Modal Analysis of a Servo-Hydraulic High Speed Machine and its Application to Dynamic Tensile Testing at an Intermediate Strain Rate

Experimental Mechanics

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1347-1363

  Zhu, D ^a   Rajan, S D ^a   Mobasher, B ^a   Peled, A ^b   Mignolet, M ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Dynamic tensile tests; Engineering materials; Intermediate strain rate; Modal analysis; Predominant frequencies

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC STRESS; DYNAMIC TENSILE BEHAVIOR; DYNAMIC TENSILE TEST; DYNAMIC TENSILE TESTING; ENGINEERING MATERIALS; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; FAILURE BEHAVIORS; GLASS FABRIC; HIGH SPEED MACHINE; HIGH-SPEED DIGITAL CAMERAS; HIGH-SPEED TESTING; INTERMEDIATE STRAIN RATE; LOADING RATE; PREDOMINANT FREQUENCY; QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA; SHPB TEST; SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM; SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BARS; SPRING-MASS-DAMPER;

CAMERAS; HYDRAULIC MACHINERY; MATERIALS; MATERIALS TESTING APPARATUS; MODAL ANALYSIS; STRESS ANALYSIS; TENSILE TESTING; LOADING; STRAIN RATE;

STRAIN RATE; TENSILE TESTING;

EID: 79955600538     PISSN: 00144851     EISSN: 17412765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-010-9443-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Chen W, Zhang B, Forestal MJ (1999) A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique for low-impedance materials. Exp Mech 39: 81-85.
2. Silva F, Zhu D, Mobasher B, Toledo Filho RD (2010) Impact behavior of sisal fiber cement composites under flexural load. ACI Mater J, accepted.
3. Kenneth GH (1966) Influence of strain rate on mechanical properties of 6061. T6 aluminum under uniaxial and biaxial states of stress. Exp Mech 6(4): 204-211.
4. Zabotkin K, O'Toole B, Trabia M (2003) Identification of the dynamic properties of materials under moderate strain rates. 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Seattle, WA.
5. Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc Sect B 62: 676-700.
6. Gray GT (2000) Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing, mechanical testing and evaluation. ASM Handbook 8: 488-496.
7. Chen W, Lu F, Cheng M (2002) Tension and compression tests of two polymers under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Polym Test 21: 113-121.
8. Chocron Benlooulo IS, Rodriguez J, Martinez MA, Sanchez Galvez V (1997) Dynamic tensile testing of aramid and polyethylene fiber composites. Int J Impact Eng 19(2): 135-146.
9. Johnstone C, Ruiz C (1995) Dynamic testing of ceramics under tensile stress. Int J Solids Struct 32: 2647-2656.
10. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2001) A split Hopkinson bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials. Exp Mech 41: 40-46.
11. Xia Y, Wang Y (1999) The effects of strain rate on the mechanical behaviour of Kevlar fibre bundles: an experimental and theoretical study. Compos A 29A: 1411-1415.
12. Cheng M, Chen WN, Weerasooriya T (2005) Mechanical properties of Kevlar KM2 single fiber. J Eng Mater Technol 127: 197-204.
13. Lim JH (2007) High speed tensile test of automotive steel sheets at the intermediate strain rate. POSCO Technical Report 10(1): 116-122.
14. Bastias PC, Kulkarni SM, Kim KY, Gargas J (1996) Non-contacting strain measurements during tensile tests. Exp Mech 36: 78-83.
15. Bruce DM, Matlock DK, Speer JG, De AK (2004) Assessment of the strain-rate dependent tensile properties of automotive sheet steels. Society of Automotive Engineer, Varrendale, PA, SAE paper#2004-01-0507.
16. Xiao XR (2008) Dynamic tensile testing of plastic materials. Polym Test 27: 164-178.
17. Hill S, Sjöblom P (1998) Practical considerations in determining high strain rate material properties. SAE, 981136.
18. Zhu D, Mobasher B, Rajan SD (2008) High strain rate testing of Kevlar 49 fabric. Society for experimental mechanics-11th International Congress and Exhibition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, v1: 34-35.
19. Zhu D, Mobasher B, Rajan SD (2008) Image analysis of Kevlar 49 fabric at high strain rate. Society for experimental mechanics-11th International Congress and Exhibition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, v2: 986-991.
20. Zhu D, Mobasher B, Rajan SD (2010) Dynamic tensile testing of Kevlar 49 fabrics. ASCE J Mater Civ Eng, accepted, http://dx. doi. org/10. 1061/(ASCE)MT. 1943-5533. 0000156.
21. Zhu D, Mobasher B, Rajan SD (2010) Experimental study of dynamic behavior of Kevlar 49 single yarn. Society for experimental mechanics-Annual Conference & Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 7-10, 2010.
22. Fitoussi J, Meraghni F, Jendli Z, Hug G, Baptiste D (2005) Experimental methodology for high strain rates tensile behavior analysis of polymer matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 65: 2174-2188.
23. Zhu D, Peled A, Mobasher B (2011) Dynamic tensile testing of fabric-cement composites. Constr Build Mater 25: 385-395.
24. High Strain Rate Tensile Testing of Polymers, J2749 (2008).
25. Borsutzki M, Cornette D, Kuriyama Y, Uenishi A, Yan B, Opbroek E (2003) Recommended practice for dynamic tensile testing for sheet steels. International Iron and Steel Institute: High Strain Rate Experts Group.
26. Sahraoui S, Lataillade JL (1990) Dynamic effects during instrumented impact testing. Eng Fract Mech 36: 1013-1019.
27. Sahraoui S, Lataillade JL (1998) Analysis of load oscillations in instrumented impact testing. Eng Fract Mech 60: 437-446.
28. Found MS, Howard IC, Paran AP (1998) Interpretation of signals from dropweight impact tests. Compos Struct 42: 353-364.
29. Ahn SJ, Jeong WB, Yoo WS (2004) An estimation of error-free frequency response function from impact hammer testing. JSME Int J C 47: 852-857.
30. Fujii Y (2003) Proposal for a step response evaluation method for force transducers. Meas Sci Technol 14: 1741-1746.
31. Cain PJ (1987) Digital filtering of impact data. In: Kessler SL, Adams GC, Driscoll SB, Ireland DR (eds) Instrumented Impact Testing of Plastics and Composite Materials (ASTM STP 936). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 81-102.
32. Zhu D, Gencoglu M, Mobasher B (2009) Low velocity impact behavior of AR glass fabric reinforced cement composites in flexure. Cement Concr Compos 31: 379-387.
33. The fundamentals of modal testing. Application Note 243-3. Hewlett-Packard Co, USA.
34. Silva F, Zhu D, Mobasher B, Soranakom C, Toledo Filho RD (2009) High speed tensile behavior of sisal fiber cement composites. Mater Sci Eng, A 527: 544-552.
35. Mignolet MP, Red-Horse JR (1994) ARMAX identification of vibrating structures: model and model order estimation.-Proceedings of the 35th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp 1628-1637.
36. Peled A, Mobasher B (2005) Pultruded fabric-cement composites. ACI Mater J 102: 15-23.
37. Peled A, Mobasher B (2006) Properties of fabric-cement composites made by pultrusion. Mater Struct 39: 787-797.
38. Zhu D (2009) Experimental study and finite element modeling of woven fabrics. Ph. D. Dissertation, Arizona State University.
39. Gray GT (2000) Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing. Mechanical testing and evaluation handbook, vol. 8. American Society for Metals, Materials Park, pp 488-496.
40. Foreman J (1990) Sound analysis and noise control. van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.