A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction

Field Crops Research

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 271-286

  Flores, F ^a   Moreno, M T ^b   Cubero, J I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUELVA   (Spain)

^b Ctro Invest Y Formacion A   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Genotype environment interaction; Principal components analysis; Stability; Yield

Indexed keywords

CROP; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; GENOTYPE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031879310     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abou-El-Fittouh H.A., Rawlings J.O., Miller P.A. Classification of environments to control genotype by environment interactions with an application to cotton. Crop Sci. 9:1969;135-140.
2. Baker R.J. Tests for crossover genotype-environment interactions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:1988;405-410.
3. Becker H.C. Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica. 30:1981;835-840.
4. Becker H.C., Leon J. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding. 101:1988;1-23.
5. Brandle J.E., Arthur L.M. A comparative evaluation of two methods of selecting locations used for testing spring wheat cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:1992;301-304.
6. Breese E.L. The measurement and significance of genotype-environment interactions in grasses. Heredity. 24:1969;27-44.
7. Burr E.J. Cluster sorting with mixed characters types: II. Fusion strategies. Aust. Comput. J. 2:1970;98-103.
8. Comstock, R.F., Moll, R.H., 1963. Genotype-environment interactions. In: Hanson W.D., Robinson, H.F. (Eds.), Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAS-NCR Publ. 982, Washington, DC, pp. 164-196.
9. Crossa J. Statistical analyses of multi-location trials. Adv. Agron. 44:1990;55-85.
10. Crossa J., Fox P.N., Pfeiffer W.H., Rajaram S., Gauch H.G. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:1991;27-37.
11. Cubero, J.I., Flores, F., 1994. Métodos estadísticos para el estudio de la estabilidad varietal en ensayos agrícolas. Junta de Andalucia. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca. Monografías 12/94, pp. 176.
12. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:1966;36-40.
13. Everit, B.S., Dunn, G., 1983. Advanced Methods of Data Exploration and Modelling. Heinemann Educ. Books, London.
14. Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:1963;742-754.
15. Flores, F., 1993. Interacción Genotipo-Ambiente en Vicia faba L. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Córdoba, Spain.
16. Flores F., Moreno M.T., Martinez A., Cubero J.I. Genotype-environment interaction in faba bean: comparison of AMMI and principal coordinate models. Field Crops Res. 47:1996;117-127.
17. Fox P.N., Rosielle A.A. Reducing the influence of environmental main-effects on pattern analysis of plant breeding environments. Euphytica. 31:1982;645-656.
18. Fox P.N., Skovmand B., Thompson B.K., Braun H.J., Cormier R. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica. 47:1990;57-64.
19. Francis T.R., Kannenberg L.W. Yield stability studies in short-season maize: I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:1978;1029-1034.
20. Gauch H.G. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics. 88:1988;705-715.
21. Gauch, H.G., 1990. MATMODEL version 2.0: AMMI and related analyses for two-way data matrices. Microcomputer Power. Ithaca, N.Y.
22. Gauch H.G., Furnas R.E. Statistical analysis of yield trials with MATMODEL. Agron. J. 83:1991;916-920.
23. Ghaderi A., Everson E.H., Cress C.E. Classification of environments and genotypes in wheat. Crop Sci. 20:1980;707-710.
24. Guilan Yue S.K.P., Walter T.L., Wassom C.E., Liang G.H. Stability analysis of yield in maize, wheat and sorghum and its implications in breeding programs. Plant Breeding. 104:1990;72-80.
25. Hill M.O. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Appl. Stat. 23:1974;340-354.
26. Hill J. Genotype-environment interaction, a challenge for plant breeding. J. Agric. Sci. 85:1975;477-493.
27. Hühn V.M. Beiträge zur erfassung der phänotypischen stabilität. EDV Med. Biol. 10:1979;112-117.
28. Huehn M. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability: Part 1. Theory. Euphytica. 47:1990;189-194.
29. Huehn M. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability; Part 2. Applications. Euphytica. 47:1990;195-201.
30. Jalaluddin M., Harrison S.A. Repeatability of stability estimators for grain yield in wheat. Crop Sci. 33:1993;720-725.
31. Kang M.S. A rank-sum method for selectig high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res. Comm. 16:1988;113-115.
32. Kang M.S., Pham H.N. Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron. J. 83:1991;161-165.
33. Kang M.S., Miller J.D., Darrah L.L. A note on relationship between stability variance and ecovalence. J. Hered. 78:1987;107.
34. Kempton R.A. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J. Agr. Sci. 103:1984;123-135.
35. Ketata, H., Yan, S.K., Nachit, M., 1989: Relative consistency performance across environments. Int. Symp. on Physiology and Breeding of Winter Cereals for stressed Mediterranean Environments. Montpellier, July 3-6, 1989.
36. Léon, J., 1986. Methods of simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability. In: Biometrics in Plant Breeding. Proc. 6th Meeting EUCARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Birmingham, UK, pp. 299-308.
37. Lin C.S. Grouping genotypes by a cluster method directly related to genotype-environment interaction mean square. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62:1982;277-280.
38. Lin C.S., Binns M.R. Procedural approach for assessing cultivar-location data: Pairwise genotype-environment interactions of test cultivars with checks. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:1985;1065-1071.
39. Lin C.S., Binns M.R. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar×location data. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:1988;193-198.
40. Lin C.S., Binns M.R. Assessment of a method for cultivar selection based on regional trial data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:1991;379-388.
41. Lin C.S., Binns M.R., Lefkovitch L.P. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26:1986;894-900.
42. Lopez, J., 1990. Estudio de la base genética del contenido en taninos condensados en la semilla de las habas (Vicia faba L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Córdoba, Spain.
43. Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T., Bibby, J.M., 1979. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, London.
44. Nassar R., Hühn M. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: test of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics. 43:1987;45-53.
45. Piepho H.-P., Lotito S. Rank correlation among parametric and nonparametric measure of phenotypic stability. Euphytica. 64:1992;221-225.
46. RAEA, 1988. VARIEDADES DE HABAS. CAMPAÑA 87/88. Red Andaluza de Experimentación Agraria. Dirección General de Investigación y Extensión Agrarias. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.
47. RAEA, 1989. VARIEDADES DE HABAS. CAMPAÑA 88/89. Red Andaluza de Experimentación Agraria. Dirección General de Investigación y Extensión Agrarias. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.
48. RAEA, 1990. VARIEDADES DE HABAS. CAMPAÑA 89/90. Red Andaluza de Experimentación Agraria. Dirección General de Investigación y Extensión Agrarias. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.
49. RAEA, 1994. VARIEDADES DE GUISANTES PROTEAGINOSOS. CAMPAÑA 93/94. Red Andaluza de Experimentación Agraria. Dirección General de Investigación y Extensión Agrarias. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.
50. RAEA, 1995. VARIEDADES DE GUISANTES PROTEAGINOSOS. CAMPAÑA 94/95. Red Andaluza de Experimentación Agraria. Dirección General de Investigación y Extensión Agrarias. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.
51. RAEA, 1996. VARIEDADES DE GUISANTES PROTEAGINOSOS. CAMPAÑA 95/96. Red Andaluza de Experimentación Agraria. Dirección General de Investigación y Extensión Agrarias. Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca, Sevilla.
52. Romagosa, I., Fox, P.N., 1993. Genotype×environment interaction and adaptation. In: Hayward, M.D., Bosemark, N.O., Romagosa, I. (Eds.), Plant Breeding. Principles and prospects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 373-390.
53. Shukla G.K. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity. 29:1972;237-245.
54. Skrøppa T. A critical evaluation of methods available to estimate the genotype×environment interaction. Studia Forestalia Suecuca. 166:1984;3-14.
55. Sneller C.H., Dombek D. Comparing soybean cultivar ranking and selection for yield with AMMI and full-data performance estimates. Crop Sci. 35:1995;1536-1541.
56. Sokal R.R., Michener C.D. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 38:1958;1409-1438.
57. Tai G.C.C. Genotypic stability analysis and application to potato regional trials. Crop Sci. 11:1971;184-190.
58. Westcott B. Some methods of analysing genotype-environment interaction. Heredity. 56:1986;243-253.
59. Westcott B. A method of assessing the yield stability of crop genotypes. J. Agric. Sci. 108:1987;267-274.
60. Wricke G. Über eine methode zur erfassung der ökologischen streubreite in feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 47:1962;92-96.
61. Wricke, G., Weber, W.E., 1980. Erweiterte analyse von wechselwirkungen in versuchsserien. In: Köpcke, W., Überla K. (Eds.), Biometrie-heute und Morgen, 87-95. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
62. Yates F., Cochran W.G. The analysis of groups of experiments. J. Agr. Sci. 28:1938;556-580.
63. Zobel R.W., Wright M.J., Gauch H.G. Jr. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:1988;388-393.