Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: A two-stage multicountry approach

Scientometrics

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 887-917

  Wolszczak Derlacz, Joanna ^a   Parteka, Aleksandra ^a  

^a GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Higher education; Research output; Two stage DEA

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255136307     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0484-9     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 89-97.
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2008). The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by means of non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76(2), 225-244.
3. Agasisti, T., & DalBianco, A. (2006). Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and political implications. International Journal of Business Performance, 8(4), 344-367.
4. Agasisti, T., & Johnes, G. (2009). Beyond frontiers: Comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across countries. Education Economics, 17(1), 59-79.
5. Agasisti, T., & Salerno, C. (2007). Assessing the cost efficiency of Italian universities. Education Economics, 15(4), 455-471.
6. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2009). The governance and performance of research universities: Evidence from Europe and the US, NBER Working Paper No. 14851.
7. Alexander, W. R. J., Haug, A. A., & Jaforullah, M. (2010). A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(2), 99-110.
8. Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
9. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2005). Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity. Scientometric, 63(1), 87-120.
10. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2007). Universities and strategic knowledge creation: Specialization and performance in Europe. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
11. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universities an application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 389-410.
12. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2007a). Efficiency and productivity in European universities: exploring trade-offs in the strategic profile, Chap. 5. In A. Bonaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.). Universities and strategic knowledge creation: Specialization and performance in Europe (pp. 144-206). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
13. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., Räty, T. & Simar, L. (2007b). Efficiency and university size: Discipline-wise evidence from European universities. MPRA Paper No. 10265, Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
14. Bonaccorsi, A., Brandt, T., De Filippo, D., Lepori, B., Molinari, F., Niederl, A., Schmoch, U., Schubert, T., & Slipersaeter, S. (2010). Final study report. Feasibility study for creating a European university data collection. The European Communities.
15. Carrington, R., Coelli, T., & Rao, P. D. S. (2005). The performance of Australian universities: Conceptual issues and preliminary results. Economic Papers-Economic Society of Australia, 24(2), 145-163.
16. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
17. Cohn, E., Rhine, S. L. W., & Santos, M. C. (1989). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: economies of scale and scope. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 284-290.
18. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Kaoru, T. (2000). Data envelopment analysis. A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. Boston/Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., Geuna, A., Lepori, B., Bach, L., Bogetoft, P., et al. (2011). The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the aquameth project. Research Policy, 40(1), 148-164.
20. Fandel, G. (2007). On the performance of universities in north rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government? Redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 521-533.
21. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(3), 253-290.
22. Felderer, B., & Obersteiner, M. (1999). Efficiency and economies of scale in academic knowledge production, Economics Series no. 63, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.
23. Ferrari, G., & Laureti, T. (2005). Evaluating technical efficiency of human capital formation in the Italian university: Evidence from florence. Statistical Methods and Applications, 14(2), 243-270.
24. Flegg, A. T., Allen, D. O., Field, K., & Thurlow, T. W. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of British universities: A multi-period data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 12(3), 231-249.
25. Gattoufi, S., Becker D., Chandel, J. K, & Sander, M. (2010). Deabib. org: A bibliographic database about data envelopment analysis. Version 0. 70.
26. Glass, J. C., McKillop, D. G., & Hyndman, N. S. (1995). Efficiency in the provision of university teaching and research: an empirical analysis of UK universities. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 61-72.
27. Izadi, H. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: The case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21, 63-71.
28. Johnes, J. (2006a). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 273-288.
29. Johnes, J. (2006b). Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK universities 1993. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 443-456.
30. Johnes, J., & Johnes, G. (1995). Research funding and performance in UK. University Departments of economics: A frontier analysis. Economics of Education Review, 14(3), 301-314.
31. Kempkes, G., & Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities: Some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Applied Economics, 42, 2063-2079.
32. Kirjavainen, T., & Loikkanen, H. A. (1998). Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review, 17, 377-394.
33. Leitner, K.-H., Prikoszovits, J., Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M., Stowasser, R., & Wagner, K. (2007). The impact of size and specialisation on universities' department performance: A DEA analysis applied to Austrian universities. Higher Education, 53, 517-538.
34. Mancebón, M.-J., & Bandrés, E. (1999). Efficiency evaluation in secondary schools: The key role of model specification and of ex post analysis of result. Education Economics, 7(2), 131-152.
35. Monchuk, D., Zhuo, Ch., & Bonaparte, Y. (2010). Explaining production inefficiency in China's agriculture using data envelopment analysis and semi-parametric bootstrapping. China Economic Review, 21, 346-354.
36. OECD (2002). Frascati manual. Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development, OECD, Paris.
37. Oliviera, M. A., & Santos, C. (2005). Assessing school efficiency in Portugal using FDH and bootstrapping. Applied Economics, 37, 957-968.
38. Parteka, A. & Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2011). Dynamics of productivity in higher education. Cross-European evidence based on bootstrapped Malmquist indices, University of Milan Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2011-10.
39. Räty, T. (2002). Efficient facet based efficiency index: A variable returns to scale specification. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 65-82.
40. Ray, S. C. (1991). Resource-use efficiency in public schools: A study of connecticut data. Management Scence, 37(12), 1620-1628.
41. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6), 779-802.
42. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31-64.
43. Tommaso, A., & Bianco, A. D. (2006). Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and policy implications. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 8(4), 344-367.
44. Unesco-IUS/OECD/Eurostat data collection manual. (2004). Data collection on education systems. OECD, Paris.
45. Warning, S. (2004). Performance differences in German higher education: empirical analysis of strategic group. Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 393-408.
46. Wilson, P. W. (1993). Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11(3), 319-323.
47. Wilson, P. W. (2008). FEAR: A software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(4), 247-254.
48. Wolszczak-Derlacz, J., & Parteka, A. (2010). Scientific productivity of public higher education institutions in Poland: A comparative bibliometric analysis. Warsaw: Ernst & Young.
49. Worthington, A. C. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9(3), 245-268.
50. Worthington, A. C., & Lee, B. L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003. Economics of Education Review, 27(3), 285-298.