Process zone in the Single Cantilever Beam under transverse loading - Part II: Experimental

Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-21

  Budzik, M K ^a,b   Jumel, J ^a   Shanahan, M E R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Adhesive joints; Cohesive zone; Crack propagation; Fracture; Mixed mode test

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE JOINTS; CANTILEVER BEAMS; CRACK PROPAGATION; CRACKS; FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES; FRACTURE; NANOCANTILEVERS; STRAIN; STRAIN GAGES;

ADHESIVELY BONDED JOINTS; COHESIVE ZONES; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION TECHNIQUE; EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENT; MIXED MODE TESTS; PASTERNAK ELASTIC FOUNDATIONS; STRESS REDISTRIBUTION;

STRESS ANALYSIS;

EID: 80055111264     PISSN: 01678442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. Avram, Fatigue Response of the Thin Stiffened Aluminium Cracked Panels Repaired with Bonded Composite Patches, Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Ohio, USA, 2001.
2. H.R. Crooks, Reduction of Thermal Residual Strains in Adhesively Bonded Composite Repairs, Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Ohio, USA, 2003.
3. Ripling E.J., Mostovoy S., Patrick R.L. Measuring fracture toughness of adhesive joints. Mater. Res. Stand. (ASTM Bull.) 1964, 4:129-134.
4. Berry J.P. Determination of fracture surface energies by the cleavage technique. J. Appl. Phys. 1963, 34(1):62-68.
5. Williams J.G. End corrections for orthotropic DCB specimens. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1989, 35(4):367-376.
6. Williams J.G. Root rotation and plastic work effects in the peel test. J. Adhes. 1993, 41:225-239.
7. Budzik M.K., Jumel J., Shanahan M.E.R. Adhesive compliance effect in mode I separation: profilometry approach. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2011, 31:135-145.
8. Dugdale D. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1960, 8:100-104.
9. Hutchinson J. Plastic stress and strain fields at a crack tip. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1968, 16:337-347.
10. Crocombe A.D. Global yielding as a failure criterion for bonded joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1989, 9(3):126.
11. Sheppard A., Kelly D., Tong L. A damage zone model for the failure analysis of adhesively bonded joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1998, 18:385-400.
12. Zhang Z.H., Shang J.K., Lawrence F.V. A backface strain technique for detecting fatigue crack initiation in adhesive joints. J. Adhes. 1995, 49:23-36.
13. Crocombe A.D., Ong C.Y., Chan C.M., Abdel Wahab M.M., Ashcroft I.A. Investigating fatigue damage evolution in adhesively bonded structures using backface strain measurement. J. Adhes. 2002, 78(9):745-776.
14. Budzik M.K., Jumel J., Imielinska K., Shanahan M.E.R. Accurate and continuous adhesive fracture energy determination using an instrumented wedge test. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009, 29:694-701.
15. Budzik M.K., Jumel J., Imielinska K., Shanahan M.E.R. Fracture in composite/aluminium joints of variable adhesive properties. J. Adhes. 2009, 85:736-754.
16. Jones R., Molent L., Pitt S. Understanding crack growth in fuselage lap joints. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2008, 49:38-50.
17. Papanikos P., Tserpes K.I., Labeas G., Pantelakis Sp. Progressive damage modelling of bonded composite repairs. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2005, 43:189-198.
18. M.K. Budzik, J. Jumel, M.E.R. Shanahan, Formation and growth of the crack in bonded joints under mode I fracture: substrate deflection at crack vicinity, J. Adhes., in press.
19. Szekrényes A., Uj J. Comparison of some improved solutions for mixed-mode composite delamination coupons. Compos. Struct. 2006, 72(3):321-329.
20. Chauffaille S., Jumel J., Shanahan M.E.R. Pre-cracking behaviour in the single cantilever beam adhesion test. Int. J. Fract. 2011, 169:133-144.
21. Kanninen M.F. A dynamic analysis of unstable crack propagation and arrest in the DCB test specimen. Int. J. Fract. 1974, 10(3):415-430.
22. Budzik M.K., Jumel J., Imielinska K., Shanahan M.E.R. Effect of adhesive compliance in the assessment of soft adhesives with the wedge test. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25:131-149.
23. Timoshenko S., Goodier J.N. Theory of Elasticity 1951, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
24. http://www.matweb.com.
25. Sutton M.A., Wolters W.J., Peters W.H., Ranson W.F., McNeil S.R. Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image Vis. Comput. 1983, 1(3):133-139.
26. Besnard G., Hild F., Roux S. Finite-element displacement fields analysis from digital images: application to Portevin-Le Châtelier bands. Exp. Mech. 2006, 46:789-803.
27. Parry T.V., Wronski A.S. A technique for the measurement of adhesive fracture energy by the blister method. J. Adhes. 1992, 37(4):251-260.
28. Rethore J., Gravouil A., Morestin F., Combescure A. Estimation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using digital image correlation and an interaction integral. Int. J. Fract. 2005, 132:65-79.
29. Fuchs P.F., Major Z. Experimental determination of cohesive zone models for epoxy composites. Exp. Mech. 2011, 51:779-786.