Comparative spray deposits by manually pulled trolley sprayer and a spray gun in greenhouse tomato crops

Crop Protection

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 119-124

  Sánchez Hermosilla, Julián ^a   Rincón, Víctor J ^a   Páez, Francisco ^a   Fernández, Milagros ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b Andalusian Government   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crop protection; Greenhouse; Manually pulled trolley sprayer; Spray gun

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; CANOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FRUIT; PRESSURE EFFECT; SOIL TYPE; SPRAY; VOLUME;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 80155147369     PISSN: 02612194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Balsari P., Marucco P., Tamagnone M. A system to assess the mass balance of spray applied to tree crops. Trans. ASAE 2005, 48:1689-1694.
2. Balsari P., Marucco P., Tamagnone M. A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk. Crop Prot. 2007, 26:1482-1489.
3. Braekman P., Foque D., Messens W., van Labeke M.-C., Pieters J.G., Nuyttens D. Effect of spray application technique on spray deposition in greenhouse strawberries and tomatoes. Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66:203-212.
4. Braekman P., Foqué D., van Labeke M., Pieters J.G., Nuyttens D. Influence of spray application technique on spray deposition in greenhouse ivy pot plants grown on hanging shelves. HortScience 2009, 44:1921-1927.
5. Cabrera A.M., Marzo B., Uclés D., Molina J., Gázquez J.C., García R. Análisis de la campaña hortofrutícola de Almería. Campaña 2009/2010 2010, Fundación Cajamar, Almería.
6. Cross J.V., Murray R.A., Ridout M.S., Walklate P.J. Quantification of spray deposits and their variability on apple trees. Aspects Appl. Biol. 1997, 48:217-224.
7. Cunningham G.P., Harden J. Reducing spray volumes applied to mature citrus trees. Crop Prot. 1998, 17:289-292.
8. Derksen R.C., Miller S.A., Ozkan H.E., Fox R.D. Spray Deposition Characteristics on Tomatoes and Disease Management as Influenced by Droplet Size, Spray Volume, and Air-assistance 2001, 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting.
9. Derksen R.C., Zhu H., Ozkan H.E., Hammond R.B., Dorrance A.E., Spongberg A.L. Determining the influence of spray quality, nozzle type, spray volume, and air-assisted application strategies on deposition of pesticides in soybean canopy. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51:1529-1537.
10. Farooq M., Salyani M. Spray penetration into the citrus tree canopy from two air-carrier sprayers. Trans. ASAE 2002, 45:1287-1293.
11. Garzón E., López L., Sánchez-Hermosilla J., Barranco P., Agüera L., Cabello T. Eficacia técnica de la aplicación de fitosanitarios con cañón atomizador. Vida Rural 2000, 112:44-48.
12. Gil E., Escolà A., Rosell J.R., Planas S., Val L. Variable rate application of plant protection products in vineyard using ultrasonic sensors. Crop Prot. 2007, 26:1287-1297.
13. González R., Rodríguez F., Sánchez-Hermosilla J., García J. Navigation techniques for mobile robots in greenhouses. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2009, 25:153-165.
14. Guzmán J.L., Rodríguez F., Sáchez-Hermosilla J., Berenguel M. Robust pressure control in a mobile robot for spraying tasks. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51:715-727.
15. Jamar L., Mostade O., Huyghebaert B., Pigeon O., Lateur M. Comparative performance of recycling tunnel and conventional sprayers using standard and drift-mitigating nozzles in dwarf apple orchards. Crop Prot. 2010, 29:561-566.
16. Lee A.W., Miller P.C.H., Power J.D. The application of pesticide sprays to tomato crops. Aspects Appl. Biol. 2000, 57:383-390.
17. Medina R., Sánchez-Hermosilla J., Agüera F., Gázquez J.C. Deposition analysis of several application volumes of pesticides adapted to the growth of a greenhouse tomato crop. Acta Hort. 2005, 691:179-186.
18. Nuyttens D., Braekman P., Windey S., Sonck B. Potential dermal pesticide exposure affected by greenhouse spray application technique. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65:781-790. 10.1002/ps.1755.
19. Nuyttens D., Windey S., Sonck B. Comparison of operator exposure for five different greenhouse spraying applications. J. Agric. Saf. Health 2004, 10:187-195.
20. Nuyttens D., Windey S., Sonck B. Optimisation of a vertical spray boom for greenhouse spray applications. Biosyst. Eng. 2004, 89:417-423.
21. Panneton B., Piché M. Interaction between application volume, airflow, and spray quality in air-assisted spraying. Trans. ASAE 2005, 48:37-44.
22. Pergher G. Recovery rate of tracer dyes used for spray deposit assessment. Trans. ASAE 2001, 44:787-794.
23. Pergher G., Balsari P., Cerruto E., Vieri M. The relationship between vertical spray patterns from air-assisted sprayers and foliar deposits in vine canopies. Aspects Appl. Biol. 2002, 66:323-330.
24. Pergher G., Gubiani R., Tonetto G. Foliar deposition and pesticide losses from three air-assisted sprayers in a hedgerow vineyard. Crop Prot. 1997, 16:25-33.
25. Pergher G., Zucchiatti N., Gubiani R. Influence of spray application parameters on deposition in an asparagus crop. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1999, 73:19-28.
26. Planas, S., Fillant, A., Escolá, A., 2001. Avances en la aplicación de fitosanitarios en cultivos protegidos. 1er Congreso nacional de ingeniería para la agricultura y el medio rural. pp. 275-280.
27. Salyani M., Sweeb R.D., Farooq M. Comparison of string and ribbon samplers in orchard spray applications. Trans. ASABE 2006, 49:1705-1710.
28. Sánchez-Hermosilla J., Medina R., Gázquez J.C. Improvements in Pesticide Application in Greenhouses 2003, Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Spray Application Techniques in Fruit Growing. Cuneo, Italy, pp. 54-61.
29. Sánchez-Hermosilla J., Medina R., Rodríguez F., Callejón A. Use of food dyes as tracers to measure multiple spray deposits by ultraviolet-visible absorption spectrophotometry. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51:1177-1186.
30. Sánchez-Hermosilla J., Rodríguez F., González R., Guzmán J.L., Berenguel M. A mechatronic description of an autonomous mobile robot for agricultural tasks in greenhouses. Mobile Robots Navigation 2010, 583-608. In-Tech, Croatia. A. Barrera (Ed.).
31. van Os E.A., Michielsen J.M.G.P., Corver F.J.M., van den Berg J.V., Bruins M.A., Porskamp H.A.J., van de Zande J.C. Reduction of spray pressure leads to less emission and better deposition of spray liquid at high-volume spraying in greenhouse tomato. Acta Hort 2005, 691:187-194.