Sexual dimorphism and bilateral asymmetry of syrinx and vocal tract in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 272, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1527-1536

  Prince, Ben ^a   Riede, Tobias ^a   Goller, Franz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioacoustics; Labia; Vocal control; Vocal fold

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STARLING; TRACHEA; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; SEX FACTORS; STARLINGS; TRACHEA; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

PASSERI; STURNIDAE; STURNUS VULGARIS; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

EID: 81155152399     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: 10974687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.11007     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bermúdez-Cuamatzin E, Ríos-Chelén AA, Gil D, Macías Garcia C. 2011. Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol Lett 7: 36-38.
2. Bernard DJ, Castro JM, Ball GF. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in the volume of song control nuclei in European Starlings: Assessment by a Nissl stain and autoradiography for muscarinic cholinergic receptors. J Comp Neurol 334: 559-570.
3. Cooke B, Hegstrom CD, Villeneuve LS, Breedlove SM. 1998. Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain: Principles and mechanisms. Front Neuroendocrin 19: 323-362.
4. Daley M, Goller F. 2004. Tracheal length changes during zebra finch song and their possible role in upper vocal tract filtering. J Neurobiol 59: 319-330.
5. Eens M. 1997. Understanding the complex song of the European starling: An integrated ethological approach. Adv Study Beh 26: 355-434.
6. Fitch T. 1999. Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds via tracheal elongation: Comparative and theoretical analysis. J Zool 248: 31-48.
7. Fletcher N, Riede T, Suthers RA. 2006. Model for vocalization by a bird with distensible vocal cavity and open beak. JAcoust Soc Am 119: 1005-1011.
8. Frey R, Volodin I, Volodina E. 2007. A nose that roars: Anatomical specializations and behavioural features of rutting male saiga. J Anat 211: 717-736.
9. Gentner TQ, Hulse SH. 2000. Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. Anim Behav 59: 443-458.
10. Goller F, Suthers RA. 1995. Implications for lateralization of bird song from unilateral gating of bilateral motor patterns. Nature 373: 63-66.
11. Goller F, Suthers RA 1996a. Role of syringeal muscles on gating airflow and sound production in singing brown thrashers. J Neurophysiol 75: 867-876.
12. Goller F, Suthers RA 1996b. Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song. J Neurophysiol 76: 287-300.
13. Goller F, Larsen ON. 1997. A new mechanism of sound generation in songbirds. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94: 14787-14791.
14. Goller F, Suthers RA. 1999. Bilaterally symmetrical respiratory acitivity during lateralized birdsong. J Neurobiol 41: 513-523.
15. Goller F, Cooper B. 2004. Peripheral motor dynamics of song production in the zebra finch. Annal New York Acad Sci 1016: 130-152.
16. Goller F, Mallinckrodt MJ, Torti SD. 2004. Beak gape dynamics during song in the zebra Wnch. J Neurobiol 59: 289-303
17. Gray SD, Titze IR, Alipour F, Hammond TH. 2000. Biomechanical and histologic observations of vocal fold fibrous proteins. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109: 77-85.
18. Hoese WJ, Podos J, Boetticher NC, Nowicki S. 2000. Vocal tract function in birdsong production: Experimental manipulation of beak movements. J Exp Biol 203: 1845-1855
19. Jensen KK, Cooper BG, Larsen ON, Goller F. 2007. Songbirds use pulse tone register in two voices to generate low-frequency sound. Proc R Soc B 274: 2703-2710.
20. Jensen KK, Zollinger SA, Childress S, Suthers RA. 2008. Anatomy and vibration dynamics of the sound-producing medial labia in songbird syrinxes. Conference abstract, Acoustic Communication by Animals. Second International Conference. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University. p. 106.
21. Luine V, Nottebohm F, Harding C, McEwen BS. 1980. Androgen affects cholinergic enzymes in syringeal motor neurons and muscle. Brain Res 192: 89-107.
22. López-Rull I, Gil D. 2009. Elevated testosterone levels affect female breeding success and yolk androgen deposition in a passerine bird. Behav Proc 82: 312-318.
23. Luther D, Baptista L. 2010. Urban noise and cultural evolution of bird songs. Proc Royal Soc B 277: 469-473.
24. MacDougall JD, Elder GCB, Sale DG, Moroz JR, Sutton JR. 1980. Effects of strength training and immobilization on human muscle fibres. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 43: 25-34.
25. Miller EH, Williams J, Jamieson SE, Gilchrist HG, Mallory ML. 2007. Allometry, bilateral asymmetry and sexual differences in the vocal tract of common eiders Somateria mollissima and king eiders S. spectabilis. J Avian Biol 38: 224-233.
26. Nottebohm F, Arnold AP. 1976. Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of songbird brain. Science 194: 211-213.
27. O'Bryant EL, Wade J. 1999. Sexual dimorphisms in a neuromuscular system regulating courtship in the green anole lizard: Effects of season and androgen treatment. J Neurobiol 40: 202-213.
28. Ohm V, Snelderwaard PC, ten Cate C, Beckers GJL. 2010. Vocal tract articulation in zebra finches. PLoS ONE 5: e11923.
29. Pavlova E, Pinxten R, Eens M. 2005. Female song in European starlings: Sex differences, complexity, and composition. The Condor 107: 559-569.
30. Pinxten R, de Ridder E, Arckens L, Darras VM, Eens M. 2007. Plasma testosterone levels of male European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) during the breeding cycle and in relation to song and paternal care. Behavior 144: 393-410.
31. Podos J, Southall JA, Rossi-Santos MR. 2004. Vocal mechanics in Darwin's finches: Correlation of beak gape and song frequency. J Exp Biol 207: 607-619.
32. Reby D, McComb K. 2003. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: Acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Beh 65: 519-530.
33. Riede T, Suthers RA, Fletcher NH, Blevins WE. 2006. Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 5543-5548.
34. Riede T, Tokuda IT, Munger JB, Thompson SL. 2008. Mammalian laryngeal air sacs add variability to the vocal tract impedance: Physical and computational modeling. J Acoust Soc Am 124: 634-647.
35. Riede T, Suthers RA. 2009. Vocal tract motor patterns and resonance during constant frequency song: The white-throated sparrow. J Comp Physiol A 195: 183-192.
36. Riede T, Goller F. 2010a. Functional morphology of the sound generating labia in the syrinx of two songbird species. J Anatomy 216: 23-36.
37. Riede T, Goller F. 2010b. Peripheral mechanisms for vocal production in birds - differences and similarities to human speech and singing. Brain Language 115: 69-80.
38. Riede T, Fisher J, Goller F. 2010. Sexual dimorphism of the zebra finch syrinx indicates adaptation for high fundamental frequencies in males. PLoS One 5: e11368.
39. Riters LV, Teague DP. 2003. The volumes of song control nuclei, HVC and lMAN, relate to differential behavioral responses of female European starlings to male songs produced within and outside of the breeding season. Brain Research 978: 91-98.
40. Suthers RA. 1990. Contributions to birdsong from the left and right sides of the intact syrinx. Nature 347: 473-477.
41. Suthers RA, Goller F. 1997. Motor correlates of vocal diversity in songbirds. In: Nolan V, Jr, Ketterson E, andThompson CF, editors. Current Ornithology. New York: Plenum Press. pp 235-288.
42. Suthers RA, Goller F, Pytte C. 1999. The neuromuscular control of birdsong. Phil Trans Royal Soc London B 354: 927-939.
43. Suthers RA, Zollinger SA. 2004. Producing song: The vocal apparatus. Ann NY Acad Sci 1016: 109-129.
44. Suthers RA, Wild JM, Kaplan G. 2011. Mechanisms of song production in the Australian magpie. J Comp Physiol A 197: 45-59.
45. Tang YP, Wade J. 2009. Sexual differentiation of the zebra finch song system: Potential roles for estradiol and ribosomal proteins L17 and L37. Dev Neurobiol 69: 462-75.
46. Uchida AM, Meyers RA, Cooper BG, Goller F. 2010. Fibre architecture and song activation rates of syringeal muscles are not lateralized in the European starling. J Exp Biol 213: 1069-1078.
47. Veney SL, Wade J. 2004. Steroid receptors in the adult zebra finch syrinx: A sex difference in androgen receptor mRNA, minimal expression of estrogen receptor a and aromatase. Gen Comp Endocrinol 136: 192-199.
48. Veney SL, Wade J. 2005. Post-hatching syrinx development in the zebra finch: An analysis of androgen receptor, aromatase, estrogen receptor α and estrogen receptor β mRNAs. J Comp Physiol A 191: 97-104.
49. Wade J, Buhlman L. 2000. Lateralization and effects of adult androgen in a sexually dimorphic neuromuscular system controlling song in zebra finches. J Comp Neurol 426: 154-164.
50. Wade J, Buhlman L, Swender D. 2002. Post-hatching hormonal modulation of a sexually dimorphic neuromuscular system controlling song in zebra finches. Brain Res 929: 191-201.
51. Warner RW. 1972. The anatomy of the syrinx in passerine birds. J Zool Lond 168: 381-393.
52. Westneat MW, Long J, John H, Hoese W, Nowicki S. 1993. Kinematics of birdsong: Functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. J Exp Biol 182: 147-171.
53. Zann RA. 1996. Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Zollinger SA, Riede T, Suthers RA. 2008. Two-voice complexity from a single side of the syrinx in northern mockingbird mimus polyglottos vocalizations. J Exp Biol 211: 1978-1991.
55. Zollinger SA, Suthers RA. 2004. Motor mechanisms of a vocal mimic: Implications for birdsong production. Proc R Soc Lond B271:483-491.