A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of Wavelight® Allegretto wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™; STAR S4 IR™; in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): Analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1339-1347

  Moshirfar, Majid ^a   Betts, Brent S ^b   Churgin, Daniel S ^c   Hsu, Maylon ^a   Neuffer, Marcus ^a   Sikder, Shameema ^d   Church, Dane ^e   Mifflin, Mark D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Allegretto; Laser in situ keratomileusis; LASIK; VISX; Wavefront guided; Wavefront optimized

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRECTED DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY; DRY EYE; EMMETROPIA; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE MICROSTRIAE; FEMALE; HIGHER ORDER ABERRATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; MALE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SAFETY; SCHIRMER TEST; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCORRECTED DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; WAVEFRONT GUIDED LASIK PLATFORM; WAVEFRONT OPTIMIZED LASIK PLATFORM;

EID: 81055129633     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s24316     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1396-1403.
2. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC, El Danasoury MA. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127:1-7.
3. Zadok D, Maskaleris G, Garcia V, Shah S, Montes M, Chayet A. Outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2391-2394.
4. Gimbel HV, van Westenbrugge JA, Penno EE, Ferensowicz M, Feinerman GA, Chen R. Simultaneous bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: safety and efficacy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1461-1468.
5. Farah SG, Azar DT, Gurdal C, Wong J. Laser in situ keratomileusis: literature review of a developing technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:989-1006.
6. Condon PI, Mulhern M, Fulcher T, Foley-Nolan A, O'Keefe M. Laser intrastromal keratomileusis for high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:199-206.
7. Knorz MC, Liermann A, Seiberth V, Steiner H, Wiesinger B. Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia of -6.00 to -29.00 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:575-584.
8. Gimbel HV, Basti S, Kaye GB, Ferensowicz M. Experience during the learning curve of laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:542-550.
9. Guell JL, Muller A. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia from -7 to -18 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:222-228.
10. Kulkamthorn T, Silao JN, Torres LF, et al. Wavefront guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the treatment of high myopia by using the CustomVue wavefront platform. Cornea. 2008;27:787-790.
11. Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Krueger RR. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:447-453.
12. Buhren J, Martin T, Kuhne A, Kohnen T. Correlation of aberrometry, contrast sensitivity, and subjective symptoms with quality of vision after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:559-568.
13. Yamane N, Miyata K, Samejima T, et al. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3986-3990.
14. Liang J, Williams DR, Miller DT. Supernormal vision and highresolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997;14:2884-2892.
15. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Wavefront guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16:116-121.
16. Kohnen T, Buhren J, Kuhne C, Mirshahi A. Wavefront guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2175-2185.
17. Zhou C, Chai X, Yuan L, He Y, Jin M, Ren Q. Corneal higher-order aberrations after customized aspheric ablation and conventional ablation for myopic correction. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32:431-438.
18. Randleman JB, Perez-Straziota CE, Hu MH, White AJ, Loft ES, Stulting RD. Higher-order aberrations after wavefront optimized photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:260-264.
19. Padmanabhan P, Mrochen M, Basuthkar S, Viswanathan D, Joseph R. Wavefront guided versus wavefront optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34: 389-397.
20. Perez-Straziota CE, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Visual acuity and higher-order aberrations with wavefront guided and wavefront optimized laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:437-441.
21. Miraftab M, Seyedian MA, Hashemi H. Wavefront guided vs wavefront optimized LASIK: a randomized clinical trial comparing contralateral eyes. J Refract Surg. 2010;27:245-250.
22. Brint SF. Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with alcon and wavelight lasers: a prospective randomized trial. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S799-S803.
23. Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront optimized versus wavefront guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S424-S430.
24. Tran DB, Shah V. Higher order aberrations comparison in fellow eyes following IntraLase LASIK with WaveLight Allegretto and CustomCornea LADARVision4000 systems. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:S961-S964.
25. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:769-777.
26. Moshirfar M, Espandar L, Meyer JJ, Tanner JR, Holz HA. Prospective randomized trial of wavefront guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the CustomCornea and CustomVue laser systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1727-1733.
27. Yu J, Chen H, Wang F. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront guided and wavefront optimized LASIK with the WaveLight platform. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:477-486.
28. Moshirfar M, Hatch BB, Chang JC, Kurz CJ, Eugarrios MF, Mifflin MD. Prospective, contralateral comparison of 120-mum and 90-mum LASIK flaps using the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2010;27:251-259.
29. Levinson BA, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Ayres BD, Laibson PR. Referrals to the Wills Eye Institute Cornea Service after laser in situ keratomileusis: reasons for patient dissatisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:32-39.
30. Biebesheimer JB, Kang TS, Huang CY, Yu F, Hamilton DR. Development of an advanced nomogram for myopic astigmatic wavefront guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42:241-247.