Schedulability analysis of CAN with non-abortable transmission requests

IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Khan, Dawood A ^a   Davis, Robert I ^b   Navet, Nicolas ^c  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c Centre Atrium   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE-STUDIES; CONTROLLER AREA NETWORK; EMBEDDED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; REAL-TIME PROPERTIES; SCHEDULABILITY ANALYSIS; TRANSMISSION REQUEST; TRANSMIT BUFFERS; UPPER BOUND; WORST CASE RESPONSE TIME;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS;

FACTORY AUTOMATION;

EID: 80655128565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2011.6058998     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. N. Navet, Y.-Q. Song, F. Simonot Lion, and C. Wilwert, "Trends in Automotive Communication Systems," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, pp. 1204-1223, Jun 2005.
2. P. Marti and, A. Camacho, M. Velasco, and M. El Mongi Ben Gaid, "Runtime Allocation of Optional Control Jobs to a Set of CAN-Based Networked Control Systems," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 6, pp. 503-520, November 2010.
3. M. D. Natale, "Evaluating message transmission times in Controller Area Networks without buffer preemption," in 8th Brazilian Workshop on Real-Time Systems, 2006.
4. AUTOSAR, "Specification of CAN driver." Autosar Release 4.0 Rev1. Available at http://www.autosar.org, 2009.
5. K. Tindell, A. Burns, and A. Wellings, "Calculating Controller Area Network (CAN) message response times," Control Engineering Practice, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1163-1169, 1995.
6. R. Davis, A. Burn, R. Bril, and J. Lukkien, "Controller Area Network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised," Real-Time Systems, vol. 35, pp. 239-272, 2007. (Pubitemid 46223453)
7. M. Grenier and N. Navet, "Fine-tuning MAC-level protocols for optimized real-time QoS," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 4, pp. 6-15, February 2008. (Pubitemid 351459549)
8. H. Zeng, M. Di Natale, P. Giusto, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, "Using Statistical Methods to Compute the Probability Distribution of Message Response Time in Controller Area Network," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 6, pp. 678-691, November 2010.
9. H. Hansson, T. Nolte, C. Norstrom, and S. Punnekkat, "Integrating Reliability and Timing Analysis of CAN-Based Systems," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, pp. 1240-1250, Dec. 2002.
10. A. Meschi, M. D. Natale, and M. Spuri, "Priority inversion at the network adapter when scheduling messages with earliest deadline techniques,"in 8th Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems, pp. 243-248, June 1996.
11. M. D. Natale, "Understanding and using the Controller Area Network."Handout of a lecture at U.C. Berkeley available at http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee249/fa08/, October 2008.
12. D. A. Khan, R. J. Bril, and N. Navet, "Integrating hardware limitations in CAN schedulability analysis," in Wip paper at the 8th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS 2010), pp. 207-210, May 2010.
13. R. Davis, S. Kollmann, V. Pollex, and F. Slomka, "Controller Area Network (CAN) schedulability Analysis with FIFO queues," in 23rd Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS), pp. 45-56, 5-8th July 2011.
14. R. Davis and A. Burns, "Improved priority assignment for global fixed priority pre-emptive scheduling in multiprocessor real-time systems,"Real-Time Systems, vol. 47, pp. 1-40, 2011.
15. K. Tindell and A. Burns, "Guaranteeing message latencies on Controller Area Network (CAN)," in Proceedings of 1st international CAN conference, pp. 1-11, 1994.
16. C. Braun, L. Havet, and N. Navet, "NETCARBENCH: a benchmark for techniques and tools used in the design of automotive communication systems," in 7th IFAC International Conference on Fieldbuses and Networks in Industrial and Embedded Systems, pp. 321-328, 2007. Available at http://www.netcarbench.org.