Cup Size and Risk of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1305-1309

  Peter, Robin ^a   Lübbeke, Anne ^a   Stern, Richard ^a   Hoffmeyer, Pierre ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Acetabular cup size: acetabular cup diameter; Hip arthroplasty dislocation; Total hip dislocation; Total hip head size

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; GROUPS BY AGE; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80755135505     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Khatod M., Barber T., Paxton E., et al. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:19.
2. Phillips C.B., Barrett J.A., Losina E., et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A:20.
3. Turner R.S. Postoperative total hip prosthetic femoral head dislocations. Incidence, etiologic factors, and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 301:196.
4. Lubbeke A., Stern R., Garavaglia G., et al. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 57:327.
5. Sadr Azodi O., Adami J., Lindstrom D., et al. High body mass index is associated with increased risk of implant dislocation following primary total hip replacement: 2,106 patients followed for up to 8 years. Acta Orthop 2008, 79:141.
6. Bystrom S., Espehaug B., Furnes O., et al. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003, 74:514.
7. Ekelund A., Rydell N., Nilsson O.S. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 80 years of age and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, 281:101.
8. Jolles B.M., Zangger P., Leyvraz P.F. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:282.
9. Kim Y.H., Choi Y., Kim J.S. Influence of patient-, design-, and surgery-related factors on rate of dislocation after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:1258.
10. Berry D.J., von Knoch M., Schleck C.D., et al. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:2456.
11. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:11.
12. Kelley S.S., Lachiewicz P.F., Hickman J.M., et al. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:163.
13. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., Beaule P.E. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:108.
14. Conroy J.L., Whitehouse S.L., Graves S.E., et al. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:867.
15. Cuckler J.M., Moore K.D., Lombardi A.V., et al. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:41.
16. Geller J.A., Malchau H., Bragdon C., et al. Large diameter femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene: minimum 3-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:53.
17. Malik A., Maheshwari A., Dorr L.D. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1832.
18. Masonis J.L., Bourne R.B. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 405:46.
19. Lee B.P., Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., et al. Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of an acute fracture of the femoral neck: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:70.
20. Lubbeke A., Moons K.G., Garavaglia G., et al. Outcomes of obese and nonobese patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 59:738.
21. Crowninshield R.D., Maloney W.J., Wentz D.H., et al. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:102.
22. Kluess D., Martin H., Mittelmeier W., et al. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29:465.
23. Nadzadi M.E., Pedersen D.R., Callaghan J.J., et al. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17:32.
24. Padgett D.E., Lipman J., Robie B., et al. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:48.
25. Scifert C.F., Brown T.D., Pedersen D.R., et al. A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:152.