The five and seven factors personality models: Differences and similitude between the TCI-R, NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC

Spanish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 659-666

  Aluja, Anton ^a   Blanch, Angel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

NEO FFI R; Personality; TCI R; ZKPQ 50 CC

Indexed keywords

EID: 81155125067     PISSN: 11387416     EISSN: 19882904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.14     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aluja, A., García, O., & García, L. F. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality throught the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713-725. doi:10.1016/SO191-8869(01) 00186-6
2. Aluja, A., Garcia, O., & García, L. F. (2003). Relationships among extraversion, openness to experience, and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 671-680. doi:10.1016/SO 191-8869(02)00244-1 (Pubitemid 36831771)
3. Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Rossier, J., & García, L. F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591-604. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.014 (Pubitemid 40019369)
4. Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-P): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 416-431. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.497406
5. Aluja, A., Rossier, J., García, L. F., Angleitner, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2006). A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-CC) adapted to English, French, German, and Spanish languages. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 619-628. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.03. 001 (Pubitemid 44028713)
6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
8. Blanch, A., & Aluja, A. (2009). Validation study of the Spanish Version of the Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire (CCTF). Spanish Journal of Psychology. 12(2), 746-755.
9. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. New York, NY: Sage.
10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit In K. Bollen and J. S. Long (eds.). Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). London: SAGE.
11. Cloninger, C. R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric Developments, 3, 167-226. (Pubitemid 17216108)
12. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573-588. (Pubitemid 17082099)
13. Cloninger, C. R., & Svrakic, D. M. (1997). Integrative psychobiological approach to psychiatric assessment and treatment. Psychiatry, 60, 120-141. (Pubitemid 27332596)
14. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975-990. (Pubitemid 23361478)
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New Jersey, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor-inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17. De Fruyt, F., Van De Wiele, L., & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger'spsychobiological model of Temperament and Character and the Five-Factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 441-452.
18. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41. 020190.002221
19. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality, 16, 5 or 3?- Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
20. Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). Four ways five factor are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90237-J
21. Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). A replay to Costa and McCrae. P or A and C-the role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 867-868. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90003-8
22. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985) Personality and Individual Differences. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
23. Farmer, F., & Goldberg, L. R. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the revised temperament and character inventory (TCI-R) and de TCI-140. Psychological Assessment, 20, 281-291. doi:10.1037/aOO 12934
24. Garcia, L. F., Aluja, A., Garcia, O., & Cuevas, L. (2005). Is openness to experience an independent personality dimension? convergent and discriminant validity of the openness domain and its NEO-PI-R facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 132-138. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.132
25. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler, Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": the Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216
27. Gutierrez-Zotes, J. A., Bayón, C, Montserrat, C, Valero, J., Labad, A., Cloninger, C. R., & Fernandez-Aranda, F. (2004). Temperament and Character Inventory Revised (TCI-R). Standardization and normative data in a general population sample. Actos Españolas de Psiquiatria, 32, 8-15. (Pubitemid 38365643)
28. Joireman, J., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2004). The Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Origin, development, and validity of a measure to assess an alternative Five-Factor Model of personality. In R. M. Stelmack (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 49-64). New York, NY: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/B978-008044209-9/50005-1
29. Kaiser, H. F. (1961). A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors'. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 14, 1-2.
30. Maitland, S. B., Nyberg, L., Bäckman, L., Nilson, L. G, & Adolftson, R. (2009). On the structure of personality: Are there separate temperament and character factors? Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 180-184. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.023
31. McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project (2005). Universal features of personality traits from observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547 (Pubitemid 40328311)
32. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 587-597. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85) 90008-X
33. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-l (Pubitemid 38037806)
34. Norman, W. T. (1967). 2800 personality trait descriptors: normative operating characteristics for a university population. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan, Department of Psychology.
35. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180. doi:10.1207/sl5327906mbr2502-4
36. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
37. Tupes, E. C, & Christal, R. C. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (Tech. Rep. No. ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: US Air Force.
38. Zuckerman, M. (2002). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factorial model. In B. de Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 377-396). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
39. Zuckerman, M. (2008). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An operational definition of the Alternative Five Factorial Model of Personality. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 219-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
40. Zuckerman, M., & Cloninger, C. R. (1996). Relationships between Cloninger's, Zuckerman's, and Eysenck's dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 283-285. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00042-6 (Pubitemid 126167552)
41. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Teta, P., Joireman, J., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models of personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757
42. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991). Five (or three) robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929-941. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90182-B