Compliance and longitudinal strain of cardiovascular stents: Influence of cell geometry

Journal of Medical Devices, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Tan, Tho Wei ^a   Douglas, Graeham R ^b   Bond, Timothy ^c   Phani, A Srikantha ^b  

^a MMC Gamuda   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c Pipestream Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR STENTS; CELL GEOMETRIES; CELL LATTICES; EFFECTIVE POISSON'S RATIO; LONGITUDINAL STRAIN; LONGITUDINAL STRESS; NEGATIVE POISSON'S RATIOS; STRUT THICKNESS; SYSTEMATIC STUDY;

CELLS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOMETRY; POISSON RATIO;

STRAIN;

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR STENT; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; SHEAR STRESS; STENT; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 80555135816     PISSN: 19326181     EISSN: 1932619X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005226     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gibson L.J. Ashby M.F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. 1997, and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Phani A.S. Woodhouse J. Fleck N.A. Wave Propagation in Two Dimensional Periodic Lattices. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 119:1995-2005. 10.1121/1.2179748
3. Rachev A. Manoach E. Bery J. Moore Jr J.E. A Model of Stress-Induced Geometrical Remodeling of Vessel Segments Adjacent to Stents and Artery/graft Anastomoses. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 206(3):429-443. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2143
4. Valentin A. Humphrey J. Evaluation of Fundamental Hypotheses Underlying Constrained Mixture Models of Arterial Growth and Remodeling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 2009, 367(1902):3585-3606. 10.1098/rsta.2009.0113
5. Moore J. Berry J. Fluid and Solid Mechanical Implications of Vascular Stenting. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 30:498-508. 10.1114/1.1458594
6. Rogers C. Edelman E. Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis. Circulation 1995, 91:2995-3001. and "," pp.
7. Berry J.L. Manoach E. Mekkaoui C. Rolland P. Moore Jr J. Rachev A. Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics of a Compliance Matching Stent: In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2002, 13(1):97-105. 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60015-3
8. Bedoya J. Meyer C. Timmins L. Moore J. Effects of Stent Design Parameters on Normal Artery Wall Mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 2006, 128:757-767. 10.1115/1.2246236
9. Lally C. Dolan F. Prendergast P.J. Cardiovascular Stent Design and Vessel Stresses: A Finite Element Analysis. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:1574-1581. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.022
10. Holzapfel G. Stadler M. Gasser T. Changes in the Mechanical Environment of Stenotic Arteries During Interaction With Stents: Computational Assessment of Parametric Stent Designs. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:166-180. 10.1115/1.1835362
11. Migliavacca F.L.,. P. Colombo M. Auricchio F. Pietrabissa R. Mechanical Behavior of Coronary Stents Investigated Through the Finite Element Method. J. Biomech. 2002, 35(6):803-811. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00033-7
12. Petrini L. Migliavacca F. Auricchio F. Dubini G. Numerical Investigation of the Intravascular Coronary Stent Flexibility. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:495-501. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.002
13. Ju F. Xia Z. Sasaki K. On the Finite Element Modeling of Balloon Expandable Stents. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1:86-95. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.07.002
14. Mortier P. De Beule M. Van Loo D. Finite Element Analysis of Side Branch Access During Bifurcation Stenting. Med. Eng. Phys. 2009, 31:434-440. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.013
15. Tan L.B. Webb D.C. Kormi K. Al-Hassani S.T. S. A Method for Investigating the Mechanical Properties of Intracoronary Stents Using Finite Element Numerical Simulation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2001, 78:51-67. 10.1016/S0167-5273(00)00472-1
16. Kastrati A. Mehilli J. Dirschinger J. Pache J. Ulm K. Schühlen H. Seyfarth M. Schmitt C. Blasini R. Neumann F.J. Schömig A. Restenosis After Coronary Placement of Various Stent Types. Am. J. Cardiol. 2001, 87(1):34-39. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01268-6
17. Raamachandran J. Jayavenkateshwaran K. Modeling of Stents Exhibiting Negative Poisson's Ratio Effect. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 10(4):245-255. 10.1080/10255840701198004
18. Edelman E.R. Rogers C. Hoop Dreams: Stents Without Restenosis. Circulation 1996, 94:1199-1202. and "," pp.
19. Leung D. Glagov S. Mathews M.B. Cyclic Stretching Stimulates Synthesis of Matrix Components by Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells in Vitro. Science 1976, 191(4226):475-477. 10.1126/science.128820
20. Yoshitomi Y. Kojima S. Yano M. Sugi T. Matsumoto Y. Saotome M. Tanaka K. Endo M. Kuramochi M. Does Stent Design Affect Probability of Restenosis? A Randomized Trial Comparing Multilink Stents With GFX Stents. Am. Heart J. 2001, 142(3):445-451. 10.1067/mhj.2001.117321
21. Hara H. Nakamura M. Palmaz J. Schwartz R.S. Role of Stent Design and Coatings on Restenosis and Thrombosis. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2006, 58:377-386. 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.022
22. Hoffmann R. Mintz G.S. Haager P.K. Bozoglu T. Grube E. Gross M. Beythien C. Mudra H. vom Dahl J. Hanrath P. Relation of Stent Design and Stent Surface Material to Subsequent In-Stent Intimal Hyperplasia in Coronary Arteries Determined by Intravascular Ultrasound. Am. J. Cardiol. 2002, 89(12):1360-1364. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02347-0