Maladaptive choice behaviour by pigeons: An animal analogue and possible mechanism for gambling (sub-optimal human decision-making behaviour)

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1709, 2011, Pages 1203-1208

  Zentall, Thomas R ^a   Stagner, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice behaviour; Gambling; Humans; Pigeons; Signalling reinforcement

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AVIFAUNA; BIRD; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GAMBLING; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; OPTIMUM FORAGING THEORY; SIGNALING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGEONS AND DOVES; REWARD;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLUMBIDAE; GAMBLING; REWARD;

EID: 79960050408     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1607     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beach, L. R. & Lipshitz, R. 1996 Why a new perspective on decision making is needed. In Decision making in the workplace: a unified perspective (ed. L. R. Beach), pp. 21-32. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bergler, E. 1957 The psychology of gambling. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
3. Wagenaar, W. A. 1988 Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. East Sussex, UK: Erlbaum.
4. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. 1974 Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124-1131. (doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124)
5. Breen, R. B. & Zuckerman, M. 1999 'Chasing' in gambling behaviour: personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences 27, 1097-1111. (doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00052-5)
6. Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F. & Gray, N. 2009 Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron 61, 481-490. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.031)
7. Gilovich, T. 1991 How we know what isn't so. New York, NY: The Free Press.
8. Shaffer, H. J. & Hall, M. N. 2001 Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Can. J. Public Health 92, 168-172.
9. Raylu, N. & Oei, T. P. S. 2002 Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 22, 1009-1061. (doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00101-0)
10. Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. 1986 Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. MacArthur, R. H. & Pianka, E. R. 1966 On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100, 603-609. (doi:10.1086/282454)
12. Dinsmoor, J. A. 1983 Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behav. Brain Sci. 6, 693-728. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X00017969)
13. Roper, K. L. & Zentall, T. R. 1999 Observing behavior in pigeons: the effect of reinforcement probability and response cost using a symmetrical choice procedure. Learn. Motivation 30, 201-220. (doi:10.1006/lmot.1999.1030)
14. Gipson, C. D., Alessandri, J. D., Miller, H. C. & Zentall, T. R. 2009 Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons. Learn. Behav. 37, 289-298. (doi:10.3758/LB.37.4.289)
15. Stagner, J. P. & Zentall, T. R. 2010 Suboptimal choice behavior by pigeons. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 412-416. (doi:10.3758/PBR.17.3.412)
16. Belke, T. W. & Spetch, M. L. 1994 Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: preference for unreliable reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 62, 353-366. (doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.62-353)
17. Fantino, E., Dunn, R. & Meck, W. 1979 Percentage reinforcement and choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 32, 335-340. (doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.32-335)
18. Mazur, J. E. 1996 Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting delay procedure. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 66, 63-73. (doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63)
19. Kacelnik, A. & Bateson, M. 1996 Risky theories: the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Am. Zool. 36, 402-434. (doi:10.1093/icb/36.4.402)
20. Weatherly, J. N. & Drenne, A. 2007 Rats playing a slot machine: a preliminary attempt at an animal gambling model. Anal. Gambling Behav. 1, 79-89.
21. Mazur, J. E. 1987 An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (eds M. Commons, J. Mazur, J. Nevin & H. Rachlin), pp. 55-73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Ainslie, G. W. 1975 Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulsive control. Psychol. Bull. 82, 463-496. (doi:10.1037/h0076860)
23. Ackert, L. F., Charupat, N., Church, B. K. & Deaves, R. 2006 An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Exp. Econ. 9, 5-16. (doi:10.1007/s10683-006-1467-1)
24. Zentall, T. R., Clement, T. S., Friedrich, A. M. & DiGian, K. A. 2006 Stimuli signaling rewards that follow a less preferred event are themselves preferred: implications for cognitive dissonance. In Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence (eds E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall), pp. 651-667. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979 Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291. (doi:10.2307/1914185)