A Two-Step Approach to Analyze Satisfaction Data

Social Indicators Research

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 545-554

  Ferrari, Pier Alda ^a   Pagani, Laura ^b   Fiorio, Carlo V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clustered data; Eurobarometer; Multilevel models; Nonlinear principal component analysis; Services of general interest

Indexed keywords

NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRICE DYNAMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PUBLIC SERVICE;

EID: 80155142402     PISSN: 03038300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9761-x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Borra, S., & Chiavarini, S. (2005). Multilevel models for perceived quality analysis: The case of local public transport of Rome. Statistica & Applicazioni, vol. III, Numero Speciale 1, 45-52.
2. Colin Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics, methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Conway, P., & Nicoletti, G. (2006). Product market regulation in non-manufacturing sectors in OECD countries: Measurement and highlights, OECD Economics Department Working Paper.
4. Eurobarometer (2002). Report No. 58 Consumers' opinions about services of general interest, December.
5. Ferrari, P. A., Annoni, P., & Manzi, G. (2010). Evaluation and comparison of European countries: Public opinion on services. Quality & Quantity, 44(6), 1191-1205.
6. Fiorio, C. V., Florio, M., Salini, S., Ferrari, P.(2007). European consumers attitudes on services of general interest: Accessibility, price and quality. In M. Marrelli, F. Padovano, I. Rizzo (Eds.), SERVIZI PUBBLICI: Nuove tendenze nella regolamentazione, nella produzione e nel finanziamento. Milano: Franco Angeli.
7. Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
8. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
9. Goldstein, H., & Spiegelhalter, D. (1996). League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance-with discussion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 159, 385-443.
10. Grilli, L., & Rampichini, C. (2003). Alternative specifications of multivariate multilevel probit ordinal response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, n. 1.
11. Grilli L., & Rampichini, C. (2007). Multilevel factor models for ordinal variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 1-25.
12. Heiser, W. J., & Meulman, J. J. (1994). Homeogeneity analysis: Exploring the distribution of variables and their nonlinear relationships. In M. J. Greenacre, J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences: Recent developments and applications (pp. 179-209). New York: Academic Press, Harcourt Brace & Company.
13. Joreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modelling with latent variables: Historical and competitive aspects. In K. G. Joreskog, H. Wald (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation, Part 1 (pp. 263-270). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. Michailidis, G., & De Leeuw, J (1998). The Gifi system of descriptive multivariate analysis. Statistical Science, 13, 307-336.
15. Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides, R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-33). US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM manual. U. C. Berkeley division of biostatistics working paper series. Working Paper 160.
17. Rampichini, C., Grilli, L., & Petrucci, A. (2004) Analysis of university course evaluations: From descriptive measures to multilevel models. Statistical Methods & Applications, 13(3), 357-373.
18. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publishers.
19. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. -M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modelling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.