Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Safe even in supracostal access

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 967-971

  Sofikerim, Mustafa ^a   Demirci, Deniz ^a   Huri, Emre ^a   Erşekerci, Erol ^a   Karacagil, Mustafa ^a  

^a ERCIYES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICLOFENAC;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARCINOGENESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGEON; TUBE; URINE INCONTINENCE; URINOMA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; DICLOFENAC; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROLOGY; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; SAFETY; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35348942374     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0216     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Lingeman JE. Improving outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Access. EAU Update Ser 2005;3:37-43.
2. Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD, et al. Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol 2003;17:411-414.
3. Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, et al. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 1997;157:1578-1582.
4. Candela J, Davidoff R, Gerspach J, et al. Tubeless percutaneous surgery: A new advance in the technique of percutaneous renal surgery. Techn Urol 1997;3:6-11.
5. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 2004;172:565-567.
6. Marcovich R, Jacobson AI, Singh J, et al. No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2004;18:743-747.
7. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, et al. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2001;58:345-350.
8. Wickham JE, Miller RA, Kellett MJ, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: One stage or two? Br J Urol 1984;56:582-585.
9. Winfield HN, Weyman P, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal. J Urol 1986;136:77-79.
10. Yang RM, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients. Urology 2004;63:1036-1040.
11. Limb J, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: Review of first 112 patients. Urology 2002;59:527-531.
12. Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 2005;96:879-883.
13. Shah HN, Kausik V, Hedge S, et al. Initial experience with hemostatic fibrin glue as adjuvant during tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2006;20:194-198.
14. Lee DI, Uribe C, Eichel L, et al. Sealing percutaneous nephrolithotomy tracts with gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant: Initial clinical use. J Urol 2004;171:575-578.
15. Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Are there any predictive factors? Urology 2005;66:38-40.
16. Kessaris DN, Bellman GC, Pardalidis NP, Smith AG. Management of hemorrhage after percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 1995;153:604-608.
17. Martin X, Murat FJ, Feitosa LC, et al. Severe bleeding after nephrolithotomy: Results of hyperselective embolization. Eur Urol 2000;37:136-139.