Differences in sensitivity of native and exotic fish species to changes in river temperature

Current Zoology

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 852-862

  Leuven, R S E W ^a   Hendriks, A J ^a   Huijbregts, M A J ^a   Lenders, H J R ^a   Matthews, J ^a   van der Velde, G ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aquatic invaders; Global warming; Heat discharges; Lethal temperature; River Rhine; Thermal heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055104751     PISSN: 16745507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/57.6.852     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aarts BGW, Nienhuis PH, 2003. Fish zonation and guilds as the basis for assessment of ecological integrity of large rivers. Hydrobiologia 500: 157-178.
2. Aarts BGW, Van den Brink FWB, Nienhuis PH, 2004. Habitat loss as the main cause of the slow recovery of fish fauna of regulated large rivers in Europe: The transversal floodplain gradient. River Research and Applications 20: 3-23.
3. Admiraal W, Van der Velde G, Smit H, Cazemier WG, 1993. The rivers Rhine and Meuse in The Netherlands: Present state and signs of ecological recovery. Hydrobiologia 265: 97-128.
4. Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS, Traas TP, 2002. Normal species sensitivity distributions and probabilistic ecological risk assessment. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP ed. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 133-154.
5. Bense VF, Kooi H, 2004. Temporal and spatial variations of shallow subsurface temperature as a record of lateral variations in groundwater flow. Journal of Geophysical Research 109: B04103.
6. Bij de Vaate A, Breukel R, Van der Velde G, 2006. Long-term developments in ecological rehabilitation of the main distributaries in the Rhine delta: Fish and macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 565: 243-257.
7. Blanchet S, Grenouillet G, Beauchard O, Tedesco PA, Leprieur F. *et al., 2010. Non-native species disrupt the worldwide patterns of freshwater fish body size: Implications for Bergmann's rule. Ecology Letters 13: 421-431.
8. Boderie P, Meijers E, Peñailillo R, 2006. Verificatie SOBEK-Landelijk temperatuurmodel (Verification of SOBEK-a national temperature model). Rapport Q4166. Delft: WL, Delft Hydraulics (in Dutch).
9. Bomford M, Barry SC, Lawrence E, 2010. Predicting establishment success for introduced freshwater fishes: A role for climate matching. Biological Invasions 12: 2559-2571.
10. De Groot SJ, 2002. A review of the past and present status of anadromous fish species in the Netherlands: Is restocking the Rhine feasible? Hydrobiologia 478: 205-218.
11. De Leeuw JJ, Buijse AD, Haidvogl G, Lapinska M, Noble R. *et al., 2007. Challenges in developing fish-based ecological assessment methods for large floodplain rivers. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14: 483-494.
12. De Vries P, Tamis JE, Murk AJ, Smit MGD, 2009. Development and application of a species sensitivity distribution for temperature-induced mortality in the aquatic environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27: 2591-2598.
13. De Zwart D, Posthuma L, 2005. Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: Proposed methodologies. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24: 2665-2676.
14. Dorenbosch M, van Kessel N, Kranenbarg J, Spikmans F, Verberk W. *et al., 2011. Nevengeulen in uiterwaarden als kraamkamer voor riviervissen (Side channels in floodplains as nurseries for river fish). Report Ontwikkeling en Beheer Natuurkwaliteit 2011/OBN143-RI. Driebergen: Bosschap, Bedrijfschap voor Bos en Natuur (in Dutch).
15. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, 2011. Monitoring programme for status assessment of National Water Systems (MWTL-DONAR). Lelystad, Rijkswaterstaat (http://www.waterbase.nl/; Last accessed April 4, 2011).
16. European Council, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327: 1-72.
17. FishBase Consortium, 2007. A Global Information System on Fishes. (www.fishbase.org; Last accessed 1 November 2007).
18. Fredrich F, 2003. Long-term investigations of migratory behaviour of asp (Aspius aspius L.) in the middle part of the Elbe River, Germany. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 19: 294-302.
19. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS, 2008. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology 22: 534-543.
20. Hokanson KEF, 1977. Temperature requirements of some percids and adaptations to seasonal temperature cycle. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34: 1524-1550.
21. Kley A, Maier G, 2006. Reproductive characteristics of invasive gammarids in the Rhine-Main-Danube catchment, South Germany. Limnologica 36: 79-90.
22. Kooi H, 2008. Spatial variability in subsurface warming over the last three decades: Insight from repeated borehole temperature measurements in The Netherlands. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 270: 86-94.
23. Kottelat M, Freyhof J, 2007. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Cornol, Switzerland, Kottelat and Berlin, Germany: Freyhof.
24. Ligtvoet W, Beugelink G, Van den Berg R, Braat L, Cleij P. *et al, 2006. Welke ruimte biedt de Kaderrichtlijn Water? Een quick scan (Which policy space offers the European Water Framework Directive? A quick scan). Bilthoven: Milieu en Natuur Planbureau (in Dutch).
25. Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S, 2008. Fish invasions in the world's river systems: When natural processes are blurred by human activities. PLoS Biology 6: 404-410.
26. Leuven RSEW, Van der Velde G, Baijens I, Snijders J, Van der Zwart C. *et al., 2009. The River Rhine: A global highway for dispersal of aquatic invasive species. Biological Invasions 11: 1989-2008.
27. Luczynski M, 1991. Temperature requirements for growth and survival of larval vendace Coregonus albula (L). Journal of Fish Biology 38: 29-35.
28. Milner AM, Brown LE, Hannah DM, 2009. Hydroecological response of river systems to shrinking glaciers. Hydrological Processes 23: 62-77.
29. Nienhuis PH, Buijse AD, Leuven RSEW, Smits AJM, De Nooij RJW. *et al., 2002. Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the River Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478: 53-72.
30. Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP, 2002. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
31. Posthuma L, De Zwart, D, 2006. Predicted effects of toxicant mixtures are confirmed by changes in fish species assemblages in Ohio, USA, rivers. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 25: 1094-1105.
32. Raat AJP, 2001. Ecological rehabilitation of the Dutch part of the River Rhine with special attention to the fish. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 17: 131-144.
33. Rahel FJ, Olden, JD, 2008. Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conservation Biology 22: 521-533.
34. Smit MGD, Holthaus KIE, Trannum HC, Neff JM, Kjeilen-Eilertsen G. *et al., 2008. Species sensitivity distributions for suspended clays, sediment burial, and grain size change in the marine environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27: 1006-1012.
35. Struijs J, De Zwart D, Posthuma L, Leuven RSEW, Huijbregts MAJ, 2011. Field sensitivity distribution of macroinvertebrates for phosphorus in inland waters. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 7: 280-286.
36. Uehlinger U, Wantzen KM, Leuven RSEW, Arndt H, 2009. The Rhine River Basin. In: Tockner K, Robinson CT, Uehlinger U ed. Rivers of Europe. Oxford: Elsevier / Academic Press, 199-245.
37. Van den Brink FWB, Van der Velde G, Cazemier WG, 1990. The faunistic composition of the freshwater section of the river Rhine in The Netherlands: Present state and changes since 1900. In: Kinzelbach R, Friedrich G ed. Die Biologie des Rheins. Limnologie aktuell 1: 191-216.
38. Van der Velde G, Nagelkerken I, Rajagopal S, Bij de Vaate A, 2002. Invasions by alien species in inland freshwater bodies in Western Europe: The Rhine delta. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S ed. Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe: Distribution, Impacts and Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 360-372.
39. Van Emmerik WAM, De Nie HW, 2006. De zoetwatervissen van Nederland ecologisch bekeken. Bilthoven: Sportvisserij Nederland (in Dutch).
40. Van Kessel N, Dorenbosch M, De Boer MRM, Leuven RSEW, Van der Velde G, 2011. Competition for shelter between four non-native gobiid and two native small benthic fish species. Current Zoology 57 (6):-.
41. Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ, Van Jaarsveld HA, Reinouds GJ, De Zwart D. *et al., 2007. Time horizon dependent characterization factors for acidification in life-cycle assessment based on forest plant species occurrence in Europe. Environmental Science and Technology 41: 922-927.
42. Ward JV, Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Malard F, 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers Research & Management 17: 311-323.
43. Walther G, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pysěk P. *et al., 2009. Alien species in a warmer world: Risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 686-693.
44. Webb BC, Hannah DM, Moore DR, Brown LE, Nobilis F, 2008. Recent advances in stream and river temperature research. Hydrological Processes 22: 902-918.
45. Xenopoulos MA, Lodge DM, Alcamo J, Marker M, Schulze K. *et al., 2005. Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal. Global Change Biology 11: 1557-1564.