Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes

Brain Research

Volumn 1398, Issue , 2011, Pages 40-54

  Sun, Hsin Mei ^a   Simon Dack, Stephanie L ^b   Gordon, Robert D ^a   Teder, Wolfgang A ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context effect; Event related potentials (ERPs); Natural scene; Object categorization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MENTAL TASK; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PHASE RANDOMIZED SCENE BACKGROUND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RAPID OBJECT CATEGORIZATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 80955177130     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: 00068993     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.029     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bacon-Macé, N.g., Macé, M.J.M., Fabre-Thorpe, M.l., Thorpe, S.J., 2005. The time course of visual processing: backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Res. 45, 1459-1469.
2. Bar, M., 2004. Visual objects in context. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 617-629.
3. Bar, M., Kassam, K.S., Ghuman, A.S., Boshyan, J., Schmidt, A.M., Dale, A.M., et al., 2006. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 449-454.
4. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R.J., Rabinowitz, J.C., 1982. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 143-177.
5. Biederman, I., Kosslyn, S.M., Osherson, D.N., 1995. Visual object recognition, 2nd ed. Visual cognition: an invitation to cognitive science, Vol. 2. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA US, pp. 121-165.
6. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., Kobayashi, S., 2001. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 2224-2232.
7. Boyce, S.J., Pollatsek, A., 1992. Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18, 531-543.
8. Boyce, S.J., Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., 1989. Effect of background information on object identification. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 556-566.
9. Busch, N.A., Debener, S., Kranczioch, C., Engel, A.K., Herrmann, C.S., 2004. Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1810-1820.
10. Campbell, T.A., Winkler, I., Kujala, T., 2007. N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1. Psychophysiology 44, 530-540. (Pubitemid 46905326)
11. Codispoti, M., Ferrari, V., Junghöfer, M., Schupp, H.T., 2006. The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs. Neuroimage 32, 583-591. (Pubitemid 44149161)
12. Davenport, J.L., 2007. Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Mem. Cognit. 35, 393-401.
13. Davenport, J.L., Potter, M.C., 2004. Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol. Sci. 15, 559-564.
14. de Boor, C., 1978. A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer-Verlag, New York.
15. de Gelder, B., Meeren, H.K.M., Righart, R., Van den Stock, J., van de Riet, W.A.C., Tamietto, M., 2006. Beyond the face: exploring rapid influences of context on face processing. Prog. Brain Res. 155, 37-48.
16. Delorme, A., Makeig, S., 2004. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9-21.
17. Delorme, A., Rousselet, G.A., Macé, M.J.M., Fabre-Thorpe, M.l., 2004. Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. Cognit. Brain Res. 19, 103-113.
18. Duncan-Johnson, C.C., Donchin, E., 1982. The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biol. Psychol. 14, 1-52.
19. Eimer, M., 1993. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol. Psychol. 35, 123-138.
20. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Hohnsbein, J., 1999. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol. 101, 267-291.
21. Ferrari, V., Codispoti, M., Cardinale, R., Bradley, M.M., 2008. Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1753-1761.
22. Friedman, D., Simson, R., Ritter, W., Rapin, I., 1975. The late positive component (P300) and information processing in sentences. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38, 255-262.
23. Ganis, G., Kutas, M., 2003. An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Cognit. Brain Res. 16, 123-144.
24. Goffaux, V.R., Jacques, C., Mouraux, A., Oliva, A., Schyns, P.G., Rossion, B., 2005. Diagnostic colours contribute to the early stages of scene categorization: behavioural and neurophysiological evidence. Vis. Cogn. 12, 878-892.
25. Gordon, R.D., 2004. Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 760-777.
26. Gordon, R.D., 2006. Selective attention during scene perception: evidence from negative priming. Mem. Cognit. 34, 1484-1494.
27. Haegens, S., Osipova, D., Oostenveld, R., Jensen, O., 2010. Somatosensory working memory performance in humans depends on both engagement and disengagement of regions in a distributed network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 26-35.
28. Intraub, H., 1981. Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7, 604-610.
29. Joubert, O.R., Rousselet, G.A., Fize, D., Fabre-Thorpe, M.l., 2007. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference. Vision Res. 47, 3286-3297. (Pubitemid 350110589)
30. Joubert, O.R., Fize, D., Rousselet, G.A., Fabre-Thorpe, M.l., 2008. Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. J. Vis. 8, 1-18.
31. Keysers, C., Perrett, D.I., 2002. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 120-125.
32. Kok, A., 1997. Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biol. Psychol. 45, 19-56.
33. Kok, A., 2001. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38, 557-577. (Pubitemid 32422300)
34. Kutas, M., Hillyard, S.A., 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207, 203-205. (Pubitemid 10141432)
35. Macé, M.J.M., Joubert, O.R., Nespoulous, J.-L., Fabre-Thorpe, M., 2009. The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird. PLoS One 4, e5927.
36. Maris, E., 2004. Randomization tests for ERP-topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. Psychophysiology 41, 42-151.
37. Maris, E., Oostenveld, R., 2007. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. Methods 164, 177-190. (Pubitemid 46950991)
38. Mudrik, L., Lamy, D., Deouell, L.Y., 2010. ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia 48, 507-517.
39. Oliva, A., Torralba, A., 2006. Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Prog. Brain Res. 155, 23-36.
40. Palmer, S.E., 1975. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Mem. Cognit. 3, 519-526.
41. Potter, M.C., 1975. Meaning in visual search. Science 187, 965-966.
42. Potter, M.C., 1976. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. J. Experimental Psychology Human Learning Memory 2, 509-522.
43. Righart, R., de Gelder, B., 2006. Context influences early perceptual analysis of faces: an electrophysiological study. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1249-1257. (Pubitemid 44289097)
44. Rousselet, G.A., Fabre-Thorpe, M.l., Thorpe, S.J., 2002. Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 629-630.
45. Schmitt, B.M., Münte, T.F., Kutas, M., 2000. Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology 37, 473-484. (Pubitemid 30625477)
46. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., Marlot, C., 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520-522. (Pubitemid 26170929)
47. Torralba, A., 2003. Contextual priming for object detection. International J. Computer Vision 53, 169-191.
48. Torralba, A., Sinha, P., 2001. Statistical context priming for object detection. Proc. Intern. Conference Comput. Vision 1, 763-770.
49. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M.S., Henderson, J.M., 2006. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychol. Rev. 113, 766-786.
50. VanRullen, R., Thorpe, S.J., 2001. The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 454-461.