Topic model validation

Neurocomputing

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 125-133

  Ramirez, Eduardo H ^a   Brena, Ramon ^a   Magatti, Davide ^b   Stella, Fabio ^b  

^a SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fowlkes Mallows index; Monte Carlo; Soft clustering; Topic models

Indexed keywords

FOWLKES-MALLOWS INDEX; MONTE CARLO; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; OVERLAPPING CLUSTERING; PROBABILISTIC INTERPRETATION; RECALL AND PRECISION; REUTERS-21578; SOFT CLUSTERING; STATISTICAL EVIDENCE; TOPIC MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SEMANTICS;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECALL; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 80555155527     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.04.032     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Feldman R., Sanger J. The Text Mining Handbook 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York.
2. The Economist, A special report on managing information: Data, data everywhere, The Economist ISSN 0013-0613, 〈〉. http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15557443.
3. Halevy A., Norvig P., Pereira F. The unreasonable effectiveness of data. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2009, 24(2):8-12. ISSN 1541-1672, 〈http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2009.36〉.
4. Griffiths T.L., Steyvers M. Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of National Academy of Science United States of America 2004, 101(Suppl 1):5228-5235.
5. T.L. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, A probabilistic approach to semantic representation, in: G.W., C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society, 2002, pp. 381-386.
6. Hofmann T. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In the Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 1999, 289-296. UAI.
7. Blei D.M., Andrew N., Jordan M.I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003, 3:993-1022.
8. Griffiths T.L., Steyvers M. Probabilistic Topic Models 2007, Erlbaum.
9. Hofmann T. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning 2001, 42(1-2):177-196. ISSN 0885-6125, 〈http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=599631〉.
10. Chang J., Boyd-Graber J., Gerrish S., Wang C., Blei D. Reading tea leaves: how humans interpret topic models. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 2009.
11. Wallach H.M., Murray I., Salakhutdinov R., Mimno D.M. Evaluation methods for topic models. ICML, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2009, vol. 382:139. ACM, ISBN 978-1-60558-516-1, 〈http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icml/icml2009.html#WallachMSM09〉.
12. Fowlkes E.B., Mallows C.L. A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1983, 78(383):553-569. ISSN 01621459, 〈http://www.jstor.org/stable/2288117〉.
13. Wallace D.L. A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings: comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1983, 78(383):569-576. ISSN 01621459, 〈http://www.jstor.org/stable/2288118〉.
14. Wu J., Xiong H., Chen J. Adapting the right measures for K-means clustering. KDD '09: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2009, 877-886. ACM, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 978-1-60558-495-9, doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557019.1557115.
15. Denoeud L., Guénoche A. Comparison of distance indices between partitions. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization 2006, 21-28.
16. Di Nuovo A., Catania V. On external measures for validation of fuzzy partitions. Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2007, vol. 4529:491-501. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
17. Brunk H.D., Holstein J.E., Williams F. A comparison of binomial approximations to the hypergeometric distribution. American Statistician 1968, 22(1):24-26.