Evaluation of reliability and stability of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) genotypes in Dryland areas of Iran

Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 432-437

  Karimizadeh, Rahmatollah ^a   Mohammadi, Mohtasham ^a   Shefazadeh, Mohammad Kazem ^b  

^a Dryland Agriculture Research Institute   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

AMMI; GE interaction; Lentil; Stability; Yield

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GRAIN YIELD; GROWING SEASON; IRAN; LENTIL; NONHUMAN; SEED KERNEL;

LENS CULINARIS;

EID: 80755143212     PISSN: 14590255     EISSN: 14590263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Sarker, A., Erskine, W. and Singh, M. 2003. Regression models for lentil seed and straw yields in Near East. Agric. and Forest Meteo. 116:61-72.
2. Sabaghnia, N., Dehghani, H. and Sabaghpour, S. H. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype x environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci. 46:1100-1106.
3. FAO 2001. Data Stat Year 2001. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
4. Rajput, M. A. and Sarwar, P. 1989. Genetic variability, correlation studies and their implications in selection of high yielding genotypes in lentil. Lens Newsletter 16:5-8.
5. Rao, S. K. and Yadav, S. P. 1989. Genetic analysis of biological yield, harvest index and seed yield in lentil. Lens Newsletter 15:3-5.
6. Ramgiry, S. R., Paliwal, K. K. and Tomar, S. K. 1989. Variability and correlations of grain yield and other quantitative characters in lentil. Lens Newsletter 16:17-18.
7. Arshad, M., Bakhsh, A., Zubair, M. and Ghafoor, A. 2003. Genetic variability and correlation studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pak. J. Botany 35(4):605-611.
8. Wricke, G. 1962. Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 47: 92-96.
9. Finlay, K. W. and Wilkinson, G. N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
10. Eberhart, S. A. and Russell, W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
11. Roemer, T. 1917. Sind die ertragsreichen Sorten ertragssicherer. Mitt. DLG 32:87-89.
12. Lin, C. S. and Binns, M. R. 1988. A method of analyzing cultivar× location× year experiments: A new stability parameter. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:425-430.
13. Annicchiarico, P. 1997. Joint regression vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica 94:53-62.
14. Gauch, H. G. and Zobel, R. W. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In Kang, M. S. and Gauch, H. G Jr. (eds), Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC, Boca Raton, New York, USA, pp. 85-122.
15. Altin, G. N., Baker, R. J., McRae, K. B. and Lu, X. 2000. Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 40:7-13.
16. Crossa, J. 1990. Statistical analyses of multi-location trials. Advs in Agron. 44:55-85.
17. Crossa, J., Gauch, H. G. and Zobel, R. W. 1990. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 30:493-500.
18. Gauch, H. G. 1992. Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, Netherlands, Amsterdam.
19. Hohls, T. 1995. Analysis of genotype-environment interactions. S. Afr. J. Sci. 91:121-124.
20. Zobel, R. W. and Gauch, H. G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:388-393.
21. Gauch, H. G. 2006. Winning the accuracy game. American Scientist 94:133-141.
22. Cornelius, P. L. 1993. Statistical test and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 33:1186-1193.
23. Cornelius, P. L. 1980. Functions approximating Mandel's tables for the means and standard deviations of the first three roots of a Wishart matrix. Technometrics 224:613-616.
24. Mandel, J. 1971. A new analysis of variance model for non-additive data. Technometrics 13:1-18.
25. Kataoka, S. 1963. A stochastic programming model. Econometrica 31:181-196.
26. Eskridge, K. M. 1990. Selection of stable cultivars using a safety-first rule. Crop Sci. 30:369-374.
27. Gauch, H. G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, London and New York.
28. Purchase, J. L. 1997. Parametric Analysis to Describe Genotype x Environment Interaction and Yield Stability in Winter Wheat. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture of the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
29. Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype × Environment Interactions. Challenge and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations. FAO, Rome.
30. Dehghani, H., Sabaghpour, S. H. and Sabaghnia, N. 2008. Genotype × environment interaction for grain yield of some lentil genotypes and relationship among univariate stability statistics. Span. J. Agric. Res. 6(3):385-394.
31. Najafian, G., Kaffashi, A. K. and Jafar-Nezhad, A. 2010. Analysis of grain yield stability in hexaploid wheat genotypes grown in temperate regions of Iran using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 12:213-222.
32. Erskin, E. W. 1997. Lessons for breeders from land races of lentil. Euphytica 93:107-112.
33. Freeman, G. H. 1972. Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype × environment interactions. Heredity 29:339-351.
34. Ebdon, J. S. and Gauch, H. G. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype-environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42:489-496.
35. Gomez-Becerra, H., Morgounov, A. and Abugalieva, A. 2006. Evaluation of grain yield stability, reliability and cultivar recommendations in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from Kazakhstan and Siberia. J. Central Euro. Agri. 6(4):649-660.
36. Flores, F., Moreno, M. T. and Cubero, J. I. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G × E interaction. Field Crops Res. 56:271-286.
37. Flores, F., Moreno, M. T., Martinez, A. and Cubero, J. I. 1996. Genotype - environment interaction in faba bean: Comparison of AMMI and principal coordinate models. Field Crops Res. 47:117-127.
38. Genstat 2008. Genstat Release 11. VSN International Ltd, Waterhouse, Waterhouse Street, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP1 1ES, UK.
39. Matlab 2009. Matlab software Release 7.8. Math Work, Inc.