Online submission and peer-review systems

Learned Publishing

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 245-250

  Ware, Mark ^a  

^a Mark Ware Consulting Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644514920     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/095315105774648771     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Moore, J.P. Online submission makes authors do all the work. Nature, 2005(24 Feb):433, 800; doi: 10.1038/433800d.
2. Ware M. Authors say that they prefer online submission. Nature, 2005(31 Mar):434, 559; doi: 10.1038/434559d.
3. ASP = Application Service Provider, i.e. an out-sourced service which includes the hosting of the application software and data
4. The Journal Development seminar in September 2003 and Moving to Online Submission and Peer Review seminar in October 2004
5. Ware, M. Online Submission and Peer Review Systems: A Review of Currently Available Systems and the Experiences of Authors, Referees, Editors and Publishers. ALPSP, 2005. See http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub10.htm
6. My thanks to Richard Wynne of Aries Systems Corporation/Editorial Manager for this perspective
7. Wood, D. Review of online peer review systems. Learned Publishing, 14(2):151-8 URL: www.ingentaselect.com/rpsv/catchword/alpsp/09531513/v14n2/s12/ p151
8. Swan, A. and Brown, S. What Authors Want: The ALPSP Research Study on the Motivations and Concerns of Contributors to Learned Journals. Key Perspectives/ALPSP, 1999). http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub1.htm
9. Donovan, S. Reviewers not attached to online submission. Nature, 2005(21 Apr):434, 956; doi: 10.1038/434956b.
10. Hsieh, Y.-H. Despite some flaws, online submission is the future. Nature, 2005(30 Jun):435, 1160; doi: 10.1038/4351160d.