The Value, Limitations, and Challenges of Employing Local Experts in Conservation Research

Conservation Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1195-1202

  Elbroch, Mark ^a   Mwampamba, Tuyeni H ^b   Santos, Maria J ^a   Zylberberg, Maxine ^a   Liebenberg, Louis ^c   Minye, James ^c   Mosser, Christopher ^a   Reddy, Erin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Laboratorio Universitario de Geofísica Ambiental   (Mexico)

^c Cyber Tracker Conservation   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Ciencia ciudadana; Citizen science; Community participation; DeHoop Nature Preserve; Fiabilidad de observadores; Observer reliability; Participaci n comunitaria; Reserva Natural DeHoop

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; EXPERT SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NATURE RESERVE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RESEARCH WORK; SAMPLING;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

DE HOOP NATURE RESERVE; SOUTH AFRICA; WESTERN CAPE;

ANIMALIA; HARNESS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 80955130699     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01740.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anadón, J. D., A. Giménez, R. Ballestar, and I. Pérez 2009. Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conservation Biology 23:617-6125.
2. Anderson, D. 2001. The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:1294-1297.
3. Bas, Y., V. Devictor, J. P., Moussus, and F. Jiguet 2008. Accounting for weather and time-of-day parameters when analysing count data from monitoring programs. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:3403-3416.
4. Bazilchuk, N. 2004. Cybertracker fuses ancient knowledge with cutting-edge technology. Conservation in Practice 4:37-38.
5. Begg, C. M., K. S. Begg, J. T. Du Toit, and M. G. L. Mills 2003. Scent-marking behaviour of the honey badger, Mellivora capensis(Mustelidae), in the southern Kalahari. Animal Behaviour 66:917-929.
6. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10:1251-1262.
7. Bibby, C. J., N. D. Burgess, D. A. Hill, and S. H. Mustoe 2000. Bird census techniques. 2nd edition. Academic Press, London .
8. Breslow, N. E. 1996. Generalized linear models: checking assumptions and strengthening conclusions. Statistica Applicata 8:23-41.
9. Brook, R. K., and S. M. McLachlan 2005. On using expert-based science to "test" local ecological knowledge. Ecology and Society 10: .
10. Cape Nature. 2009. General info: De Hoop Nature Reserve. Cape Nature, Gatesville, South Africa Available from (accessed January 2009).
11. Cooper, C. B., J. Dickinson, T. Phillips, and R. Bonney 2007. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society 12: .
12. Danielsen, F., et al. 2009. Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 23:31-42.
13. Danielsen, F., M. M. Mendoza, A. Tagtag, P. A. Alviola, D. S. Balete, A. E. Jensen, M. Enghoff, and M. K. Poulsen 2007. Increasing conservation management action by involving local people in natural resource monitoring. AMBIO 36:566-570.
14. Davis, A., and J. R. Wagner 2003. Who knows? On the importance of identifying "Experts" when researching local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology 31:463-489.
15. Delaney, D. G., C. D. Sperling, C. S. Adams, and B. Leung 2008. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions 10:117-128.
16. Doswald, N., F. Zimmermann, and U. Breitenmoser 2007. Testing expert groups for a habitat suitability model for the lynxLynx lynxin the Swiss Alps. Wildlife Biology 13:430-446.
17. Dowler, D. 1996. The use of traditional knowledge by the Fisheries Joint Management Committee in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. Pages 62-63 in A. Fehr and W. Hurst, editors. A seminar on two ways of knowing: indigenous and scientific knowledge. Aurora Science Institute, Inuvik, Northwest Territories, Canada .
18. Drew, J. A. 2005. Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology 19:1286-1293.
19. Evans, J. W., C. A. Evans, J. M. Packard, G. Calkins, and M. Elbroch 2009. Determining observer reliability in counts of river otter tracks. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:426-432.
20. Eysenck, M. W., and M. T. Keane 2005. Cognitive psychology: a student's handbook. 5th edition. Psychology Press. Taylor & Francis, New York .
21. Galloway, A., W. E., M. T. Tudor, and W. M. Vander Haegen 2006. The reliability of citizen science: a case study of Oregon White Oak Stand surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:1425-1429.
22. Goffredo, S., C. Piccinetti, and F. Zaccanti 2004. Volunteers in marine conservation monitoring: a study on the distribution of sea horses carried out in collaboration with recreational scuba divers. Conservation Biology 18:1492-1503.
23. Holck, M. H. 2008. Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost-effective methods. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:2023-2036.
24. Kadmon, R., O. Farber, and A. Danin 2004. Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecological Applications 14:401-413.
25. Lee, T., M.S. Quinn, and D. Duke 2006. Citizen, science, highways, and wildlife: using a web-based GIS to engage citizens in collecting wildlife information. Ecology and Society 11: .
26. Liebenberg, L. 1990. The art of tracking, the origin of science. David Philip, Cape Town .
27. Luo, X., S. Xu, X. Kang, and H. Yang 2009. A review of the sampling theory of comprehensive forest resources monitoring. Frontiers of Forestry in China 4:123-131.
28. MacKenzie, D. I. 2005. What are the issues with presence-absence data for wildlife managers Journal of Wildlife Management 69:849-860.
29. Marvin, D. C., B. A. Bradley, and D. S. Wilcove 2009. A novel, web-based, ecosystem mapping tool using expert opinion. Natural Areas Journal 29:281-292.
30. Moran, P. A. P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic problems. Biometrika 37:17-23.
31. Myers, P., R. Espinosa, C. S. Parr, T. Jones, G. S. Hammond, and T. A. Dewey 2006. The animal diversity web. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available from (accessed May 2010).
32. National Audubon Society. 2009. The 109th Christmas Bird Count. Field Notes 63:1-9.
33. Nerbonne, J. F., and K. C. Nelson 2008. Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: tensions among group goals, data quality, and outcomes. Environmental Management 42:470-479.
34. Sauer, J. R., B. G. Peterjohn, and W. A. Link 1994. Observer differences in the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Auk 111:50-62.
35. Schnoor, J. L. 2007. Citizen science. Environmental Science and Technology 41:5923.
36. Skinner, J. D. 2005. The mammals of the southern African subregion. 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom .
37. Stander, P. E., Ghau, D. Tsisaba, X. Oma, and I. I. Ui 1997. Tracking and the interpretation of spoor: a scientifically sound method in ecology. Journal of Zoology (London) 242:329-341.
38. Yang, X., A. K. Skidmore, D. R. Melick, Z. Zhou, and J. Xu 2006. Mapping non-wood forest product (matsutake mushrooms) using logistic regression and a GIS expert system. Ecological Modelling 198:208-218.
39. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey .
40. Zuercher, G. L., P. S. Gipson, and G. C. Stewart 2003. Identification of carnivore feces by local peoples and molecular analyses. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:961-970.