Association of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment with down-regulation of key regulators involved in embryonic implantation in mice

Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology - Medical Science

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 535-542

  Xiong, Min ^a   Zhang, Hanwang ^a   Jin, Lei ^a   Ai, Jihui ^a   Huang, Zhiyong ^a   Zhu, Guijin ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Cdh1; Ctnnb1; E cadherin; Endometrial receptivity; GnRH analog; Hoxa11; Meis1

Indexed keywords

GONADORELIN; GONADOTROPIN; HORMONE ANTAGONIST;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DOWN REGULATION; DRUG EFFECT; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; OVULATION INDUCTION;

ANIMALS; DOWN-REGULATION; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE; GONADOTROPINS; HORMONE ANTAGONISTS; HUMANS; MICE; OVULATION INDUCTION;

EID: 80455155227     PISSN: 16720733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-011-0486-0     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Santos MA, Kuijk EW, Macklon NS. The impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the developing embryo. Reproduction, 2010,139(1):23-34
2. Smitz J, Devroey P, Camus M, et al. The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT. Hum Reprod, 1988,3(5):585-590
3. Griesinger G, Felberbaum R, Diedrich K. GnRH-antag onists in reproductive medicine. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005,273(2):71-78
4. Hayden C. GnRH analogues: applications in assisted reproductive techniques. Eur J Endocrinol, 2008, 159 (Suppl 1):S17-S25
5. Kolibianakis EM, Kalogeropoulou L, Griesinger G, et al. Among patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for in vitro fertilization, is the addition of recombinant LH associated with the probability of live birth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update, 2007,13:(5):445-452 (Pubitemid 47299851)
6. Tarlatzis BC, Kolibianakis EM. GnRH agonists vs antagonists. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 21(1):57-65
7. Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod, 2005,20(5):1158-1176 (Pubitemid 40790238)
8. Nygren KG, Andersen AN. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. European IVF-Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod, 2001,16(2):384-391
9. Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Devroey P, et al. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update, 2007,13(4):365-377 (Pubitemid 47062829)
10. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Chase J, et al. Comparison of pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer between the donors and the recipients in a donor oocyte program. J Assist Reprod Genet, 1992,9(3): 248-250
11. Stafford-Bell MA, Copeland CM. Surrogacy in Australia: implantation rates have implications for embryo quality and uterine receptivity. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2001,13(1): 99-104 (Pubitemid 32755406)
12. Behrsin RF, da Silva Junior CT, Gabetto JM, et al. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS): criteria for selecting patient in Antonio Pedro Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niter i city, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2003,49(3):274-277
13. Fauser BC, Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2003,14(5):236-242 (Pubitemid 36841482)
14. Simon C, Cano F, Valbuena D, et al. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod, 1995,10(9):2432-2437
15. van der Gaast MH, Classen-Linke I, Krusche CA, et al. Impact of ovarian stimulation on mid-luteal endometrial tissue and secretion markers of receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008,17(4):553-563
16. Haouzi D, Assou S, Dechanet C, et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization alters endometrial receptivity in humans: protocol effects. Biol Reprod, 2010,82(4):679-686
17. Koler M, Achache H, Tsafrir A, et al. Disrupted gene pattern in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. Hum Reprod, 2009,24(10):2541-2548
18. Mansouri-Attia N, Aubert J, Reinaud P, et al. Gene expression profiles of bovine caruncular and intercaruncular endometrium at implantation. Physiol Genomics, 2009, 39(1):14-27
19. Ruan HC, Zhu XM, Luo Q, et al. Ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially restores the expression of endometrial integrin beta3 and leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improves uterine receptivity in mice. Hum Reprod, 2006,21(10):2521-2529 (Pubitemid 44542142)
20. Van Vaerenbergh I, Van Lommel L, Ghislain V, et al. In GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles, advanced endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte retrieval correlates with altered gene expression. Hum Reprod, 2009,24(5):1085-1091
21. Zhang X, Bocca S, Franchi A, et al. Do GnRH analogues directly affect human endometrial epithelial cell gene expression? Mol Hum Reprod, 2010,16(5):347-60
22. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell, 1992,68(2):283-302
23. Taylor HS, Vanden Heuvel GB, Igarashi P. A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system: late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes. Biol Reprod, 1997,57(6): 1338-1345 (Pubitemid 27516636)
24. Taylor HS. A regulatory element of the empty spiracles homeobox gene is composed of three distinct conserved regions that bind regulatory proteins. Mol Reprod Dev, 1998,49(3):246-253 (Pubitemid 28080158)
25. Taylor HS, Igarashi P, Olive DL, et al. Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in the human peri-implantation endometrium. J Clin Endocr Metab, 1999,84(3):1129-1135 (Pubitemid 29138254)
26. Gendron RL, Paradis H, Hsieh-Li HM, et al. Abnormal uterine stromal and glandular function associated with maternal reproductive defects in Hoxa-11 null mice. Biol Reprod, 1997,56(5):1097-1105 (Pubitemid 27184491)
27. Taylor HS. The role of HOX genes in the development and function of the female reproductive tract. Semin Reprod Med, 2000,18(1):81-89 (Pubitemid 32182824)
28. Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Weinstein M, et al. Hoxa 11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development, 1995,121(5): 1373-1385
29. Argiropoulos B, Yung E, Humphries RK. Unraveling the crucial roles of Meis1 in leukemogenesis and normal hematopoiesis. Genes Dev, 2007,21(22):2845-2849 (Pubitemid 350133432)
30. Sarno JL, Kliman HJ, Taylor HS. HOXA10, Pbx2, and Meis1 protein expression in the human endometrium: Formation of multimeric complexes on HOXA10 target genes. J Clin Endocr Metab, 2005,90(1):522-528 (Pubitemid 40116703)
31. Xu B, Geerts D, Qian K, et al. Myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1 (MEIS) 1 involvement in embryonic implantation. Hum Reprod, 2008,23(6):1394-1406 (Pubitemid 351770569)
32. Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update, 2006,12(6):731-746 (Pubitemid 44605511)
33. Ozawa M, Engel J, Kemler R. Single amino acid substitutions in one Ca2+ binding site of uvomorulin abolish the adhesive function. Cell, 1990,63(5):1033-1038 (Pubitemid 120034944)
34. Ozawa M, Kemler R. Molecular organization of the uvomorulin- catenin complex. J Cell Biol, 1992,116(4):989-996
35. Kemler R. From cadherins to catenins: cytoplasmic protein interactions and regulation of cell adhesion. Trends Genet, 1993,9(9):317-321 (Pubitemid 23271755)
36. Rosales C, O'Brien V, Kornberg L, et al. Signal transduction by cell adhesion receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1995,1242(1):77-98
37. Fujimoto J, Sakaguchi H, Hirose R, et al. Significance of sex steroids in roles of cadherin subfamily and its related proteins in the uterine endometrium and placenta. Horm Res, 1998,50(Suppl 2):S30-S36
38. Larue L, Ohsugi M, Hirchenhain J, et al. E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994,91(17):8263-8267 (Pubitemid 24253927)
39. Ohsugi M, Butz S, Kemler R. Beta-catenin is a major tyrosine- phosphorylated protein during mouse oocyte maturation and preimplantation development. Dev Dyn, 1999,216(2):168-176 (Pubitemid 29471179)
40. Paria BC, Zhao XM, Das SK, et al. Zonula occludens-1 and E-cadherin are coordinately expressed in the mouse uterus with the initiation of implantation and decidualization. Dev Biol, 1999,208(2):488-501 (Pubitemid 29184006)
41. Jeong JW, Lee HS, Franco HL, et al. beta-catenin mediates glandular formation and dysregulation of beta-catenin induces hyperplasia formation in the murine uterus. Oncogene, 2009,28(1):31-40
42. Deutscher E, Yao HH-C. Essential roles of mesenchyme- derived Beta-catenin in mouse Müllerian duct morphogenesis. Dev Biol, 2007,307(2):227-236 (Pubitemid 47008916)
43. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods, 2001,25(4):402-408 (Pubitemid 34164012)
44. Chegini N, Rong H, Dou Q, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and GnRH receptor gene expression in human myometrium and leiomyomata and the direct action of GnRH analogs on myometrial smooth muscle cells and interaction with ovarian steroids in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1996,81(9):3215-3221 (Pubitemid 26296191)
45. Cheon KW, Lee HS, Parhar IS, et al. Expression of the second isoform of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH-II) in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod, 2001,7(5):447-452 (Pubitemid 32447770)
46. Grundker C, Gunthert AR, Millar RP, et al. Expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone II (GnRH-II) receptor in human endometrial and ovarian cancer cells and effects of GnRH-II on tumor cell proliferation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002,87(3):1427-1430 (Pubitemid 36121120)
47. Raga F, Casan EM, Kruessel JS, et al. Quantitative gonadotropin- releasing hormone gene expression and immunohistochemical localization in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Bio Reprod, 1998,59(3): 661-669 (Pubitemid 28395084)
48. Dey SK. Focus on implantation. Reproduction, 2004, 128(6):655-656 (Pubitemid 40028541)
49. Cakmak H, Taylor HS. Molecular mechanisms of treatment resistance in endometriosis: The role of progesterone- Hox gene interactions. Semin Reprod Med, 2010, 28(1):69-74
50. Sarno J, Schatz F, Huang SJ, et al. Thrombin and interleukin- 1beta decrease HOX gene expression in human first trimester decidual cells: implications for pregnancy loss. Mol Hum Reprod, 2009,15(7):451-457
51. Ertzeid G, Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod, 2001,16(2):221-225 (Pubitemid 32149411)
52. Fossum GT, Davidson A, Paulson RJ. Ovarian hyperstimulation inhibits embryo implantation in the mouse. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf, 1989,6(1):7-10 (Pubitemid 19077284)
53. Singh H, Aplin JD. Adhesion molecules in endometrial epithelium: tissue integrity and embryo implantation. J Anat, 2009,215(1):3-13
54. Wang X, Matsumoto H, Zhao X, et al. Embryonic signals direct the formation of tight junctional permeability barrier in the decidualizing stroma during embryo implantation. J Cell Sci, 2004,117(Pt 1):53-62 (Pubitemid 38072120)
55. Konac E, Alp E, Onen HI, et al. Endometrial mRNA expression of matrix metalloproteinases, their tissue inhibitors and cell adhesion molecules in unexplained infertility and implantation failure patients. Reprod Biomed Online, 2009,19(3):391-397.