Sub-optimal choice in pigeons does not depend on avoidance of the stimulus associated with the absence of reinforcement

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 282-287

  Stagner, Jessica P ^a   Laude, Jennifer R ^a   Zentall, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Avoidance; Gambling; Inhibition; Pigeons; Signaled reinforcement; Sub optimal choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155189581     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Américaine. Econometrica 1953, 21:503-546.
2. Belke T.W., Spetch M.L. Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1994, 62:353-366.
3. Berlyne D.E. Uncertainty and conflict: A point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. The Psychological Review 1957, 64:329-339.
4. Blanco C., Ibáñez A., Sáiz-Ruiz J., Blanco-Jerez C., Nunes E.V. Epistemology, pathophysiology, and treatment of pathological gambling. CNS Drugs 2000, 13:397-407.
5. Dinsmoor J.A. Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1983, 6:693-728.
6. Fantino E., Dunn R., Meck W. Percentage reinforcement and choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1979, 32:335-340.
7. Gipson C.D., Alessandri J.D., Miller H.C., Zentall T.R. Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons. Learning & Behavior 2009, 37:289-298.
8. Hearst E., Besley S., Farthing G.W. Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1970, 14:373-409.
9. Mazur J.E. Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting delay procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1996, 66:63-73.
10. Roberts W.A. Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 94:74-83.
11. Roper K.L., Zentall T.R. Observing behavior in pigeons: The effect of reinforcement probability and response cost using a symmetrical choice procedure. Learning and Motivation 1999, 30:201-220.
12. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL.
13. Spetch M.L., Belke T.W., Barnet R.C., Dunn R., Pierce W.D. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: Effects of signal condition and terminal link length. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1990, 53:219-234.
14. Spetch M.L., Mondloch M.V., Belke T.W., Dunn R. Determinants of pigeons' choice between certain and probabilistic outcomes. Animal Learning & Behavior 1994, 22:239-251.
15. Stagner J.P., Zentall T.R. Suboptimal choice behavior by pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:412-416.
16. Wasserman E.A., Franklin S.R., Hearst E. Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1974, 86:616-627.
17. Zentall T.R., Stagner J.P. Maladaptive choice behavior by pigeons: An animal analog of gambling (sub-optimal human decision making behavior). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278:1203-1208.
18. Zentall T.R., Stagner J.P. Maladaptive choice behavior by pigeons: The Allais paradox. Learning and Motivation 2011, 42:245-254.