How an uncertain cue modulates subsequent monetary outcome evaluation: An ERP study

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 505, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 200-204

  Xu, Qing ^a,b   Shen, Qiang ^a,b   Chen, Pengshuai ^a,b   Ma, Qingguo ^a,b   Sun, Dian ^a,b   Pan, Yannan ^a,b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cue; Event related potential; Outcome evaluation; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTIVATION; NERVE CELL; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AFFECT; CUES; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; REWARD; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81055156572     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Amodio D.M. Coordinated roles of motivation and perception in the regulation of intergroup responses: frontal cortical asymmetry effects on the P2 event-related potential and behavior. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2010, 22:2609-2617.
2. Bach D.R., Seymour B., Dolan R.J. Neural activity associated with the passive prediction of ambiguity and risk for aversive events. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:1648-1656.
3. Bellebaum C., Kobza S., Thiele S., Daum I. It was not MY fault: event-related brain potentials in active and observational learning from feedback. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2874-2883.
4. Bellebaum C., Polezzi D., Daum I. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3343-3350.
5. Camerer C., Weber M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 1992, 5:325-370.
6. Carretie L., Martin-Loeches M., Hinojosa J.A., Mercado F. Emotion and attention interaction studied through event-related potentials. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2001, 13:1109-1128.
7. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 1961, 75:643-669.
8. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:2279-2282.
9. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Res. 2002, 109:679-709.
10. Hsu M., Bhatt M., Adolphs R., Tranel D., Camerer C.F. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 2005, 310:1680-1683.
11. Huettel S.A., Stowe C.J., Gordon E.M., Warner B.T., Platt M.L. Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron 2006, 49:765-775.
12. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am. Psychol. 1984, 39:341-350.
13. Ma Q., Shen Q., Xu Q., Li D., Shu L., Weber B. Empathic responses to others' gains and losses: an electrophysiological investigation. NeuroImage 2011, 54:2472-2480.
14. Miltner W.H.R., Braun C.H., Coles M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 1997, 9:788-798.
15. Nieuwenhuis S., Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus - norepinephrine system. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131:510-532.
16. Nieuwenhuis S., Holroyd C.B., Mol N., Coles M.G.H. Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Res. 2004, 28:441-448.
17. Pfabigan D.M., Alexopoulos J., Bauer H., Sailer U. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in eventrelated brain potentials. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:656-664.
18. Polezzi D., Lotto L., Daum I., Sartori G., Rumiati R. Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 187:116-122.
19. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
20. Sarinopoulos I., Grupe D., Mackiewicz K., Herrington J., Lor M., Steege E., Nitschke J. Uncertainty during anticipation modulates neural responses to aversion in human insula and amygdala. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:929-940.
21. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:695-703.
22. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 1992, 5:297-323.
23. Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1947, Princeton University Press, Princeton. second ed.
24. Yeung N., Sanfey A.G. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:6258-6264.
25. Zhou Z., Yu R., Zhou X. To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3606-3613.