Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment

Animal

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1972-1983

  Mosnier, E ^a,b   Van Der Werf, H M G ^b,c   Boissy, J ^b,c   Dourmad, J Y ^a,b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^c UMR SAS   (France)

Author keywords

amino acids; broiler; environmental impacts; feed; pig

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BRASSICA NAPUS; GLYCINE MAX; PISUM SATIVUM; SUIDAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 80955122634     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111001078     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AGRESTE (La statistique, l'évaluation et la prospective agricole) 2006. Enquête pratiques culturales. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://agreste.maapar.lbn. fr/ReportFolders/ReportFolders.aspx
2. Althaus HJ, Chudacoff M, Hischier R, Jungbluth N, Osses M and Primas A 2007. Life cycle inventories of chemicals. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0, vol. 8. Swiss Centre for the Life Cycle Inventories, Dü bendorf, Switzerland.
3. Basset-Mens C and van der Werf HMG 2005. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105, 127-144. (Pubitemid 39568816)
4. Basset-Mens C, van der Werf HMG, Robin P, Morvan T, Hassouna M, Paillat JM and Vertès F 2007. Methods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 1395-1405. (Pubitemid 46553860)
5. Binder M 2003. Life cycle analysis of DL-methionine in broiler meat production. Amino News, Evonik Degussa. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://www.aminoacidsandmore.com
6. Blonk H, Lafleur M and van Zeijts M 1997. Towards an environmental infrastructure for the Dutch food industry. Exploring the environmental information conversion of five food commodities. Screening LCA on pork. Appendix 4 of the report. IVAM Environmental Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
7. Carlsson-Kanyama A 1998. Climate change and dietary choices - how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? Food Policy 23, 277-293. (Pubitemid 29081794)
8. Cederberg C and Sonesson U 2006. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of future pig production with different feeding strategies and crop rotations. In Grain legumes and the environment: how to assess benefits and impacts (ed. AEP), Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, Zurich, Switzerland.
9. Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Halberg N, Christensen P, Thrane M and Pengue WA 2008. LCA of soybean meal. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13, 240-254. (Pubitemid 351845083)
10. de Vries and de Boer 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128, 1-11.
11. Dourmad JY, Sève B, Latimier P, Boisen S, Fernandez J, van de Peet-Schwering C and Jongbloed AW 1999. Nitrogen consumption, utilisation and losses in pig production in France, the Netherlands and Denmark. Livestock Production Science 58, 261-264. (Pubitemid 29207800)
12. Eriksson IS, Elmquist H, Stern S and Nybrant T 2005. Environmental systems analysis of pig production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10, 143-154.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 2002. Technical conversion factors (TCF) for agricultural commodities. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/documents/methodology/tcf.pdf
14. Flysjö A, Cederberg C and Strïd I 2008. LCA-databas för konventionella fodermedel, version 1.1, SIK-rapport.
15. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Hischier R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Köllner T, Loerincik Y, Margni M and Nemecek T 2007. Implementation of life cycle impacts assessment methods. Ecoinvent report no. 3, v2.0. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
16. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M and van Dorland R 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (ed. S Solomon, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, M Tignorand HL Miller), pp. 129-234. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
17. Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R and Huijbregts MAJ 2002. Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
18. Information Science, Technology and Applications (ISTA) 2009. Oil world annual 2009, vol. 1 ISTA Mielke GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
19. Institut du Porc (IFIP) 2009. Note de conjoncture aliment. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://www.itp. asso.fr
20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (ed. HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara and K Tanabe), IGES, Japan.
21. Jungbluth N, Chudacoff M, Dauriat A, Dinkel F, Doka G, Faist Emmenegger M, Gnansounou E, Kljun N, Schleiss K, Spielmann M, Stettler C and Sutter J 2007. Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Ecoinvent report no. 17. Swiss Centre for the Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
22. Katajajuuri JM, Grönroos J and Usva K 2008. Environmental impacts and related options for improving the chicken meat supply chain. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector, November 12-14, Zurich, Switzerland.
23. Lammers PJ, Kenealy MD, Kliebenstein JB, Harmon JD, Helmers MJ and Honeyman MS 2010. Non-solar energy use and 100-year global warming potential of Iowa swine feedstuffs and feeding strategies. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1204-1212.
24. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Food database 2007. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://www.lcafood.dk/
25. Mattsson B, Cederberg C and Blix L 2000. Agricultural land use in life cycle assessment (LCA): case studies of three vegetable oil crops. Journal of Cleaner Production 8, 283-292.
26. Nemecek T and Kagi T 2007. Life cycle inventories of Swiss and European agricultural production systems. Final report Ecoinvent report v2.0, no. 15, Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon Research Station ART. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Dübendorf, Switzerland.
27. Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE and Mogensen L 2010. Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU. Energy Policy 38, 2561-2571.
28. ® P5000 CT phytase as an alternative to inorganic phosphate supplementation to pig feed used in intensive pig production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12, 514-520. (Pubitemid 350144869)
29. Payraudeau S, van der Werf H and Vertes F 2007. Analysis of the uncertainty associated with the estimation of nitrogen losses from farming systems. Agricultural Systems 94, 416-430. (Pubitemid 46509708)
30. Prudencio da Silva V, van der Werf HMG, Spies A and Soares SR 2010. Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 1831-1839.
31. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M and de Haan C 2006. Livestock's long shadow. Environmental issues and options. Livestock, environment and development initiative. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
32. van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Aarnink AJA, Rom HB and Dourmad JY 1999. Ammonia emissions from pig houses in the Netherlands, Denmark and France. Livestock Production Science 58, 265-269. (Pubitemid 29207801)
33. van der Werf H, Petit J and Sanders J 2005. The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne. Agricultural Systems 83, 153-177. (Pubitemid 40033335)