메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 167, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 903-911

Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Yes, if we choose to use it

Author keywords

Alpha diversity; Beta diversity; Diversity partitioning; Gamma diversity; Species turnover

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ENTROPY; INSECT; LITERATURE REVIEW; NOMENCLATURE; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 80855123561     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2128-4     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (69)

References (28)
  • 2
    • 77954581990 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Multiplicative partition of true diversity yields independent alpha and beta components; additive partition does not
    • Baselga A (2010) Multiplicative partition of true diversity yields independent alpha and beta components; additive partition does not. Ecology 91: 1974-1981.
    • (2010) Ecology , vol.91 , pp. 1974-1981
    • Baselga, A.1
  • 3
    • 80855128088 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity
    • doi: 10. 1007/s00442-011-2124-8
    • Gorelick R (2011) Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity. Oecologia. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-011-2124-8.
    • (2011) Oecologia
    • Gorelick, R.1
  • 4
    • 0000006498 scopus 로고
    • Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences
    • Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427-432.
    • (1973) Ecology , vol.54 , pp. 427-432
    • Hill, M.O.1
  • 5
    • 39549094019 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is there a "true" diversity?
    • Hoffmann S, Hoffmann A (2008) Is there a "true" diversity? Ecol Econ 65: 213-215.
    • (2008) Ecol Econ , vol.65 , pp. 213-215
    • Hoffmann, S.1    Hoffmann, A.2
  • 6
    • 0000752502 scopus 로고
    • The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters
    • Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577-586.
    • (1971) Ecology , vol.52 , pp. 577-586
    • Hurlbert, S.H.1
  • 7
    • 33646876613 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Entropy and diversity
    • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113: 363-375.
    • (2006) Oikos , vol.113 , pp. 363-375
    • Jost, L.1
  • 8
    • 38449096471 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components
    • Jost L (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88: 2427-2439.
    • (2007) Ecology , vol.88 , pp. 2427-2439
    • Jost, L.1
  • 9
    • 65549120026 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mismeasuring biological diversity: response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008)
    • Jost L (2009) Mismeasuring biological diversity: response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008). Ecol Econ 68: 925-928.
    • (2009) Ecol Econ , vol.68 , pp. 925-928
    • Jost, L.1
  • 10
    • 77954580286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Independence of alpha and beta diversities
    • Jost L (2010) Independence of alpha and beta diversities. Ecology 91: 1969-1974.
    • (2010) Ecology , vol.91 , pp. 1969-1974
    • Jost, L.1
  • 11
    • 80855130616 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way
    • doi: 10. 1007/s00442-011-2126-6
    • Jurasinski G, Koch M (2011) Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way. Oecologia. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-011-2126-6.
    • (2011) Oecologia
    • Jurasinski, G.1    Koch, M.2
  • 12
    • 58549098885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity
    • Jurasinski G, Retzer V, Beierkuhnlein C (2009) Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity. Oecologia 159: 15-26.
    • (2009) Oecologia , vol.159 , pp. 15-26
    • Jurasinski, G.1    Retzer, V.2    Beierkuhnlein, C.3
  • 13
    • 0030303753 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities
    • Lande R (1996) Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5-13.
    • (1996) Oikos , vol.76 , pp. 5-13
    • Lande, R.1
  • 14
    • 26944455121 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data
    • Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75: 435-450.
    • (2005) Ecol Monogr , vol.75 , pp. 435-450
    • Legendre, P.1    Borcard, D.2    Peres-Neto, P.R.3
  • 15
    • 77952323540 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity?
    • Moreno CE, Rodríguez P (2010) A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Oecologia 163: 282-297.
    • (2010) Oecologia , vol.163 , pp. 282-297
    • Moreno, C.E.1    Rodríguez, P.2
  • 16
    • 80855132630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Back to basics and toward a unifying framework
    • doi: 10. 1007/s00442-011-2125-7
    • Moreno CE, Rodríguez P (2011) Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Back to basics and toward a unifying framework. Oecologia. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-011-2125-7.
    • (2011) Oecologia
    • Moreno, C.E.1    Rodríguez, P.2
  • 17
    • 77954617717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On beta diversity decomposition: trouble shared is not trouble halved
    • Ricotta C (2010) On beta diversity decomposition: trouble shared is not trouble halved. Ecology 91: 1981-1983.
    • (2010) Ecology , vol.91 , pp. 1981-1983
    • Ricotta, C.1
  • 18
    • 0018383566 scopus 로고
    • Diversity indices: which ones are admissible?
    • Routledge RD (1979) Diversity indices: which ones are admissible? J Theor Biol 76: 503-515.
    • (1979) J Theor Biol , vol.76 , pp. 503-515
    • Routledge, R.D.1
  • 19
    • 77953953850 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity
    • Tuomisto H (2010a) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33: 2-22.
    • (2010) Ecography , vol.33 , pp. 2-22
    • Tuomisto, H.1
  • 20
    • 77953923721 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena
    • Tuomisto H (2010b) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography 33: 23-45.
    • (2010) Ecography , vol.33 , pp. 23-45
    • Tuomisto, H.1
  • 21
    • 78449253763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist
    • Tuomisto H (2010c) A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist. Oecologia 164: 853-860.
    • (2010) Oecologia , vol.164 , pp. 853-860
    • Tuomisto, H.1
  • 22
    • 33845432229 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis
    • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2006) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 87: 2697-2708.
    • (2006) Ecology , vol.87 , pp. 2697-2708
    • Tuomisto, H.1    Ruokolainen, K.2
  • 23
    • 63849262739 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Reply
    • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2008) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Reply. Ecology 89: 3244-3256.
    • (2008) Ecology , vol.89 , pp. 3244-3256
    • Tuomisto, H.1    Ruokolainen, K.2
  • 24
    • 77954599548 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Toward a unified view of diversity partitioning
    • Veech JA, Crist TO (2010) Toward a unified view of diversity partitioning. Ecology 91: 1988-1992.
    • (2010) Ecology , vol.91 , pp. 1988-1992
    • Veech, J.A.1    Crist, T.O.2
  • 25
    • 0034753958 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do commonly used indices of β-diversity measure species turnover?
    • Vellend M (2001) Do commonly used indices of β-diversity measure species turnover? J Veg Sci 12: 545-552.
    • (2001) J Veg Sci , vol.12 , pp. 545-552
    • Vellend, M.1
  • 26
    • 0001226978 scopus 로고
    • Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California
    • Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30: 279-338.
    • (1960) Ecol Monogr , vol.30 , pp. 279-338
    • Whittaker, R.H.1
  • 27
    • 0000594195 scopus 로고
    • Evolution and measurement of species diversity
    • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213-251.
    • (1972) Taxon , vol.21 , pp. 213-251
    • Whittaker, R.H.1
  • 28
    • 0021562554 scopus 로고
    • Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data
    • Wilson MV, Shmida A (1984) Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data. J Ecol 72: 1055-1064.
    • (1984) J Ecol , vol.72 , pp. 1055-1064
    • Wilson, M.V.1    Shmida, A.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.