The efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Urological Research

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 401-410

  Yuan, Haichao ^a   Zheng, Shuo ^a   Liu, Liangren ^a   Han, Ping ^a   Wang, Jia ^a   Wei, Qiang ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Nephrostomy tube; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Standard; Tubeless; Ureteral stent

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; DICLOFENAC; MORPHINE; PETHIDINE; TRAMADOL;

ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEVER; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SAFETY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ANALGESICS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; FEVER; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SAFETY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80755172131     PISSN: 03005623     EISSN: 14340879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0355-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. I Fernstrom B Johannson 1976 Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: A new extraction technique Scand J Urol Nephrol 10 257 259 1006190 1:STN:280:DyaE2s%2FotVOktA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 8001412)
2. HN Winfield P Weyman RV Clayman 1986 Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal J Urol 136 77 79 3712621 1:STN:280:DyaL283islyhtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16059598)
3. SV Jackman SG Docimo JA Cadeddu, et al. 1998 The "miniperc" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy World J Urol 16 371 374 9870281 10.1007/s003450050083 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FoslWjtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 128742960)
4. GC Bellman R Davdoff J Candela J Gerspach S Kurtz L Stout 1997 Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery J Urol 157 1578 1582 9112480 10.1016/S0022-5347(01) 64799-2 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ms1OmtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27171728)
5. HN Shah HS Sodha AA Khandkar, et al. 2008 A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless J Endourol 22 1433 1439 18690809 10.1089/end.2007.0350
6. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 17:1-12 (Pubitemid 26120810)
7. Higgins JPT, Green S (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.0.2 updated September 2009. The Cochrane Collaboration
8. MR Desai RA Kukreja MM Desai SS Mhaskar KA Wani SH Patel SD Bapat 2004 A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless J Urol 172 565 567 15247731 10.1097/01.ju.0000130752.97414.c8 (Pubitemid 38900205)
9. MI Feng K Tamaddon A Mikhail JS Kaptein GC Bellman 2001 Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy Urology 58 345 350 11549477 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01225-0 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MrgtVyisg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32816347)
10. R Marcovich AI Jacobson J Singh D Shah A El-Hakim BR Lee AD Smith 2004 No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 18 743 747 15659895 10.1089/end.2004.18.743 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FktFKntA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39441764)
11. A Tefekli F Altunrende K Tepeler A Tas S Aydin AY Muslumanoglu 2006 Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison Int Urol Nephrol 39 57 63 17171416 10.1007/s11255-006- 9040-6
12. MS Agrawal M Agrawal A Gupta, et al. 2008 A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 22 439 442 18257738 10.1089/end.2007.0118 (Pubitemid 351430710)
13. M Choi J Brusky J Weaver, et al. 2006 Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small bore tube J Endourol 20 766 770 17094752 10.1089/end.2006.20.766 (Pubitemid 44736254)
14. M Sofikerim D Demirci E Huri, et al. 2007 Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Safe even in supracostal access J Endourol 21 967 972 17941770 10.1089/end.2006.0216 (Pubitemid 47608920)
15. I Singh A Singh G Mittal 2008 Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? J Endourol 22 427 434 18355137 10.1089/end.2007.0269 (Pubitemid 351430728)
16. C Kara B Resorlu M Bayindir A Unsal 2010 A randomized comparison of totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients Urology 76 289 294 20299077 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.077
17. S Mishra RB Sabnis A Kurien, et al. 2010 Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL BJU Int 106 1045 1048 20151965 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x
18. MO Istanbulluoglu B Ozturk M Gonen T Cicek H Ozkardes 2009 Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study Int Urol Nephrol 41 541 545 19165617 10.1007/s11255-008-9517-6
19. D Weiland RN Pedro JK Anderson SL Best C Lee K Hendlin J Kim M Monga 2007 Randomized prospective evaluation of nephrostomy tube configuration: impact on postoperative pain Int Braz J Urol 33 313 322 17626647 10.1590/S1677- 55382007000300003
20. Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Roshani A, Niroumand H, Nikpour S (2008) Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Acta Medica Iranica 46:383-385
21. YC Jou MC Cheng JH Sheen CT Lin PC Chen 2004 Cauterization of access tract for nephrostomy tube-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 18 547 549 15333219 10.1089/end.2004.18.547 (Pubitemid 39142117)
22. Al-Ba'adani TH, Al-Kohlany KM, Al-Adimi A, Al-Towaity M, Al-Baadani T, Alwan M, Al-Hussieni M, Al-Germozi S, Al-Masani M, Al-Badwy K, El-Nono IH (2008) Tubeless percutaneous neprolithotomy: the new gold standard, Int Urol Nephrol 40:603-608
23. DI Lee C Uribe L Eichel S Khonsari J Basillote HK Park CC Li EM McDougall RV Clayman 2004 Sealing percutaneous nephrolithotomy tracts with gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant: initial clinical use J Urol 171 575 578 14713762 10.1097/01.ju.0000103501.98597.b7 (Pubitemid 38090432)
24. R DavidoV GC Bellman 1997 Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage J Urol 157 1229 1231 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64931-0 (Pubitemid 27130787)
25. HK Salem HA Morsi A Omran MA Daw 2007 Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children J Pediatr Urol 3 235 238 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06. 011 (Pubitemid 46679487)
26. RM Yang GC Bellman 2004 Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients Urology 63 1036 1041 15183942 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.051 (Pubitemid 38746796)
27. B Lojanapiwat 2010 Does previous open nephrolithotomy affect the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol Int 85 42 46 20606406 10.1159/000318188 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cjltlylug%3D%3D
28. D Beiko L Lee 2010 Outpatient tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the initial case series Can Urol Assoc J 4 E86 E90 20694090