A Margin Sharpness Measurement for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1577-1581

  Levman, Jacob E D ^a   Martel, Anne L ^a  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis; Margin; MRI

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80055103375     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ford D., Easton D.F., Stratton M., et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 62:676-689.
2. Curry S.J. Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection 2003, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
3. Warner E., Plewes D.P., Hill K.A., et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004, 292:1317-1325.
4. Lehman C., Gatsonis C., Kuhl C.K., et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:1295-1303.
5. Pediconi F., Catalano C., Roselli A., et al. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Radiology 2007, 243:670-680.
6. Lee S.G., Orel S.G., Woo I.J., et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003, 226:773-778.
7. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. Cancer J Clin 2007, 57:75-89. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group.
8. Warren R., Hayes C., Pointon L., et al. A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study. Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24:917-929.
9. Gilhuijs K., Giger M.L., Bick U. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys 1998, 25:1647-1654.
10. Gilhuijs K., Giger M.L., Bick U. Automated feature extraction and classification of breast lesions in magnetic resonance images. Proc SPIE 1998, 3338:294-300.
11. Penn A., Thompson S., Brem R., et al. Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol 2006, 13:1344-1354.
12. Greenman R.L., Lenkinski R.E., Schnall M.D., et al. Bilateral imaging using separate interleaved 3D volumes and dynamically switched multiple receive coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1998, 39:108-115.
13. Martel A.L., Froh M.S., Brock K.K., et al. Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52:3803-3816.
14. Levman J., Causer P., Warner E., et al. Effect of the enhancement threshold on the computer-aided detection of breast cancer using MRI. Acad Radiol 2009, 16:1064-1069.
15. Eng J. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a primer. Acad Radiol 2005, 12:909-916.
16. Levman J., Leung T., Causer P., et al. Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27:688-696.