On the limitations of graph-theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation

Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1543-1547

  Moilanen, Atte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Conservation planning; Dispersal; Fragmentation; Habitat quality; Isolation; Metapopulation; Species distribution modeling; Threshold

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055097990     PISSN: 00218901     EISSN: 13652664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02062.x     Document Type: Note

References (38)

1. Bodin, O. & Saura, S. (2010) Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2393-2405.
2. Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L. & Keitt, T.H. (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 265-278.
3. Calabrese, J.M. & Fagan, W.F. (2004) A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 529-536.
4. Chetkiewicz, C.L.B., Clair, C.C.S. & Boyce, M.S. (2006) Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 37, 317-342.
5. Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M. (2006) Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Drielsma, M. & Ferrier, S. (2009) Rapid evaluation of metapopulation persistence in highly variegated landscapes. Biological Conservation, 142, 529-540.
7. Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40, 677-697.
8. Estrada, E. & Bodin, O. (2008) Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecological Applications, 18, 1810-1825.
9. Hanski, I. (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 151-162.
10. Hanski, I. (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature, 396, 41-49.
11. Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature, 404, 755-758.
12. Heller, N.E. & Zavaleta, E.S. (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22years of recommendations. Biological Conservation, 142, 14-32.
13. Hodgson, J., Thomas, C.D., Wintle, B.A. & Moilanen, A. (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making - back to basics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 964-969.
14. Hodgson, J., Moilanen, A., Wintle, B.A. & Thomas, C.D. (2011) Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 148-152.
15. Kindlmann, P. & Burel, F. (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecology, 23, 879-890.
16. Leathwick, J.R., Moilanen, A., Ferrier, S. & Julian, K. (2010) Community-based conservation prioritization using a community classification, and its application to riverine ecosystems. Biological Conservation, 143, 984-991.
17. Lehtomäki, J., Tomppo, E., Kuokkanen, P., Hanski, I. & Moilanen, A. (2009) Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 2439-2449.
18. Margules, C.R. & Sarkar, S. (2007) Systematic Conservation Planning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. May, R.M. (2005) Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 345-353.
20. McRae, B.H., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T.H. & Shah, V.B. (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89, 2712-2724.
21. Minor, E.S. & Urban, D.L. (2008) A graph-theory frarmework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 22, 297-307.
22. Moilanen, A. (2005) Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. The American Naturalist, 165, 695-706.
23. Moilanen, A. & Nieminen, M. (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology, 83, 1131-1145.
24. Moilanen, A. & Wintle, B.A. (2007) The boundary quality penalty: a quantitative method for approximating species responses to fragmentation in reserve selection. Conservation Biology, 21, 355-364.
25. Newman, M.E.J. (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167-256.
26. Ovaskainen, O., Rekola, H., Meyke, E. & Arjas, E. (2008) Bayesian methods for analyzing movements in heterogeneous landscapes from mark-recapture data. Ecology, 89, 542-554.
27. Palmer, S.C.F., Coulon, A. & Travis, J.M.J. (2011) Introducing a 'stochastic movement simulator' for estimating habitat connectivity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 258-268.
28. Pascual-Hortal, L. & Saura, S. (2006) Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the prioritization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology, 21, 959-967.
29. Proulx, S.R., Promislow, D.E.L. & Phillips, P.C. (2005) Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 345-353.
30. Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.J. & Fall, A. (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecology, 25, 519-532.
31. Rayfield, B., Moilanen, A. & Fortin, M.-J. (2009) Incorporating consumer-resource spatial interactions in reserve design. Ecological Modelling, 220, 725-733.
32. Saura, S. & Pascual-Hortal, L. (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 91-103.
33. Travis, J.M. & Dytham, C. (1999) Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 266, 723-728.
34. Urban, D.L. (2005) Modeling ecological processes across scales. Ecology, 86, 1996-2006.
35. Urban, D.L. & Keitt, T. (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82, 1205-1218.
36. Urban, D.L., Minor, E.S., Treml, E.A. & Schick, R.S. (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecology Letters, 12, 260-273.
37. Watts, K. & Handley, P. (2010) Developing a functional connectivity indicator to detect change in fragmented landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 10, 552-557.
38. Zetterberg, A., Mörtberg, U.M. & Balfors, B. (2010) Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 181-191.