Comparison of joint line position changes after primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed using the navigation-assisted measured gap resection or gap balancing techniques

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2027-2032

  Lee, Han Jun ^a   Lee, Jae Sung ^a   Jung, Ho Joong ^a   Song, Kwang Sup ^a   Yang, Jae Jun ^a   Park, Chi Woo ^a  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Joint line position; Measured gap resection technique; Navigation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 81155134819     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1468-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüing C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 68-682.
2. Bellemans J (2004) Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter? Knee 11: 3-5.
3. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V, Giannini S (2008) Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90: 765-771.
4. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo S, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic TKA implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20: 618-626.
5. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20: 282-288.
6. Donnelly W, Crawford R, Rimmington T, Whitehouse S, Whitting K (2004) Effect of knee navigation on coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(Suppl IV): 475.
7. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39: 175-191.
8. Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with a posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68: 1035-1040.
9. Haaker R, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433: 152-159.
10. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13-14.
11. Jung YB, Lee HJ, Jung HJ, Song KS, Lee JS, Yang JJ (2009) Comparison of the radiological results between fluoroscopy-assisted and navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17: 286-292.
12. Kawamura H, Bourne RB (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6: 248-252.
13. Laskin RS (2002) Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404: 169-171.
14. Malghem J, Maldague B (1989) Depth insufficiency of the proximal trochlear groove on lateral radiographs of the knee: relation to patellar dislocation. Radiology 170: 507-510.
15. Mason M, Belisle A, Bonutti P, Kolisek FR, Malkani A, Masini M (2006) An accurate and reproducible method for locating the joint line during a revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21: 1147-1153.
16. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J (1999) Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367: 165-171.
17. Porteous AJ, Hassaballa MA, Newman JH (2008) Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 90: 879-884.
18. Selvarajah E, Hooper G (2009) Restoration of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24: 1099-1102.
19. Singerman R, Davy DT, Goldberg VM (1994) Effects of patella alta and patella infera on patellofemoral contact forces. J Biomech 27: 1059-1065.
20. Singerman R, Heiple KG, Davy DT, Goldberg VM (1995) Effect of tibial component position on patellar strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10: 651-656.
21. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 830-835.
22. Ten Ham AM, Wymenga AB, Jacobs WC (2005) The use of the knee joint-line balancer to control patella position in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 12: 89-92.
23. Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Rani N, Del Piccolo N (2010) Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18: 1304-1310.
24. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, White SE, Milliano MT (1991) Influence of prosthetic joint line position on knee kinematics and patellar position. J Arthroplasty 6: 169-177.