Distinguishing published scholarly content with CrossMark

Learned Publishing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 87-93

  Meyer, Carol Anne ^a  

^a Business Development and Marketing CrossRef   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80555126054     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20110202     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Oransky, I. 2010. So how many retractions are there every year, anyway? Retraction Watch, 16 Nov. Available at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/so-how-many-retractions-are-there-every-yearanyway/(accessed 17 Jan 2011).
2. Corbyn, Z. 2009. Retractions up tenfold, The Times Higher Education, 20 Aug. Available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=4 Accompanying data available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=407826.
3. Wakefield, A. et al. 1998. Retracted: Ileal-lymphoidnodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet, 351: 637-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0
4. Deer, B. 2011. Secrets of the MMR scare: how the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed. British Medical Journal, 342: c5347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5347
5. Godlee, F. et al. 2011. Editorial: Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. British Medical Journal, 342: c7452.
6. Akst, J. 2010. Top retractions of 2010, The Scientist, 16 Dec. Available at http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/57864/ (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
7. Goldacre, B. 2011. Now you see it, now you don't: why journals need to think retractions. The Guardian, 15 Jan. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/15/bad-science-academic-journal-retraction (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
8. Korpela, K. 2010. How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 26: 843-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/03007991003603804
9. Gransalk, K. 2010. Correcting science: increasing number of paper retractions, Lab Times, 6: 27. Available at http://www.lab-times.org/labtimes/issues/lt2010/lt06/lt_2010_06_24_29.pdf (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
10. Hagen, B. 2010. Tools for the effective management of plagiarism complaints. Professional and Scholarly Publishing Bulletin, 9: 8-10. Available at http://www.pspcentral.org/documents/PSPFall2010Bulletin.pdf (accessed 21 Jan 2011).
11. Wager, E. et al. 2009. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/u661/Retractions_COPE_gline_final_3_Sept_09__2_.pdf, (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
12. Colaianni, L. 1992. Retraction, comment, and errata policies of the US National Library of Medicine. The Lancet, 340: 536-537. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)91723-L
13. Kotzin, S. et al. 1989. NLM's practices for handling errata and retractions. Bull Med Libr Assoc., 77: 341. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC227483/pdf/mlab00044-0031.pdf (accessed 26 Jan 2011).
14. Johnson, C. 2010. Author on leave after Harvard inquiry. Boston Globe, 10 Aug. Available at http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/08/10/author_on_leave_after_harvard_inquiry/?s_campaign=8315 (accessed 22 Jan 2011).
15. Hauser, M. et al. 2002. Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 86: B15-B22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00139-7
16. Hauser, M. et al. 2002. Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, author preprint, uncorrected proof. Available at, http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/publications/languagespeech/rulelearn.pdf (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
17. NISO/ALPSP Journal Article Versions (JAV) Technical Working Group, Journal Article Versions (JAV): Recommendations of the NISO/ALPSP JAV Technical Working Group, April 2008, NISO-RP-8-2008, p. 3. Available at http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/RP-8-2008.pdf (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
18. Fenner, M. Bibliographic Management meets Web 2.0. Gobbledygook, 1 Aug 2009. Available at http://blogs.plos.org/mfenner/2009/08/01/bibliographic_management_meets_web_2_0/ (accessed 26 Jan 2011).
19. Dylla, H. CrossMark: Standardizing Funding Information in Scholarly Journal Articles. Presentation at CrossRef Annual Meeting, Nov 2010. Available at http://www.slideshare.net/CrossRef/dylla-cross-refannual-general-mtg-nov2010 (accessed 17 Jan 2011).
20. CrossMark: http://www.crossref.org/crossmark.html(accessed 17 Jan 2011).