A review of city portals: The transformation of service provision under the democratization of the fourth phase

Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 215-224

  Deakin, Mark ^a  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055090823     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-933-0.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Davison, R., Wagner, C., & Ma, L. (2005). From government to e-government: a transition model. Information Technology & People, 18(3), 280-299. doi:10.1108/09593840510615888
2. Deakin, M. (2009). The IntelCities Community of Practice: the eGov services model for sociallyinclusive and participatory urban regeneration programmes. In Riddeck, C. (Ed.), Research Strategies for eGovernment Service Adoption. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
3. Deakin, M., & Allwinkle, S. (2006). The IntelCities community of practice: the e-learning platform, knowledge management system and digital library for semantically-interoperable e-governance services. International Journal of Knowledge. Culture and Change Management, 6(3), 155-162.
4. Deakin, M., & Allwinkle, S. (2007). Urban regeneration and sustainable communities: the role of networks, innovation and creativity in building successful partnerships. Journal of Urban Technology, 14(1), 77-91. doi:10.1080/10630730701260118
5. Deakin, M., Allwinkle, S., & Campbell, F. (2006). The IntelCities e-Learning platform, knowledge management system and digital library for semantically rich e-governance services. International Journal of Technology. Knowledge and Society, 2(8), 31-38.
6. Deakin, M., Allwinkle, S., & Campbell, F. (2007). The IntelCities Community of Practice: the eGov Services for Socially-inclusive and Participatory Urban Regeneration Programmes. In Cunningham, P. (Ed.), Innovation and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications and Case Studies. Washington, DC: ISO Press.
7. Haung, Z. (2005). A comprehensive analysis of U.S. counties' e-Government portals: development status and functionalities. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 149-164. doi:10.1057/ palgrave.ejis.3000675
8. Hernández, M. G. (2007). Latin America Online: Cases, Successes and Pitfalls. Hershey, PA: IRM Press.
9. Kaaya, J. (2005). Implementing e-Government Services in East Africa: Assessing Status through Content Analysis of Government Websites, Electronic. Journal of E-Government, 2, 139-154.
10. Lombardi, P., Cooper, I., Paskaleva, K., & Deakin, M. (2009). The challenge of designing user-centric e-services: European dimensions. In Reddick, C. G. (Ed.), Research Strategies for eGovernment Service Adoption. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
11. Ma, L., Chung, J., & Thorson, S. (2005). E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 20-37. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2004.10.001
12. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2005). Egovernment developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 217-238. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2005.02.004
13. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Ryo, S. (2005). E-government and the transformation of public services in EU countries. Online Information Review, 29(5), 531-553. doi:10.1108/14684520510628918
14. Werrakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2009). From eGovernment to TGovernment. In Riddeck, C. (Ed.), Research Strategies for eGovernment Service Adoption. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.