Conditional embryo relinquishment: Choosing to relinquish embryos for family-building through a Christian embryo 'adoption' programme

Human Reproduction

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3327-3338

  Frith, Lucy ^a   Blyth, Eric ^b   Paul, Marilyn S ^c   Berger, Roni ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cryopreserved embryos; decision making; embryo disposition; embryo relinquishment; patient attitudes

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; ARTICLE; CHRISTIAN; CONCEPTION; EMBRYO ADOPTION PROGRAM; EMBRYO DISPOSITION; EMBRYO RELINQUISHMENT; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PARENTHOOD; RESPONSIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81055132905     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der313     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). Guidelines for Embryo Donation for Reproductive Purposes. Auckland: ACART, 2008.
2. ASRM Ethics Committee Report. Interests, obligations, and rights of the donor in gamete donation. Fertil Steril 2009a;91:22-27.
3. ASRM Ethics Committee Report. American Society for Reproductive Medicine: defining embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2009b;92:1818-1819.
4. ASRM Ethics committee report. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertil Steril 2004;81;527-531.
5. ASRM Practice committee report. Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2006;86:S38-S50.
6. Association of Internet Researchers. Ethical decision-making and Internet research. 2002. http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (20 February 2008, date last accessed).
7. Bangsbøll S, Pinborg A, Yding Anderson C, Nyboe Andersen A. Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2415-2419.
8. Blyth E, Frith L. Donor-conceived people's access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity. Int J Law Policy Fam 2009; 23:192-210.
9. Blyth E, Paul M, Berger R, Frith L. Embryo relinquishment for family building: how should it be conceptualised? Int J Law Policy Fam 2011; 25:260-285.
10. Bryman A. Social Science Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
11. Burton PJ, Sanders K. Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia. Med J Aus 2004;180:559-561.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: National Summary 2007. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2007/index.htm (25 August 2010, date last accessed).
13. Collard C, Kashmeri S. De embriones congelados a siempre familias: ́ Etica del parentesco y ética de la vida en la circulación de embriones entre las parejas donantes y las adoptantes en el programa SnowflakesTM (From frozen embryos to forever families: kinship ethics and life ethics in the circulation of embryos amongst placing and adopting couples in the SnowflakesTM program). Revista de Antropologia Social 2009;18:43-65.
14. de Lacey S. Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1661-1669.
15. de Lacey S. Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients' thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1751-1758.
16. Elford K, Lawrence C, Leader A. Research implications of embryo cryopreservation choices made by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1154-1155.
17. Federal Register. (2002) Embryo adoption; public awareness campaigns. Fed Regist 67: 48654-48660. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi? dbname=2002-register&docid=02-18826-filed.pdf.
18. Frith L. Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod 2001;16:818-824.
19. Fuscaldo G, Savulescu J. Spare embryos: 3000 reasons to rethink the significance of genetic relatedness. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 10:164-168.
20. Fuscaldo G, Russell S, Gillam L. How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients' views. Hum Reprod 2007;22:3129-3138.
21. Georgia State Senate. (2009), The Open Adoption Act. http://www.legis. ga.gov/Legislation/en-US/display.aspx?Legislation=26858 (28 June 2011, date last accessed).
22. Goedeke S, Payne D. Embryo donation in New Zealand: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1939-1945.
23. Gurmankinn A, Sisti D, Caplan A. Embryo disposal practices in IVF clinics in the United States. Polit Life Sci 2004;22:2-6.
24. Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril 2006;86:86-91.
25. Hammond K, Steinkampf M, Cataldo N. Embryo donation in the USA: a 2008 practice survey of reproductive health professionals. Fertil Steril 2009;92(Supp):S133.
26. Hurwitz J, Lederman M, Jindal S, Lieman H, Santoro N. Embryo donation (ED): an increasingly popular option in the United States. Fertil Steril 2005;84(Supp 1):PS235-PS236.
27. Jones H Jr, Cohen J, Cooke I, Kempers R, Brinsden P, Saunders D. IFFS surveillance 2010. Fertil Steril 2010.
28. Kingsberg S, Applegarth L, Janata J. Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals. Fertil Steril 2000;73:215-220.
29. Klipstein S, Reindollar RH, Regan MM, Alper MM. Gender bias in the disposition of frozen embryos. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1181-1184.
30. Klock S, Sheinin S, Kazer R. The disposition of unused frozen embryos. NEJM 2001;345:69-70.
31. Kovacs GT, Breheny SA, Dear MJ. Embryo donation at an Australian university in-vitro fertilisation clinic: issues and outcomes. Med J Aus 2003;178:127-129.
32. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthy. In: Milinski AK (ed). Cases in Qualitative Research. California: Pyrczsk, 1999, 173-181.
33. Lanzendorf S, Ratts V, Keller S, Odem R. Disposition of cryopreserved embryos by infertility patients desiring to discontinue storage. Fertil Steril 2010;93:486-489.
34. Laruelle C, Englert Y. Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. Fertil Steril 1995;63:1047-1050.
35. Lyerly AD, Brelsford E, Bankowski B, Faden R, Wallach E. A qualitative study of individuals' attitudes regarding their cryopreserved embryos. Int Congr Ser 2004;1271:353-356.
36. Lyerly AD, Steinhauser K, Namey E, Tulsky JA, Cook-Deegan R, Sugarman J, Walmer D, Faden R, Wallach E. Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1623-1630.
37. Lyerly AD, Steinhauser K, Voils C, Namey E, Alexander C, Bankowski B, Cook-Deegan R, Dodson W, Gates E, Jungheim E et al. Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertil Steril 2010;93:499-509.
38. MacCallum F. Embryo donation parents' attitudes towards donors: Comparison with adoption. Hum Reprod 2009;25:517-523.
39. MacCallum F, Golombok S, Brinsden P. Parenting and child development in families with a child conceived through embryo donation. J Fam Psychol 2007;21:278-287.
40. McCracken G. The Long Interview. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1988.
41. McCoyd J. Pregnancy interrupted: Nonnormative loss of a desired pregnancy after termination for fetal anomaly. Bryn Mawr, PA: Bryn Mawr College, 2003.
42. McCoyd J, Kerson TS. Conducting intensive interviews using e-mail. Qualita Soc Work 2006;5:389-406.
43. McMahon C, Gibson F, Cohen J, Leslie G, Tennant C, Saunders D. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks & embryo dilemmas. Reprod Technol 2000;10:131-135.
44. McMahon CA, Saunders D. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:140-147.
45. McMahon CA, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, Saunders DM, Porter KA, Tennant CC. Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. Hum Reprod 2003;18:871-877.
46. Melamed R Jr, Bonetti T, Braga D, Madaschi C, Jaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: parents' choices. Hum Fertil 2009;12:185-190.
47. Mental Health Professional Group. Discussion list managed by ASRM. Discussion March 2011.
48. Mohler-Kuo M, Zellweger U, Duran A, Hohl MK, Gutzwiller F, Mutsch M. Attitudes of couples towards the destination of surplus embryos: results among couples with cryopreserved embryos in Switzerland. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1930-1938.
49. Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, Butler A, MacDougall K. Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicate the disposition decision. Fertil Steril 2005;84:431-434.
50. Nachtigall R, MacDougall K, Lee M, Harrington J, Becker G. What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2069-2072.
51. Newton CR, McDermid A, Tekpetey F, Tummon IS. Embryo donation: attitudes toward donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate. Hum Reprod 2003;18:878-884.
52. Newton CR, Fisher J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Hughes L, Isacsson D. Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 2007;22:3124-3128.
53. Office of Population Affairs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010) Embryo Adoption Funding.http://www.hhs.gov/opa/embryoadoption/ funding/index.html.
54. Oke K, Hammarberg K, Blood J. Frozen embryos-what decisions to make? 17th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Fertility Society of Australia, Hobart (abstract), 1998, p. 30.
55. Paul MS, Berger R, Blyth E, Frith L. Relinquishing frozen embryos for conception by infertile couples. Fam Syst Health 2010;28:258-273.
56. Provoost V, Pennnings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van de Velde A, De Lissnyder E, Dhont M. Infertility patients' beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preference. Hum Reprod 2009;24:896-905.
57. Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van de Velde A, Dhont M. Patients' conceptualization of cryopreserved embryos used in their fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2010;25:705-713.
58. Roberts E. Extra embryos: the ethics of cryopreservation in Ecuador and elsewhere. Am Ethnol 2007;34:181-199.
59. Söderström-Anttila V, Foudila T, Ripatti U-R, Siegberg R. Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1120-1128.
60. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
61. Svanberg A, Boivin J, Bergh T. Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos. Acta Obstetrica Gynaecologica Scandinavia 2001;80:849-855.
62. Tinney L, Hammarberg K, Breheny S, Leeton J. Deciding the fate of excess frozen embryos. In: 21st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Fertility Society of Australia, Gold Coast (abstract), 2002, p. 41.
63. Trounson A, Leeton J, Besanko M, Wood C, Conti A. Pregnancy established in an infertile patient after transfer of a donated embryo fertilised in vitro. Br Med J 1983;286:835-838.
64. Van Voorhis BJ, Grinstead DM, Sparks AET, Gerard JL, Weie RF. Establishment of a successful donor embryo program: medical, ethical, and policy issues. Fertil Steril 1999;71:604-608.
65. Zweifel JE, Christianson M, Jaeger AS, Olive DL, Lindheim SR. Needs assessment for those donating to stem cell research. Fertil Steril 2007; 88:560-564