Is openness to experience an independent personality dimension?: Convergent and discriminant validity of the openness domain and its NEO-PI-R facets

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 132-138

  García, Luis F ^a   Aluja, Anton ^a   García, Óscar ^b   Cuevas, Lara ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Actions; EPQ RS; Esthetics; Fantasy; Feelings; Ideas; NEO PI R; Openness to experience; SSS V; Values; ZKPQ III R

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247359184     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.132     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aluja A., García O., García L.F. A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 33:713-725.
2. Aluja A., García O., García L.F. Relationships between extraversion, openness to experience, and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 35:671-680.
3. Aluja A., García O., García L.F. Replicability of the three, four, and five Zuckerman's personality super-factors: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences 2004, 36:1093-1108.
4. Ashton M.C., Lee K., Vernon P.A., Jang K.L. Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality 2000, 34:198-207.
5. Cattell R.B. Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action 1987, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
6. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 1992, 6:653-665.
7. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. NEO-PI-R. Professional manual 1992, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc, Odessa, FL.
8. Eysenck H.J. Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences 1992, 13:667-673.
9. Eysenck H.J., Eysenck M.W. Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach 1985, Plenum Press, New York.
10. Eysenck H.J., Eysenck S.B.G. Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) and short scale (EPQ-RS) 1997, TEA Ediciones, Madrid.
11. Goff M., Ackerman P.L. Personality-intelligence relations: Assessing typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology 1992, 84:537-552.
12. Goldberg L.R. The development of markers for the Big-Five structure. Psychological Assessment 1992, 4:26-42.
13. McCrae R.R. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:1258-1265.
14. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 1985, 6:587-597.
15. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Personality in adulthood 1990, Guilford, New York.
16. Norman W.T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963, 66:574-583.
17. Pérez J., Torrubia R. Fiabilidad y validez de la versión española de la Escala de Búsqueda de Sensaciones (forma V). [Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Sensation Seeking scale (form V)]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología 1986, 18:7-22.
18. Romero E., Luengo M.A., Gómez-Fraguela J.A., Sobral J. La estructura de los rasgos de personalidad en adolescentes: El Modelo de Cinco Factores y los cinco alternativos. [The structure of personality traits in adolescents: The Five-Factor Model and the alternative five]. Psicothema 2002, 14:134-143.
19. Tupes E.C., Christal R.E. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality 1992, 60:225-251. Reprinted from USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61-97, 1961, Lackland Air Force Base, TX: U. S. Air Force.
20. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal 1979, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
22. Zuckerman M., Kuhlman D.M., Joireman J., Teta P., Kraft M. A comparison of three structural models of personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:757-768.