y, Hirota M et al., Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines: the human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). I. Optimization of the h-CLAT protocol. Toxicol In Vitro 2006: 20: 767-773. (Pubitemid 43948877)
7. Sakaguchi H, Ashikaga T, Miyazawa M et al., Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT. Toxicol In Vitro 2006: 20: 774-784. (Pubitemid 43948878)
8. Ashikaga T, Sakaguchi H, Sono S et al., A comparative evaluation of in vitro skin sensitisation tests: the human cell-line activation test (h-CLAT) versus the local lymph node assay (LLNA). Altern Lab Anim 2010: 38: 275-284.
9. Ashikaga T, Sakaguchi H, Okamoto K et al., Assessment of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) for skin sensitization; result of the first Japanase inter-laboratory study. AATEX 2008: 13: 27-35.
10. Sakaguchi H, Ryan C, Ovigne J M, Schroeder K R, Ashikaga T., Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials. Toxicol In Vitro 2010: 24: 1810-1820.
11. Kosaka N, Inaba H, Okamoto K et al., The Japanese ring study of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) for predicting skin sensitization potential (5th Report): a study for evaluating preservative skin sensitization potential using h-CLAT. AATEX 2010: 15: 71-80.
12. Okamoto K, Kato Y, Kosaka N et al., The Japanese ring study of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) for predicting skin sensitization potential (6th Report): a study for evaluating oxidative hair dye sensitization potential using h-CLAT. AATEX 2010: 15: 81-88.
13. Sono S, Mizuno M, Kosaka N et al., The Japanese ring study of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) for predicting skin sensitization potential (7th Report): evaluation of volatile, poorly soluble fragrance materials. AATEX 2010: 15: 89-96.
14. Basketter D A, Kimber I., Predictive tests for irritants and allergens and their use in quantitative risk assessment. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepoittevin P-J, (eds): Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer, 2006:pp. 179-187.
15. Basketter D A, Andersen K E, Liden C, Van Loveren H, Boman A, Kimber I, Alanko K, Berggren E., Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 39-43. (Pubitemid 40293090)
16. Basketter D A, Evans P, Gerberick G F, Kimber I., Factors affecting thresholds in allergic contact dermatitis: safety and regulatory considerations. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47: 1-6.
17. Schneider K, Akkan Z., Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2004: 39: 245-255. (Pubitemid 38596763)
18. Haneke K E, Tice R R, Carson B L, Margolin B H, Stokes W S., ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the evaluation of alternative toxicological methods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2001: 34: 274-286. (Pubitemid 34093729)
19. Basketter D A, Clapp C, Jefferies D, Safford B, Ryan C A, Gerberick F, Dearman R J, Kimber I., Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 260-267. (Pubitemid 41719275)
20. Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, Kimber I, Dearman R J, Lea L J, Basketter D A., Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Am J Contact Dermat 2000: 11: 3-18. (Pubitemid 30143868)
21. Gerberick G F, Robinson M K, Ryan C A, Dearman R J, Kimber I, Basketter D A, Wright Z, Marks J G., Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am J Contact Dermat 2001: 12: 156-161. (Pubitemid 32862092)
22. Becker D, Kolde G, Reske K, Knop J., An in vitro test for endocytotic activation of murine epidermal Langerhans cells under the influence of contact allergens. J Immunol Methods 1994: 10: 195-204.
23. Sakaguchi H, Ashikaga T, Miyazawa M et al., The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test-human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). Cell Biol Toxicol 2009: 25: 109-126.
24. NIH. The Murine Local Lymph node Assay: A Test Method for Assessing the Allergic Contact Dermatitis Potential of Chemicals/Compounds: Bethesda, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Publication Number 99-4494, 1999.
25. Vidovic R, Kansky A., Contact dermatitis in workers processing polyvinyl chloride plastics. Dermatosen 1985: 33: 104-105. (Pubitemid 15043688)
26. Oliwiecki S, Beck M H, Chalmers R J., Contact dermatitis from spectacle frames and hearing aid containing diethyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 264-265.
27. Smith C K, Hotchkiss S A., Xenobiotics as skin sensitizers: metabolic activation and detoxication, and protein-binding mechanisms. Allergic Contact Dermatitis: London, Taylor and Francis, 2001: pp. 119-205.
28. Basketter D A, Bremmer J N, Buckley P et al., Pathology considerations for, and subsequent risk assessment of, chemicals identified as immunosuppressive in routine toxicology. Food Chem Toxicol 1995: 33: 1051-1056.
29. Kligman A M., The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J Invest Dermatol 1966: 47: 393-409.
30. Johansen J D, Lepoittevin J-P, Basketter D A, MacFadden J, Sosted H., Allergens of special interest. In: Contact Dermatitis, 4th edition, Frosch P J, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P, (eds): Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2006: pp. 507-536.
31. Basketter D A, Sanders D, Jowsey I R., The skin sensitization potential of resorcinol: experience with the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 196-200. (Pubitemid 46365224)
32. Kern P S, Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, Kimber I, Aptula A, Basketter D A., Local lymph node data for the evaluation of skin sensitization alternatives: a second compilation. Dermatitis 2010: 21: 8-32.
33. Rao K S, Betso J E, Olson K J., A collection of guinea pig sensitization test results-grouped by chemical class. Drug Chem Toxicol 1981: 4: 331-351. (Pubitemid 12115776)
34. Gerberick G F, Vassallo J D, Foertsch L M, Price B B, Chaney J G, Lepoittevin J P., Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach. Toxicol Sci 2007: 97: 417-427. (Pubitemid 47073857)
35. Emter R, Ellis G, Natsch A., Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010: 245: 281-290.