Independence of alpha and beta diversities

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1969-1974

  Jost, Lou ^a  

^a Baños ^*  (Ecuador)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIVERSITY INDEX; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; NICHE PARTITIONING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SAMPLING; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 77954580286     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-0368.1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baselga, A. 2010. Multiplicative partition of true diversity yields independent alpha and beta components; additive partition does not. Ecology 91:1974-1981.
2. Chao, A., L. Jost, S. C. Chiang, Y. H. Jiang, and R. Chazdon. 2008. A two-stage probabilistic approach to multiplecommunity similarity indices. Biometrics 64:1178-1186.
3. Chao, A., and T.-J. Shen. 2009. SPADE (species prediction and diversity estimation), ( http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/softwareCE.html)
4. Couteron, P., and R. Pelissier. 2004. Additive apportioning of species diversity: towards more sophisticated models and analyses. Oikos 107:215-221.
5. Gering, J., T. Crist, and J. Veech. 2003. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 17:488-499.
6. Hill, M. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427-432.
7. Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363-375.
8. Jost, L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427-2439.
9. ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17:4015-4026.
10. Jost, L. 2009. Mismeasuring biological diversity: response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008). Ecological Economics 68: 925-928.
11. Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5-13.
12. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National. Academy of Sciences USA 70:3321-3323.
13. Ribiero, D., P. Prado, K. Brown, and A. Freitas. 2008. Additive partitioning of butterfly diversity in a fragmented landscape: importance of scale and implications for conservation. Diversity and Distributions 14:961-968.
14. Stendera, S., and R. Johnson. 2005. Additive partitioning of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 50:1360-1375.
15. Summervilie, K., M. Boulware, J. Veech, and O. Crist. 2003. Spatial variation in species diversity and composition of forest Lepidoptera in eastern deciduous forests of North. America. Conservation Biology 17:1045-1057.
16. Summervilie, K., T. Wilson, J. Veech, and T. Crist. 2006. Do body size and diet breadth affect partitioning of species diversity? A test with forest Lepidoptera. Diversity and Distributions 12:91-99.
17. Veech, J., and T. O. Crist. 2010. Diversity partitioning without statistical independence of alpha and beta. Ecology 91:1964- 1969.
18. Veech, J., K. Summervilie, T. O. Crist, and J. Gering. 2002. The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99:3-9.