Characterization of Dynamic Tensile Testing Using Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 at Intermediate Strain Rates

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 137, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 669-679

  Zhu, Deju ^a   Mobasher, Barzin ^a   Rajan, S D ^a   Peralta, Pedro ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aluminum alloy; Fracture surface; Intermediate strain rate; Modal analysis; Strain rate effect

Indexed keywords

DUCTILE FAILURES; DYNAMIC TENSILE TEST; DYNAMIC TENSILE TESTING; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; FAILURE STRAIN; FRACTURE MORPHOLOGY; FRACTURE SURFACE; FRACTURE SURFACES; HIGH-SPEED; HIGH-SPEED TESTING; INTERMEDIATE STRAIN RATE; JOHNSON-COOK; LOADING RATE; ON FLOW; PREDOMINANT FREQUENCY; SERVO-HYDRAULIC MACHINE; SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM; SPRING-MASS-DAMPER; STRAIN RATE EFFECT; STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIORS; TESTING TECHNIQUE; ULTIMATE STRENGTH;

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM ALLOYS; ALUMINUM METALLURGY; DUCTILE FRACTURE; MATERIALS TESTING APPARATUS; MODAL ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRESS ANALYSIS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TENSILE TESTING; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

STRAIN RATE;

ALLOY; ALUMINUM; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FRACTURE; FRACTURE MECHANICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; STRAIN RATE; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TENSILE STRENGTH; VIBRATION;

EID: 80155140393     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000264     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. The fundamentals of modal testing. 1997, Agilent Technologies, Application Note 243-3, Santa Clara, CA.
2. Banerjee B. MPM validation: Sphere-cylinder impact tests: Energy balance. 2004, Rep. No. C-SAFE-CD-IR-04-001, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City.
3. Bastias P.C. Kulkarni S.M. Kim K.Y. Gargas J. Non-contacting strain measurements during tensile tests. Exp. Mech. 1996, 36(1):78-83. EXMCAZ, 0014-4851, 10.1007/BF02328701.
4. Blazynski T.Z. Materials at high strain rates 1987, Elsevier, London.
5. Borsutzki M. Cornette D. Kuriyama Y. Uenishi A. Yan B. Opbroek E. Recommendations for dynamic tensile testing of sheet steels. 2005, and International Iron and Steel Institute, High Strain Rate Experts Group, Brussels, Belgium.
6. 3 metal-matrix composite. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1995, 32(17):2609-2626. IJSOAD, 0020-7683, 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00285-5.
7. Dieter G.E. Mechanical metallurgy 1986, McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Dutton J. Dynamic tensile properties of thin sheet materials. 2005, Research Rep. 303, Health and Safety Executive (HSL), Buxton, U.K.
9. Proposed standard method for dynamic tensile tests. 1997, European Structural Integrity Society (ESIS) Committee, ESIS TC5.
10. Fitoussi J. Meraghni F. Jendli Z. Hug G. Baptiste D. Experimental methodology for high strain rates tensile behavior analysis of polymer matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65(14):2174-2188. CSTCEH, 0266-3538, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.001.
11. Hill S.I. Standardization of high strain rate test techniques for automotive plastics. 2004, UDR-TR-2004-00016, Univ. of Dayton Research Institute (UDRI) Structural Test Group, Dayton, OH.
12. Hill S.I. Sjlom P. Practical considerations in determining high strain rate material properties. 1998, and SAE 981136, Warrendale, PA.
13. Hoge K.G. Influence of strain rate on mechanical properties of 6061-T6 aluminum under uniaxial and biaxial states of stress. Exp. Mech. 1966, 6(4):204-211. EXMCAZ, 0014-4851, 10.1007/BF02326150, .
14. Huh H. Kang W.J. Han S.S. tension split Hopkinson bar for investigating the dynamic behavior of sheet metals. Exp. Mech. 2002, 42:8-17. EXMCAZ, 0014-4851, 10.1007/BF02411046.
15. Jiang C.W. Chen M.M. Dynamic properties of materials, part II: Aluminum alloys. 1974, and Rep. No. AMMRC CTR 74-23, Boston Univ., Boston.
16. Johnson G.R. Cook W.H. constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures. Proc., 7th Int. Symposium on Ballistics 1983, 541-547. and Int. Ballistics Society, The Hague, Netherlands,.
17. Johnson G.R. Cook W.H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperature and pressures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1985, 21(1):31-48. EFMEAH, 0013-7944, 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9.
18. Kenneth G.H. Influence of strain rate on mechanical properties of 6061-T6 aluminum under uniaxial and biaxial states of stress. Exp. Mech. 1966, 6(4):204-211. EXMCAZ, 0014-4851, 10.1007/BF02326150, .
19. Lesuer D.R. Kay G.J. LeBlanc M.M. Modeling large-strain, high-rate deformation in metals. Proc., 3rd Biennial Tri-Laboratory Engineering Conf. Modeling and Simulation 1999, and U.S. DOE, Pleasanton, CA.
20. Lim J.H. High speed tensile test of automotive steel sheets at the intermediate strain rate. 2007, Technical Rep. No. 16, Pohang Iron and Steel Company (POSCO), Pohang, South Korea.
21. Mario P. Structural dynamics: Theory and computation 2004, 59-62. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA,.
22. MATLAB. [Computer software]. Natick, MA, Mathworks.
23. Mechtcherine V. Behaviour of strain-hardening cement-based composites under high strain rates. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2011, 9(1):51-62. JACTBX, 1346-8014, 10.3151/jact.9.51, .
24. Meyers M.A. Dynamic behavior of materials 1994, Wiley, New York.
25. Nicholas T. Tensile testing of material at high rates of strain. Exp. Mech. 1981, 21:177-185. EXMCAZ, 0014-4851, 10.1007/BF02326644, .
26. Laser extensometer 3000 operation and maintenance manual. 1993, OPTRA, Inc., Topsfield, MA.
27. Polla M. Comparison of predictive FIR-based zero-crossing detection methods. Proc., Finnish Signal Processing (FINSIG) Symposium 2003, 87-90. Tampere Univ. of Technology, Tampere, Finland,.
28. Silva F.A. Butler M. Mechtcherine V. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Strain rate effect on the tensile behaviour of textile-reinforced concrete under static and dynamic loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2011, 528(3):1727-1734. MSAPE3, 0921-5093, 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.014.
29. Silva F.A. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Soranakom C. Toledo Filho R.D. High speed tensile behavior of sisal fiber cement composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010, 527(3):544-552. MSAPE3, 0921-5093, 10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.013.
30. Smerd R. Winkler S. Sailsbury C. Worswick M. Lloyd D. Finn M. High strain rate tensile testing of automotive aluminum alloy sheet. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2005, 32:541-560. IJIED4, 0734-743X, 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.013.
31. -1. Mater. Res. Stand. 1963, 3(9):713-718. .
32. Sreidel R.F. Makerov C.E. The tensile properties of some engineering materials at moderate rates of strain. ASTM Bull. 1960, 247:57-64. and .
33. Vainio O. Ovaska S.J. Noise reduction in zero crossing detection by predictive digital filtering. Industries electriques et electroniques 1995, 42(1):58-62. IEEQAG, 0302-2609, 10.1109/41.345846.
34. Xiao X. Dynamic tensile testing of plastic materials. Polym. Test. 2008, 27(2):164-178. POTEDZ, 0142-9418, 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.010, .
35. Xue Y. McDowell D.L. Horstemeyer M.F. Dale M.H. Jordon J.B. Microstructure-based multistage fatigue modeling of aluminum alloy 7075-T651. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2007, 74(17):2810-2823. EFMEAH, 0013-7944, 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.031.
36. Zabotkin K. O'Toole B. Trabia M. Identification of the dynamic properties of metals under moderate strain rates. Proc., 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf. 2003, and Reston, VA.
37. Zhu D. Gencoglu M. Mobasher B. Low velocity impact behavior of AR glass fabric reinforced cement composites in flexure. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31(6):379-387. CCOCEG, 0958-9465, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.011.
38. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Rajan S.D. High strain rate testing of Kevlar 49 fabric. Proc., 11th Int. Congress and Exhibition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2008, 34-35. and (a). Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT,.
39. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Rajan S.D. Image analysis of Kevlar 49 fabric at high strain rate. Proc., 11th Int. Congress and Exhibition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2008, 986-991. and (b). Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT,.
40. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Rajan S.D. Experimental study of dynamic behavior of Kevlar 49 single yarn. Proc., Annual Conf. and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2010, 542-547. and (a). Society for Experimental Mechanics, Indianapolis, IN,.
41. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Rajan S.D. Dynamic tensile testing of Kevlar 49 fabrics. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 23(3):230-239. JMCEE7, 0899-1561, and (a). .
42. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Rajan S.D. Non-contacting strain measurement for cement-based composites in dynamic tensile testing. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, and (b). in press.
43. Zhu D. Mobasher B. Silva F. Peled A. High speed tensile behavior of fabric-cement composites. Proc., Int. Conf. on Material Science and 64th RILEM Annual Week 2010, 205-213. and (b). Aachen, Germany,.
44. Zhu D. Peled A. Mobasher B. High speed imaging in dynamic tensile testing of fabric-cement composites. Proc., Annual Conf. and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics 2010, 2462-2468. and © Society for Experimental Mechanics, Indianapolis, IN,.
45. Zhu D. Peled A. Mobasher B. Dynamic tensile testing of fabric-cement composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25(1):385-395. CBUMEZ, 0950-0618, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.014, and ©
46. Zhu D. Rajan S.D. Mobasher B. Peled A. Mignolet M. Modal analysis of a servo-hydraulic high speed testing machine and its application to dynamic tensile testing at an intermediate strain rate. Exp. Mech. 2011, and (d). in press.