Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: A didactical perspective

Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 115-135

  Balacheff, Nicolas ^a  

^a GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255125491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0576-5_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Arsac, G., & Mantes, M. (1997). Situations d'initiation au raisonnement déductif. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 21-43.
2. Balacheff, N. (1988). Une étude des processus de preuve en mathématique chez des éléves de Collège (Vols. 1 & 2). Thèse d'état. Grenoble: Université Joseph Fourier.
3. Balacheff, N. (2008). The role of the researcher's epistemology in mathematics education: an essay on the case of proof. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 501-512.
4. Balacheff, N., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (1995). Analyse du rôle de l'enseignant dans une situation de préceptorat à distance: TéléCabri. In R. Noirfalise, M.-J. Perrin-Glorian (Eds.) Actes de la VII Ecole d'été de didactique des mathématiques (pp. 47-56). Clermont-Ferrand: IREM de Clermont-Ferrand.
5. Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1996). Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1/2), 11-41.
6. Bishop, A. (1991). Mathematical culture and the child. In A. Bishop (Ed.) Mathematical encul-turation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education (pp. 82-91). Berlin: Springer.
7. Boero, P., Garuti, R., Lemut, E., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996a). Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: a hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems. Valencia, Spain: PME XX.
8. Boero, P., Garuti, R., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996b). Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures. Valencia, Spain: PME XX.
9. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on students conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. In C. Courtney (Ed.) Review of research in education. American Educational Research Association 16, 3-56.
11. Douady, A. (1986). Julia sets and the Mandelbrot set. In H.-O. Peitgen & P. H. Richter (Eds.), The beauty of fractals: images of complex dynamical systems (pp. 161-173). Berlin: Springer.
12. Douady, R. (1985). The interplay between different settings: Tool object dialectic in the extension of mathematical ability. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of the IX International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 33-52). Holland: Noodwijkerhout.
13. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Berne: Peter Lang.
14. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2002). Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (2001). Analyser l'usage didactique d'un EIAH en mathématiques: une tâche nécessairement complexe. Sciences et Techniques Educatives, 8(1/2), 61-74.
16. Habermas, J. (1999). Wahrheit und rechtfertigung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (French translation: Vérité et justification. Gallimard, Paris, 2001).
17. Hanna, G., & Jahnke, N. (1996). Proof and proving. In A. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877-908). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: an overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5-23.
19. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: results from exploratory studies. In A. Schonfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.) Research in collegiate mathematics education III. (Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 7, pp. 234-282). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
20. Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education., 31(4), 396-428.
21. Herbst, P. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in american school geometry: evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283-312.
22. Hillel, J. (1993). Computer algebra systems as cognitive technologies: implication for the practice of mathematics education. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning through computers: mathematics and educational technology (pp. 18-47). Berlin: Springer.
23. Hubbard, J. (2000). Preface to Tan Lei (Ed.) The Mandelbrot set, theme and variations (pp 1-8). London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 274. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mariotti, M. A. (1997). Justifying and proving in geometry: the mediation of a microworld. Revised and extended version of the version published in M. Hejny, & J. Novotna (Eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Mathematical Education (pp. 21-26). Prague: Prometheus Publishing House.
25. Forman, E. A., Mimick, N., & Stone, A. (1996). Contexts for learning: sociocultural dynamics in children's development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Noss, R., & Celia Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: learning cultures and computers. Berlin: Springer.
27. Pedemonte, B. (2002). Etude didactique et cognitive des rapports de l'argumentation et de la démonstration dans l'apprentissage des mathématiques. PhD Thesis, Grenoble: Université Joseph Fourier.
28. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
29. Reichel, H.-C. (2002). Lakatos and aspects of mathematical education. In G. Kampis, L. Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (Eds.), Appraising Lakatos: mathematics, methodology, and the man (pp. 255-260). Berlin: Springer.
30. Stewart, J. (1994). Un système cognitif sans neurones: les capacités d'adaptation, d'apprentissage et de mémoire du système immunitaire. Intellectika, 18, 15-43.
31. Sutherland, R., & Balacheff, N. (1999). Didactical complexity of computational environments for the learning of mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 1-26.
32. Trouche, L. (2003). Construction et conduite des instruments dans les apprentissages mathématiques: nécessité des orchestrations. Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches. Paris: Université de Paris VII.
33. Usiskin, Z. (2007). What should Not Be in the algebra and geometry curricula of average college-bound students? Mathematics Teacher, 100, 68-77.
34. Vergnaud, G. (1981). Quelques orientations théoriques et méthodologiques des recherches françaises en didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 2(2), 215-231.
35. Vergnaud, G. (1991). La théorie des champs conceptuels. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 10(2/3), 133-169.