Identifiability analysis and parameter estimation of a single Hodgkin-Huxley type voltage dependent ion channel under voltage step measurement conditions

Neurocomputing

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 178-188

  Csercsik, Dávid ^a   Hangos, Katalin M ^a,c   Szederkényi, Gábor ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b PÁZMÁNY PÉTER CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Computer algebra; Dynamical modeling; Optimization; Single cell neuronal models; System identification

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ALGEBRA; DYNAMICAL MODELING; IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; IN-SILICO; ION CHANNEL; MEASURED DATA; MEASUREMENT CONDITIONS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MULTIPLE VOLTAGE; SINGLE CELL NEURONAL MODELS; SINGLE-STEP; STEADY STATE PARAMETER; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIONS; THREE PARAMETERS; UNDER VOLTAGE; VOLTAGE CLAMP;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); OPTIMIZATION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

VOLTAGE DEPENDENT ANION CHANNEL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; HODGKIN HUXLEY EQUATION; MATHEMATICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PARAMETER; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; STEADY STATE; VOLTAGE CLAMP;

EID: 80955158351     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hodgkin A., Huxley A. A quantitative description of membrane current and application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 1952, 117:500-544.
2. Izhikevich E. Neural excitability, spiking and bursting. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 2000, 10:1171-1266.
3. Izhikevich E. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans. Neural Network 2003, 14:1569-1572.
4. Izhikevich E. Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience 2005, The MIT Press, New Jersey.
5. Ljung L. System Identification-Theory for the User 1987, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. Walter E. Identification of State Space Models 1982, Springer, Berlin.
7. Walter E. Identifiability of Parametric models 1987, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
8. Rodriguez-Fernandez M., Balsa-Canto E., Egea J., Banga J. Identifiability and robust parameter estimation in food process modeling: application to a drying model. J. Food Eng. 2007, 83:374-383.
9. Davidescu F., Jorgensen S. Structural parameter identifiability analysis for dynamic reaction networks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63:4754-4762.
10. S. Diop, M. Fliess, On nonlinear observability, in: First European Control Conference, ECC'91, Grenoble, 1991, p. 152.
11. Fliess M., Glad S.T. An algebraic approach to linear and nonlinear control. Essays on Control: Perspectives in the Theory and its Applications 1993, 223-267. Birkhauser, Boston. H.L. Treutelman, J.C. Willeuis (Eds.).
12. Ljung L., Glad T. On global identifiability of arbitrary model parametrizations. Automatica 1994, 30:265-276.
13. Margaria G., Riccomagno E., Chappell M.J., Wynn H.P. Differential algebra methods for the study of the structural identifiability of rational function state-space models in the biosciences. Math. Biosci. 2001, 174:1-26.
14. Saccomani M.P., Audoly S., D'Angio L. Parameter identifiability of nonlinear systems: the role of initial conditions. Automatica 2003, 39:619-632.
15. Liao J., Boscolo R., Yang Y., Tran L., Sabatti C., Roychowdhury V. Network component analysis: reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems. PNAS 2003, 100(26):15522.
16. Banga J.R., Balsa-Canto E. Parameter estimation and optimal experimental design. Essays Biochem. 2008, 45:195-209.
17. Yue H., Brown M., Knowles J., Wang H., Broomhead D., Kell D. Insights into the behaviour of systems biology models from dynamic sensitivity and identifiability analysis: a case study of an NF-κB signalling pathway. Mol. Biosyst. 2006, 2(12):640-649.
18. Zak D., Gonye G., Schwaber J., Doyle F. Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic regulatory networks: insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network. Genome Res. 2003, 13(11):2396.
19. Bhalla U., Bower J. Exploring parameter space in detailed single neuron models: simulations of the mitral and granule cells of the olfactory bulb. J. Neurophysiol. 1993, 69:1948-1965.
20. Vanier M., Bower J. Comparative survey of automated parameter-search methods for compartmental neural models. J. Comput. Neurosci. 1999, 7:149-171.
21. Wood R., Gurney K., Wilson C. A novel parameter optimisation technique for compartmental models applied to a model of a striatal medium spiny neuron. Neurocomputing 2004, 58-60:1109-1116.
22. Huys Q., Ahrens M., Paninski L. Efficient estimation of detailed single-neuron models. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:872-890. 10.1152/jn.00079.2006.
23. Gerken W., Purvis L., Butera R. Genetic algorithm for optimization and specification of a neuron model. Neurocomputing 2006, 69:1039-1042.
24. Hayes R., Byrne J., Cox S., Baxter D. Estimation of single-neuron model parameters from spike train data. Neurocomputing 2005, 65-66:517-529. 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.039.
25. Haufler D., Morin F., Lacaille J., Skinner F. Parameter estimation in single-compartment neuron models using a synchronization-based method. Neurocomputing 2007, 70:1605-1610. 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.10.041.
26. Willms A., Baro D., Harris-Warrick R., Guckenheimer J. An improved parameter estimation method for Hodgkin-Huxley models. J. Comput. Neurosci. 1999, 6:145-168.
27. + channels. Biophys. J. 2003, 84:3508-3528.
28. Lee J., Smaill B., Smith N. Hodgkin-Huxley type ion channel characterization: an improved method of voltage clamp experiment parameter estimation. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 242:123-134.
29. L. Buhry, S. Saïghi, A. Giremus, E. Grivel, S. Renaud, Parameter estimation of the Hodgkin-Huxley model using metaheuristics: application to neuromimetic analog integrated circuits, in: IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2008, pp. 173-176.
30. L. Buhry, A. Giremus, E. Grivel, S. Saïghi, S. Renaud, New variants of the differential evolution algorithm: application for neuroscientists, in: 17th European Signal Processing Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 2009, pp. 2352-2356.
31. Buhry L., Grassia F., Giremus A., Grivel E., Renaud S., Saïghi S. Automated parameter estimation of the Hodgkin-Huxley model using the differential evolution algorithm: application to neuromimetic analog integrated circuits. Neural Comp. 2011, 23:1-27.
32. P. Achard, E. De Schutter, Complex parameter landscape for a complex neuron model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2(7) (2006) e94. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020094.
33. Komendantov A., Trayanova N., Tasker J. Somato-dendritic mechanisms underlying the electrophysiological properties of hypothalamic magnocellular neuroendocrine cells: a multicompartmental model study. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2007, 23:143-168. 10.1007/s1-827-007-0024-z.
34. Bellu G., Saccomani M., Audoly S., D'Angio L. DAISY: a new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2007, 88:52-61.
35. Hernández-Bermejo B., Fairen V. Lotka-Volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. Math. Biosci. 1997, 140:1-32.
36. Walter E., Pronzato L. On the identifiability and distinguishability of nonlinear parametric models. Math. Comput. Simul. 1996, 42:124-134.
37. Stein W., Joyner D. SAGE: system for algebra and geometry experimentation. ACM SIGSAM Bull. 2005, 39:61-64.
38. Beezer R.A. Sage (version 3.4), featured review. SIAM Rev. 2009, 51:785-807.
39. Nelder J., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 1965, 7:308-313.
40. Hough P.D., Kolda T.G., Torczon V.J. Asynchronous parallel pattern search for nonlinear optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2001, 23:134-156.