Sphagnum growth and ecophysiology during mire succession

Oecologia

Volumn 167, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1115-1125

  Laine, Anna M ^a,b   Juurola, Eija ^b   Hájek, Tomáš ^c   Tuittila, Eeva Stiina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Bog; Bog moss; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Fen; Meadow; Photosynthesis; Successional gradient

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL;

BIOMASS; BOG; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL; CHRONOSEQUENCE; DISTURBANCE; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GROWTH; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; MEADOW; MIRE; MOSS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PIONEER SPECIES; RUDERAL; SUCCESSION; TOLERANCE; VASCULAR PLANT; WATER LEVEL;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; FINLAND; FLUORESCENCE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SEASON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPHAGNOPSIDA; TIME; WETLAND;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL; FINLAND; FLUORESCENCE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SEASONS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPHAGNOPSIDA; TIME FACTORS; WETLANDS;

BRYOPHYTA; MAYACACEAE; SPHAGNUM; SPHAGNUM FIMBRIATUM; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 80855138771     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2039-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrus RE (1986) Some aspects of Sphagnum ecology. Can J Bot 64: 416-426.
2. Andrus RE, Wagner DJ, Titus JE (1983) Vertical zonation of Sphagnum mosses along hummock-hollow gradients. Can J Bot 61: 3128-3139.
3. Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10: 351-371.
4. Bazzaz FA (1996) Plants in changing environment. Linking physiological, population, and community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Springer, Heidelberg, 12A: 57-107.
6. Charman DJ (2002) Peatlands and environmental change. Wiley, Chichester, p 301.
7. Clymo RS, Hayward PM (1982) The ecology of Sphagnum. In: Smith AJE (ed) Bryophyte ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 229-290.
8. Gaberščik A, Martinčič A (1987) Seasonal dynamics of net photosynthesis and productivity of Sphagnum papillosum. Lindbergia 13: 105-110.
9. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1: 182-195.
10. Granath G, Strengbom J, Breeuwer A, Heijmans M, Berendse F, Rydin H (2009a) Photosynthetic performance in Sphagnum transplanted along a latitudinal nitrogen deposition gradient. Oecologia 159: 705-715.
11. Granath G, Wiedermann M, Strengbom J (2009b) Physiological responses to nitrogen and sulphur addition and raised temperature in Sphagnum balticum. Oecologia 161: 481-490.
12. Granath G, Strengbom J, Rydin H (2010) Rapid ecosystem shifts in peatlands: linking plant physiology and succession. Ecology 91: 3047-3056.
13. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevence to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111: 1169-1194.
14. Gunnarsson U (2005) Global patterns of Sphagnum productivity. J Bryol 27: 269-279.
15. Gunnarsson U, Granberg G, Nilsson M (2004) Growth, production and interspecific competition in Sphagnum: effects of temperature, nitrogen and sulphur treatments on a boreal mire. New Phytol 163: 349-359.
16. Hájek T, Tuittila E-S, Ilomets M, Laiho R (2009) Light responses of mire mosses-a key to survival after water-level drawdown. Oikos 118: 240-250.
17. Hulme PD, Blyth AW (1982) The annual growth period of some Sphagnum species on the Silver Flowe National Reserve, south-west Scotland. J Bryol 12: 287-291.
18. Johnson LC, Damman AWH (1993) Decay and its regulation in Sphagnum peatlands. Adv Bryol 5: 249-296.
19. Laine J, Harju P, Timonen T, Laine A, Tuittila E-S, Minkkinen K, Vasander H (2009) The inticate beauty of Sphagnum mosses-a Finnish guide to identification (Univ Helsinki Dept Forest Ecol Publ 39). Department of Forest Ecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, pp 1-190.
20. 2 exchange during primary succession of boreal mires as controlled by phenology of plants. Ecoscience 15: 460-471.
21. Leppälä M, Oksanen J, Tuittila E-S (2011a) Methane flux dynamics during the mire succession. Oecologia 165: 489-499.
22. 2 dynamics between successional mire plant communities during wet and dry summers. J Veg Sci 22: 357-366.
23. Lichtenthaler HK, Ač A, Marek MV, Kalina J, Urban O (2007) Differences in pigment composition, photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll fluorescence images of sun and shade leaves of four tree species. Plant Physiol Biochem 45: 577-588.
24. Lindholm T (1990) Growth dynamics of the peat moss Sphagnum fuscum on hummocks on a raised bog in southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 27: 67-78.
25. Lindholm T, Vasander H (1990) Production of eight species of Sphagnum at Suurisuo mire, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 27: 145-157.
26. Maseyk KS, Green TGA, Klinac D (1999) Photosynthetic response of New Zealand Sphagnum species. N Z J Bot 37: 155-165.
27. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Cholorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot 50: 659-668.
28. Merilä P, Galand PE, Fritze H, Tuittila E-S, Kukko-oja K, Laine J, Yrjälä K (2006) Methanogen communities along a primary succession transect of mire ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 55: 221-229.
29. Murray KJ, Tenhunen JD, Nowak RS (1993) Photoinhibition as a control on photosynthesis and production of Sphagnum mosses. Oecologia 96: 200-207.
30. Rehell S, Heikkilä R (2009) Young successional stages of aapa mires on the land uplift coast of northern Ostrobothnia, Finland. SUO 60: 1-22.
31. Rydin H, Jeglum JK (2006) Biology of peatlands. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 354.
32. Rydin H, McDonald AJS (1985a) Photosynthesis in Sphagnum at different water contents. J Bryol 13: 579-584.
33. Rydin H, McDonald AJS (1985b) Tolerance of Sphagnum to water level. J Bryol 13: 571-578.
34. Schipperges B, Rydin H (1998) Response of photosynthesis of Sphagnum species from contrasting microhabitats to tissue water content and repeated dessiccation. New Phytol 140: 677-684.
35. Sundberg S, Hansson J, Rydin H (2006) Colonization of Sphagnum on land uplift islands in the Baltic Sea: time, area, distance and life history. J Biogeogr 33: 1479-1491.
36. Tuittila E-S, Väliranta M, Laine J, Korhola A (2007) Quantifying patterns and controls of mire vegetation succession in a southern boreal bog in Finland using partial ordinations. J Veg Sci 18: 891-902.
37. Valladares F, Pearcy RW (1997) Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutifolia. Plant Cell Environ 20: 25-36.
38. van Breemen N (1995) How Sphagnum bogs down other plants. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 270-275.
39. Vitt DH, Wieder RK (2009) Bryophyte-dominated peatlands. In: Goffinet B, Shaw J (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 357-392.
40. Wilcox D, Andrus RE (1987) The role of Sphagnum fimbriatum in secondary succession in a road salt impacted bog. Can J Bot 65: 2270-2275.
41. Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1983) Responses of an early and a late successional species of Polygonum to variations in resource availability. Oecologia 56: 397-404.