Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of composite resin to amalgam

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 318-325

  Ozcan M ^a   Koolman, C ^b   Aladag, A ^c   Dundar M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Prosthodontics ^*

^c EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY PRIMER; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CLEARFIL PHOTO POSTERIOR; CLEARFIL ST; DENTAL ALLOY; EVERSTICK; METAL PRIMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOXYPROPYLTRIMETHOXYSILANE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; PHOTOBOND; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SINFONY COMPOSITE RESIN; THIOKETONE; VISIO BOND; VISIO-BOND; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION REPAIR; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SILANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THIONES; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 80155203683     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/10-294-L     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Giannini M, Paulilio LAMS & Ambrosano GMB (2002) Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems. Brazilian Dental Journal 13(3) 179-183.
2. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJM, Creugers NHJ & Burgersdijk RCW (2002) A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices.International Journal of Prosthodontics 15(6) 559-563.
3. Özcan M & Niedermeier W (2002) Clinical study on the reasons for location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. International Journal of Prosthodontics 15(3) 299-302.
4. Bader JD, Martin JA & Shugars DA (1995) Preliminary estimates of incidence and consequences of tooth fracture.Journal of American Dental Association 126(12) 1650-1654.
5. Heft MW, Gilbert GH, Dolan TA & Foerster U (2000) Restoration fractures, cusp fractures and root fragments in a diverse sample of adults: 24 months incidence.Journal of American Dental Association 131(10) 1459-1464.
6. Dijken van JW (2002) Three-year performance of calcium- , fluoride-, and hydroxyl-ions-releasing resin composite.Acta Odontologica Scandinavia 60(3) 155-159.
7. Morin D, Cross M, Voller VR, Douglas WH & DeLong R (1988) Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement. Dental Materials 4(2) 77-84.
8. Mjör IA & Gordan VV (2002) Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Operative Dentistry 27(5) 528-534. (Pubitemid 41558786)
9. Bichacho N, Pilo R, Brosh T, Berkovich M & Helft M (1995) Shear bond strength of composite resin to fresh amalgam. Operative Dentistry 20(2) 68-73.
10. Gordon M, Laufer BZ & Metzger Z (1985) Compositeveneered amalgam restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 54(6) 759-762.
11. Ruse ND, Sekimoto RT & Feduik D (1995) The effect of amalgam surface preparation on the shear bond strength between composite and amalgam. Operative Dentistry 20(5) 180-185.
12. Watts DC, Devlin H & Fletcher JE (1992) Bonding characteristics of a phosphonated anaerobic adhesive to amalgam. Journal of Dentistry 20(4) 245-249.
13. Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Huymans MC, Kalk W & Vahlberg T (2006) Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 17(1) 7-13. (Pubitemid 43042223)
14. Özcan M, Pfeiffer P & Nergiz I (1998) A brief history and current status of metal-and ceramic surface-conditioning concepts for resin bonding in dentistry. Quintessence International 29(11) 713-724. (Pubitemid 128687219)
15. Shen C, Speigel J & Mjör IA (2006) Repair strength of dental amalgams. Operative Dentistry 31(1) 122-126. (Pubitemid 43341811)
16. Özcan M & Kumbuloglu O (2009) Effect of composition, viscosity and thickness of the opaquer on the adhesion of resin composite to titanium. Dental Materials 25(10) 1248-1255.
17. Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Taira Y, Atsuta M & Shimoe S (2002) Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29(2) 121-126. (Pubitemid 41705058)
18. Kajihara H, Suzuki S, Kurashige H, Minesaki Y & Tanka T (2003) Bonding abutments to cast metal post/cores: Comparison of pre-treatment effects. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 30(2) 119-124. (Pubitemid 37255825)
19. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM & Dunne JT (2001) Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 86(5) 526-531. (Pubitemid 33624191)
20. Dündar M, Özcan M, Gökçe B, Cömlekoǧlu E, Leite F & Valandro LF (2007) Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dental Materials 23(5) 630-636. (Pubitemid 46442704)