Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Law

The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Smith, Rogers M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Historical institutionalism; James March; Johan Olsen; Judges; Law; Political science; Politics; Public law

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155167286     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0004     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. ACKERMAN, B. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2. AMAR, A. R. 2005. America's Constitution: A Biography. New York: Random House.
3. BERGER, S. (ed.) 1981. Organizing Interests in Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. BERMAN, S. 1998. The Social Democratic Movement: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
5. BLYTH, M. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. BURGESS, S. R. 1993. Beyond instrumental politics: the new institutionalism, legal rhetoric, and judicial supremacy. Polity, 25: 445-59.
7. BUSSIERE, E. 1997. (Dis)entitling the poor: The Warren Court, welfare rights, and the American political tradition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
8. CLAYTON, C. W. 1999. The Supreme Court and political jurisprudence: new and old institutionalisms. Pp. 15-41 in Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. C. W. Clayton and H. Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. CLAYTON, C. W. and GILLMAN, H. (eds.) 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. DI MAGGIO, P. J., and POWELL, W. W. 1991. Introduction. Pp. 1-38 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. FRYMER, P. 2003. Acting when elected officials won't: federal courts and civil rights enforcement in U.S. labor unions, 1935-85. American Political Science Review, 97: 483-99.
12. GILLMAN, H. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13. GILLMAN, H. 1999. The Court as an idea, not a building (or a game): interpretive institutionalism and the analysis of Supreme Court decision-making. In Clayton and Gillman 1999: 65-87.
14. GILLMAN, H. 2002. How political parties can use the courts to advance their agendas: federal courts in the United States, 1875-1891. American Political Science Review, 96: 511-24.
15. GILLMAN, H. and CLAYTON, C. 1999. The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
16. GRABER, M. A. 1993. The nonmajoritarian difficulty: legislative deference to the judiciary. Studies in American Political Development, 7: 35-73.
17. HALL, P. A., and TAYLOR, R. C. R. 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44: 936-57.
18. HALL, P. A. 1997. The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized nations. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. M. I. Lichbach and A. S. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. HIRSCHL, R. 2004. Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
20. KATZNELSON, I., and WEINGAST, B. R. 2005. Intersections between historical and rational choice institutionalism. In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, ed. I. Katznelson and B. R. Weingast. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21. KECK, T. M. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. KRASNER, S. D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials, Investments and the U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. LOVELL, G. I. 2003. Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. MC MAHON, K. J. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. MARCH, J. G., and OLSEN, J. P. 1984. The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78: 734-49.
26. MARCH, J. G., and OLSEN, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
27. MEYER, J. W., BOLI, J., and THOMAS, G. M. 1987. Ontology and rationalization in the western account. In Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, ed. J. W. Meyer, J. Boli, and G. M. Thomas. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
28. NOVKOV, J. 2001. Constituting Workers, Protecting Women: Gender, Law, and Labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal Years. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. ORREN, K., and SKOWRONEK, S. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. PICKERILL, J. M. 2004. Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. PIERSON, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. SHAPIRO, M. 1964. Law and Politics in the Supreme Court. New York: Free Press.
33. SHAPIRO, M. 1989. Political jurisprudence, public law, and post-consequentialist ethics: comment on Professors Barber and Smith. Studies in American Political Development, 3: 88-102.
34. SHEPSLE, K., and WEINGAST, B. 1983. Institutionalizing majority rule: a social choice theory with policy implications. American Economic Review, 73: 357-72.
35. SKOCPOL, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. SKOCPOL, T. 1995. Why I am an historical institutionalist. Polity, 28: 105.
37. SKOWRONEK, S. 1982. Building a New American State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. SKRENTNY, J. D. 2006. Law and the American state. Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 213-44.
39. SMITH, R. M. 1988. Political jurisprudence, the "new institutionalism," and the future of public law. American Political Science Review, 82: 89-108.
40. SMITH, R. M. 1992. If politics matters: implications for a "new institutionalism.". Studies in American Political Development, 6: 1-36.
41. SMITH, R. M. 2006. Which comes first, the ideas or the institutions?. Pp. 91-113 in Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, ed. I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, and D. Galvin. New York: New York University Press.
42. STONE, A. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. STREECK, W. and THELEN, K. 2005. Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. Pp. 1-39 in Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. W. Streeck and K. Thelen. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. THELEN, K., and STEINMO, S. 1992. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Pp. 1-32 in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, ed. S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. WHITTINGTON, K. E. 2005. "Interpose your friendly hand:" political support for the exercise of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 99: 583-96.