Fish zonations and guilds as the basis for assessment of ecological integrity of large rivers

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 500, Issue , 2003, Pages 157-178

  Aarts, Bram G W ^a   Nienhuis, Piet H ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecological integrity; Fish guilds; Large rivers; Longitudinal zonation; Red Lists

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; MARINE BIOLOGY; RIVERS;

EURYTOPIC SPECIES; FISH ZONATION;

FISHERIES;

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOLOGICAL ZONATION; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; GUILD STRUCTURE; ICHTHYOFAUNA; INDEX METHOD; LONGITUDINAL GRADIENT; RIVER;

DOUBS RIVER; EURASIA; EUROPE; MEUSE RIVER; RHINE RIVER; WESTERN EUROPE;

ICHTHYOFAUNA;

EID: 0344899977     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024638726162     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aarts, B. G. W. & P. H. Nienhuis, 1999. Ecological sustainability and biodiversity. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 6: 89-102.
2. Aarts, B. G. W., F. W. B. van den Brink & P. H. Nienhuis (in press). Habitat loss as the main cause of the stagnating recovery of the fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient. River Res. Appl.
3. Admiraal, W., G. van der Velde, H. Smit & W. G. Cazemier, 1993. The rivers Rhine and Meuse in The Netherlands: present state and signs of ecological recovery. Hydrobiologia 265: 97-128.
4. Allan, J. D., 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Water. Chapman & Hall, New York.
5. Bain, M. B., J. T. Finn & H. E. Booke, 1988. Streamflow regulation and fish community structure. Ecology 69: 382-392.
6. Balon, E. K., 1975a. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 821-864.
7. Balon, E. K., 1975b. Ecological guilds of fishes: a short summary of the concept and its application. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 19: 2430-2439.
8. Balon, E. K., 1981. Additions and amendments to the classification of reproductive styles in fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 6: 377-389.
9. Bayley, P. B. & H. W. Li, 1992. Riverine fishes. In Calow, P. & G. E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook: Hydrological and Ecological Principles. Vol. 1. Blackwell, Oxford: 251-281.
10. Bergers, P. J. M., 1991. Voedselecologie van vissen in de Nederlandse Rijntakken. Publications and Reports of the Project Ecological Rehabilitation of the River Rhine 28: 1-119 (in Dutch, summary in English).
11. Berrebi dit Thomas, R., J. Belliard & P. Boët, 1998. Caractéristiques des peuplements piscicoles sensibles aux altérations du milieu dans les cours d'eau du bassin de la Seine. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 348: 47-64.
12. Buijse, A. D., H. Coops, M. Staras, L. H. Jans, G. J. van Geest, R. E. Grift, B. W. Ibelings, W. Oosterberg & F. C. J. M. Roozen, 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwat. Biol. 47: 889-907.
13. Chovanec, A., P. Jäger, M. Jungwirth, V. Koller-Kreimel, O. Moog, S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 2000. The Austrian way of assessing the ecological integrity of running waters: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 445-452.
14. Copp, G. H., 1989. The habitat diversity and fish reproductive function of floodplain ecosystems. Environ. Biol. Fish. 26: 1-27.
15. Copp, G. H., J.-M. Olivier, M. Peňáz & A. L. Roux, 1991. Juvenile fishes as functional describers of fluvial ecosystem dynamics: applications on the River Rhône, France. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 6: 135-145.
16. De Groot, S. J., 2002. A review of the past and present status of anadromous fish species in the Netherlands: is restocking the Rhine feasible? Hydrobiologia 478/Developments in Hydrobiology 166: 205-218.
17. De Nie, H. W., 1996. Atlas van de Nederlandse Zoetwatervissen. Media Publishing, Doetinchem (in Dutch).
18. De Nie, H. W., 1997. Bedreigde en Kwetsbare Zoetwatervissen in Nederland, Voorstel voor een Rode Lijst. Stichting Atlas Verspreiding Nederlandse Zoetwatervissen, Nieuwegein (in Dutch, summary in English).
19. De Nie, H. W., 1998. Beoordeling van de waterkwaliteit met vissen. In Anonymous (ed.), Cursus Waterkwaliteit. RUG Afdeling Biologie, Groningen: 132-150 (in Dutch)
20. De Nie, H. W. & G. Van Ommering, 1998. Bedreigde en Kwetsbare Zoetwatervissen in Nederland, Toelichting op de Rode Lijst. Informatie-en KennisCentrum Natuurbeheer, Wageningen (in Dutch, summary in English).
21. Dynesius, M. & C. Nilsson, 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753-762.
22. EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 327, 22/12/2000 P 0001. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/main/2000/en_2000L006 0_index.html (4 March 2003)
23. EC-DG XI, 2003. The EU Water Framework Directive - integrated river basin management for Europe. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ environment/water/water- framework/index_en.html (4 March 2003).
24. Goldstein, R. M. & T. P. Simon, 1999. Toward a united definition of guild structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. In Simon, T. P. (ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton: 123-202.
25. Grandmottet, J. P., 1983. Principales exigences des télé ostéens vis-à-vis de l'habitat aquatique. Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, Biologie Animale, 4ème série, fasc. 4: 3-32.
26. Grift, R. E., 2001. How Fish Benefit from Floodplain Restoration along the Lower River Rhine. PhD Thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen.
27. Grift, R. E., A. D. Buijse, W. L. T. van Densen & J. G. P. Klein Breteler, 2000. Restoration of the river-floodplain interaction: benefits for the fish community in the River Rhine. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 135, Large Rivers 12: 1-13.
28. Hawkes, H. A., 1975. River zonation and classification. In Whitton, B. A. (ed.), River Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford: 312-374.
29. Hengeveld, R., 1996. Measuring ecological diversity. Biodivers. Lett. 3: 58-65.
30. Holčík, J. (ed.), 1989. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 1, Part II. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
31. Horwitz, R. J., 1978. Temporal variability patterns and the distributional patterns of stream fishes. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 307-321.
32. Huet, M., 1949. Aperçu des relations entre la pente et les populations piscicoles des eaux courantes. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 11: 333-351.
33. Huet, M., 1959. Profiles and biology of Western European streams as related to fish management. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 88: 155-163.
34. Huet, M., 1962. Influence du courant sur la distribution des poissons dans les eaux courantes. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 24: 413-432.
35. Illies, J. & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 12: 1-57.
36. Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish fauna of an epipotamal river. Hydrobiologia 303: 195-206.
37. Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27.
38. Karr, J. R., 1995. Using biological criteria to protect ecological health. In Rapport, D. J., C. L. Gaudet & P. Calow (eds), Evaluating and Monitoring the Health of Large-Scale Ecosystems. NATO ASI Series, Vol. I 28. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 137-152.
39. Keith, P., 1994. Poissons. In Maurin, H. (ed.), Inventaire de la Faune Menacée en France. Le Livre Rouge. Editions Nathan/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle/WWF-France, Paris: 100-119.
40. Kirchhofer, A. & D. Heftì (eds), 1996. Conservation of Endangered Freshwater Fish in Europe. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
41. Lelek, A., 1987. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 9: Threatened Fishes of Europe. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
42. Lelek, A., 1991. The predator-prey relationship in the fish community of the River Rhine. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 24: 2455-2460.
43. Lelek, A. & G. Buhse, 1992. Fische des Rheins: Früher und Heute. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
44. Lelek, A. & C. Köhler, 1989. Zustandanalyse der Fischartengemeinschaften im Rhein (1987-1988). Fischökologie 1: 47-64.
45. Lenders, H. J. R., B. G. W. Aarts, H. Strijbosch & G. van der Velde, 1998. The role of reference and target images in ecological recovery of river systems: lines of thought in the Netherlands. In Nienhuis P. H., R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. M. J. Ragas (eds), New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Basins. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 35-52.
46. Lenders, H. J. R., M. A. J. Huijbregts, B. G. W. Aarts & C. A. M. van Turnhout, 1999. Assessing the degree of preservation of landscape, natural and cultural-historical values in river dike reinforcement planning in The Netherlands. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 15: 325-337.
47. Leuven, R. S. E. W., Y. Gerig, I. Poudevigne, G. W. Geerling, L. K. Kooistra & B. G. W. Aarts, 2002. Cumulative impact assessment of ecological rehabilitation and infrastructure facilities in floodplains along the middle reach of the River Waal. In Leuven, R. S. E. W., I. Poudevigne & R. M. Teeuw (eds), Application of Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing in River Studies. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 201-216.
48. Lorenz C. M., G. M. van Dijk, A. G. M. van Hattum, W. P. Cofino, 1997. Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 13: 501-516.
49. Morin, R. & R. J. Naiman, 1990. The relation of stream order to fish community dynamics in boreal forest watersheds. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 37: 135-150.
50. Nienhuis P. H., A. D. Buijse, R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. J. M. Smits, R. J. W. De Nooij, E. M. Samborska, 2002. Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478/Developments in Hydrobiology 166: 53-72.
51. Nienhuis, P. H. & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2001. River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism? Hydrobiologia 444: 85-99.
52. Oberdorff, T. & R. M. Hughes, 1992. Modification of an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France. Hydrobiologia 228: 117-130.
53. Peňáz, M. & P. Jurajda, 1993. Fish assemblages of the Morava River - Longitudinal zonation and protection. Folia Zool. 42: 317-328.
54. Quak, J., 1994. De visstand in stromende wateren. In Raat, A. J. P. (ed.), Vismigratie, Visgeleiding en Vispassages in Nederland. Organisation for the Improvement of Inland Fisheries, Nieuwegein: 59-84 (in Dutch).
55. Raat A. J. P., 2001. Ecological rehabilitation of the Dutch part of the River Rhine with special attention to the fish. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 17: 131-144.
56. Redeke, H. C., 1941. Fauna van Nederland X (Pisces). Sijthoff's, Leiden (in Dutch).
57. Schiemer, F., 1988. Gefärdete Cypriniden - Indikatoren für die ökologische Intaktheit von Flußsystemen. Natur und Landschaft 63: 370-373.
58. Schiemer, F. & T. Spindler, 1989. Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 4: 397-407.
59. Schiemer, F. & H. Waidbacher, 1992. Strategies for conservation of a Danubian fish fauna. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. Wiley, Chichester: 363-382.
60. Schmutz, S., B. Kaufmann, B. Vogel, M. Jungwirth & S. Muhar, 2000. A multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 279-289.
61. Schöll, F. & A. Haybach, 2000. Der Potamon-Typie-Index -ein indikatives Verfahren zur ökologischen Bewertung großer Fließgewässer. Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung 44: 32-33.
62. Schouten, W. J. & J. Quak, 1994. De Visstand in de Stromende Rijkswateren. RIZA/OVB VO 1993-01. Organisation for the Improvement of Inland Fisheries, Nieuwegein/Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment, Lelystad (in Dutch).
63. Siepel, H., R. J. Knijn, F. J. J. Niewold & H. J. L Heessen, 1993. De Internationale Betekenis van Nederland voor de Fauna; 2. De Aquatische Fauna. IBN-DLO, Wageningen (in Dutch).
64. Simberloff, D. & T. Dayan, 1991. The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 115-143.
65. Simon, T. P. (ed), 1999. Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
66. Tittizer, T. & F. Krebs (eds), 1996. Ökosystemforschung: Der Rhein und seine Auen - Eine Bilanz. Springer, Berlin.
67. Van den Brink, F. W. B., 1994. Impact of Hydrology on Floodplain Lake Ecosystems along the Lower Rhine and Meuse. PhD Thesis. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
68. Van den Brink, F. W. B., G. van der Velde, A. D. Buijse & A. G. Klink, 1996. Biodiversity in the Lower Rhine and Meuse river-floodplains: its significance for ecological management. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 30: 129-149.
69. Van der Velde, G. & F. W. B. van den Brink, 1994. Does the Rhine still have characteristics of a river ecosystem? The longitudinal distribution of macroinvertebrates. Water Sci. Technol. 29: 1-8.
70. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130-137.
71. Verneaux, J., 1973. Cours d'Eau de Franche-Comté (Massif du Jura). Recherches Écologiques sur le Réseau Hydrographique du Doubs. Essai de Biotypologie. Thesis, University of Besançon.
72. Verneaux, J., 1981. Les poissons et la qualité des cours d'eau. Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, Biologie Animale, 4ème série, fasc. 2: 33-41.
73. Verneaux, J., A. Schmitt, V. Verneaux & C. Prouteau, 2003. Benthic insects and fish of the Doubs River system: typological traits and the development of a species continuum in a theoretically extrapolated watercourse. Hydrobiologia 490: 63-74.
74. Volz, J. & W. G. Cazemier, 1991. Die Fischfauna im niederländischen Rhein - eine aktuelle Bestandsaufname. Fischökologie 5: 3-18.
75. Vriese, F. T., S. Semmekrot & A. J. P. Raat, 1994. Assessment of spawning and nursery areas in the river Meuse. Water Sci. Technol. 29: 297-299.