Plant grafting and its application in biological research

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 56, Issue 33, 2011, Pages 3511-3517

  Wang, YouQun ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

grafting; long distance signaling; translocation of substances

Indexed keywords

EID: 80355147366     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-011-4816-1     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Yeoman M M, Brown R. Implacations of the formation of the graft union for organisation in the intact plant. Ann Bot, 1976, 40: 1265-1276.
2. Yeoman M M, Kilpatrick D C, Miedzybrodzka M B, et al. Cellular interactions during graft formation in plants: A recognition phenomenon? Symp Soc Exp Biol, 1978, 32: 139-160.
3. Kollmann R, Yang S, Glockmann R. Studies on graft unions II. Continuous and half plasmodesmata in different regions of the graft interface. Protoplasma, 1985, 126: 19-29.
4. Moore R, Walker D B. Studies of vegetative compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. VI. Grafting of Sedum and Solanum callus tissue in vitro. Protoplasma, 1983, 115: 114-121.
5. Moore R. Graft incompatibility between pear and quince: The influence of metabolites of Cydonia oblonga on suspension cultures of Pyrus communis. Am J Bot, 1986, 73: 1-4.
6. Gebhardt K, Goldbach H. Establishment, graft union characteristics and growth of Prunus micrografts. Physiol Plant, 1988, 72: 153-159.
7. Russo P, Slack S A. Tissue culture methods for the screening and analysis of putative virus-resistant transgenic potato plants. Phytopathology, 1998, 88: 437-441.
8. Parkinson M, Yeoman M M. Graft formation in cultured, explanted internodes. New Phytol, 1982, 91: 711-719.
9. Wang Y Q. Histologische, cytologische und transport-physiologische Untersuchungen an In-vitro-Pfropflingen unterschiedlicher Kompatibilität. Aachen: Shaker Press, 1992.
10. Tsukaya N, Natio S, Rédei G P, et al. A new class of mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana, acaulisI, affecting the development of both inflorescences and leaves. Development, 1993, 118: 751-764.
11. Turnbull C G N, Booker J P, Leyser H M O. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2002, 32: 255-262.
12. Rhee S Y, Somerville C R. Flat-surface grafting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1995, 13: 118-123.
13. Moore R. Physiological aspects of graft formation. In: Moore R, ed. Vegetative Compatibility Responses in Plants. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 1983. 89-105.
14. McCully M E. Structural aspects of graft development. In: Moore R, ed. Vegetative Compatibility Responses in Plants. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 1983. 71-78.
15. Tiedemann R. Graft union development and symplastic phloem contact in the heterograft Cucumis sativus on Cucurbita ficifolia. J Plant Physiol, 1989, 134: 427-440.
16. Moore R, Walker D B. Studies of vegetative compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. I. A structural study of a compatible autograft in Sedum telephoides (Crassulaceae). Am J Bot, 1981, 68: 820-830.
17. Stoddard F L, McCully M E. Histology of the development of the graft union in pea roots. Can J Bot, 1979, 57: 1486-1501.
18. Kollmann R, Glockmann C. Studies on graft unions. I. Plasmodesmata between cells of plants belonging to different unrelated taxa. Protoplasma, 1985, 124: 224-235.
19. Jeffree C E, Yeoman M M. Development of intercellular connection between opposing cells in a graft union. New Phytol, 1983, 93: 491-509.
20. Wang Y, Kollmann R. Vascular differentiation in the graft union of in-vitro grafts with different compatibility-Structural and functional aspects. J Plant Physiol, 1996, 147: 521-533.
21. Monzer J, Kollmann R. Vascular connections in the heterograft Lophophora williamsii Coult. on Trichocereus spachianus Rice. J Plant Physiol, 1986, 123: 359-372.
22. Kollmann R, Glockmann C. Sieve elements of graft unions. In: Behnke H D, Sjolund R D, eds. Sieve Elements. Comparative Structure, Induction and Development. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Press, 1990. 219-237.
23. Deloire A, Hébant C. Peroxidase activity and lignification at the interface between stock and scion of compatible and incompatible grafts of Capsicum on Lycopersicum. Ann Bot, 1982, 49: 887-891.
24. Gur A, Samish R M, Lifshitz E. The role of the cyanogenic glycoside of the quince in the incompatibility between pear cultivars and quince rootstocks. Hort Res, 1968, 8: 113-134.
25. Roberts J R, Brown R. The development of the graft union. J Exp Bot, 1961, 12: 294-302.
26. Moore R. Studies of vegetative compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. IV. The development of tensile strength in a compatible and incompatible graft. Am J Bot, 1983, 70: 226-231.
27. Yang S, Xiang G, Zhang S, et al. Electrical resistance as a measure of graft union. J Plant Physiol, 1992, 141: 98-104.
28. Turquois N, Malone M. Non-destructive assessment of developing hydraulic connections in the graft union of tomato. J Exp Bot, 1996, 47: 701-707.
29. Fernández-García N, Carvajal M, Olmos E. Graft union formation in tomato plants: Peroxidase and catalase involvement. Ann Bot, 2004, 93: 53-60.
30. Parkinson M, Jeffree C E, Yeoman M M. Incompatibility in cultured explantgrafts between members of' the Solanaceae. New Phytol, 1987, 107: 489-498.
31. De Stigter H C M. Parallelism between the transport of 14C-photosynthates and the flowering response in grafted Silene armeria L. Z Pflanzenphysiol, 1966, 55: 11-19.
32. Rachow-Brandt G, Kollmann R. Studies on graft unions IV. Assimilate transport and sieve element restitution in homo- and heterografts. J Plant Physiol, 1992, 139: 579-583.
33. Grignon N, Touraine B, Durand M. 6(5)Carboxyfluorescein as a tracer of phloem sap translocation. Am J Bot, 1989, 76: 871-877.
34. Schöning U, Kollmann R. The function of phloem connections in regenerating in vitro-grafts. Bot Acta, 1994, 108: 56-62.
35. Tiedemann R, Carstens-Behrens U. Influence of grafting on the phloem protein patterns in Cucurbitaceae I. Additional phloem exudate in Cucumis sativus grafted on two Cucurbita species. J Plant Physiol, 1994, 143: 189-194.
36. Golecki B, Schulz A, Carstens-Behrens U, et al. Evidence for graft transmission of structural phloem proteins or their precursors in heterografts of Cucurbitaceae. Planta, 1998, 206: 630-640.
37. Golecki B, Schulz A, Thompson G A. Translocation of structural P proteins in the phloem. Plant Cell, 1999, 11: 127-140.
38. Yoo B C, Kragler F, Varkonyi-Gasic E, et al. A systemic small RNA signaling system in plants. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 1979-2000.
39. Xoconostle-Cázares B, Xiang Y, Ruiz-Medrano R, et al. Plant paralog to viral movement protein potentiates transport of mRNA into the phloem. Science, 1999, 283: 94-98.
40. Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cázares B, Lucas W J. Phloem long-distance transport of CmNACP mRNA: Implications for supracellular regulation in plants. Development, 1999, 126: 4405-4419.
41. Kim M, Caino W, Kessler S, et al. Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of homeobox fusion transcript in tomato. Science, 2001, 293: 287-289.
42. Banerjee A K, Lin T, Hannapel D J. Untranslated regions of a mobile transcript RNA metabolism. Plant Physiol, 2009, 151: 1831-1843.
43. Brodersen P, Voinnet O. The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants. Trends Genet, 2006, 22: 268-280.
44. Pant B D, Buhtz A, Kehr J, et al. MicroRNA 399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J, 2008, 53: 731-738.
45. Martin A, Adam H, Díaz-Mendoza M, et al. Graft-transmissible induction of potato tuberization by the microRNA miR172. Development, 2009, 136: 2873-2881.
46. Sunkar R, Zhu J K. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2001-2019.
47. Hsieh L C, Lin S I, Shih A C C, et al. Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol, 2009, 151: 2120-2132.
48. Buhtz A, Pieritz J, Springer F, et al. Phloem small RNAs. Nutrient stress responses, and systemic mobility. BMC Plant Biol, 2010, 10: 64.
49. Ryan C A, Pearce G. Systemin: A polypeptide signal for plant defensive genes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 1998, 14: 1-7.
50. McGurl B, Orozco-Cardenas M, Pearce G, et al. Overexpression of the prosystemin gene in transgenic tomato plants generates a systemic signal that constitutively induces proteinase inhibitor synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 9799-9802.
51. Mouradov A, Cremer F, Coupland G. Control of flowering time: Interaction pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell, 2002, 14: 111-130.
52. Lin M K, Belanger H, Lee Y J, et al. Flowering locus T protein may act as the long-distance florigenic signal in the Cucurbits. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 1488-1506.
53. Noaguchi M, Abe M, Kimura T, et al. Long-distance, graft-transmissible action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T protein to promote flowering. Plant Cell Physiol, 2008, 49: 1645-1658.