Improving peer review: Increasing reviewer participation

Learned Publishing

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 231-233

  Ling, Fay ^a  

^a American Thoracic Society   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80555138867     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20110311     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ware, M. 2005. Online submission and peer-review systems. Learned Publishing, 18: 245-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315105774648771
2. Souder, L. 2011. The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature. Learned Publishing, 24: 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110109
3. Sataloff, R.T. 2009. Peer review: universal, but valid? Ear Nose Throat Journal, 88: 848-851.
4. Hojat, M., Gonnella, J.S., and Caelleigh, A.S. 2003. Impartial judgment by the 'gatekeepers' of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 8: 75-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022670432373
5. Saper, C.B., Maunsell, J.H., and Sagvolden, T. 2009. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5: 4, www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/4 (accessed 25 February 2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-4
6. Davis, P. 2010. Cascading Peer-Review - the future of open access? Society for Scholarly Publishing, http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/10/12/cascading-peerreview-future-of-open-access/ (accessed 25 February 2011).
7. Grivell, L. 2006. Through a glass darkly: the present and the future of editorial peer review. EMBO Reports, 7: 567-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400718
8. Mandviwalla, M., Patnayakuni, R., and Schuff, D. 2008. Improving the peer review process with information technology. Decision Support Systems, 46: 29-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.005
9. Reviewer Finder, Collexis website, www.collexis.com/products/reviewerfinder.htm (accessed 2 March 2011).
10. Benos, D.J., Bashari, E., Chaves, J.M., Gaggar, A., Kapoor, N., LaFrance, M., et al. 2007. The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education, 31: 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006
11. Riley, B. 2006. Database publication presents unique challenges for the peer reviewer. Nature, www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04993.html (accessed 22 December 2010).