Improving feedback to students online: Teaching tips from experienced faculty

Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 503-509

  Bonnel, Wanda ^a   Boehm, Heidi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; STANDARD; TEACHING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; FACULTY, NURSING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 80755176939     PISSN: 00220124     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20110715-02     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bonnel, W. (2008). Improving feedback to students in online courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(5), 290-294.
2. Bonnel, W., Ludwig, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Providing feedback in online courses: What do students want? How do we do that? Annual Review of Nursing Education, 6, 205-221.
3. Bonnel, W., & Smith, K. (2010). Teaching technologies in nursing and the health professions. New York, NY: Springer.
4. Bonnel, W., Starling, C. K., Wambach, K., & Tarnow, K. (2003). Blended roles: Preparing the advanced practice nurse educator/clinician with a web-based nurse educator certificate program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(6), 347-353.
5. Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin. Retrieved from www.aahea.org/bulletins/articles/sevenprinciples.htm
7. Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Gerkin, K., Taylor, T., & Weatherby, F. (2009). The perception of learning and satisfaction of nurses in the online environment. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 25(1), 8-13.
9. Hummel, H. G. (2006). Feedback model to support designers of blended learning courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved from www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
10. Markert, L., & Backer, P. (2009). Contemporary technology innovations, issues, and perspectives. Tinley Park, IL: Goodheart-Willcox.
11. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. National League for Nursing. (2005). Core competencies of nurse educators with task statements. Retrieved from www.nln.org/profdev/pdf/corecompetencies.pdf
14. Phillips, J. (2005). Strategies for active learning in online continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 77-83.
15. Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31-38.
16. Schmieder, E. (2008). Communication: The tool to interact with and control your online classroom environment. Retrieved from www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_08/article03.htm
17. Suski, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. San Francisco, CA: Anker.
18. Vella, J. (2001). Taking learning to task: Creative strategies for teaching adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Walvoord, B., Anderson, V., & Angelo, T. A. (2010). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.