Prenatal diagnosis on chorionic villi using molecular techniques should be performed from mesenchymal core rather than from direct villi

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1111-1112

  Toutain, Jérôme ^a,b   Soler, Gwendoline ^a   Horovitz, Jacques ^a,b   Saura, Robert ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHORION VILLUS; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; CYTOTROPHOBLAST; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MULTIPLEX LIGATION DEPENDENT PROBE AMPLIFICATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHORIONIC VILLI; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 18; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; TRISOMY;

EID: 80055088579     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2776     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Filges I, Kang A, Klug V, et al. 2011. aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 31: 473-478.
2. Kooper AJ, Faas BH, Feuth T, et al. 2009. Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. J Mol Diagn 11: 17-24.
3. Lau ET, Tang L, Wong C, et al. 2009. Assessing discrepant findings between QF-PCR on uncultured prenatal samples and karyotyping on long-term culture. Prenat Diagn 29: 151-155.
4. Saura R, Toutain J, Horovitz J. 2010a. A freehand ultrasonographically guided technique in transabdominal chorionic villus sampling in more than 24 000 consecutive cases. Prenat Diagn 30: 387-388.
5. Saura R, Toutain J, Paris A, Deplagne C, Horovitz J. 2010b. Prenatal molecular cytogenetic analysis should be performed on mesenchymal core rather than on cytotrophoblast cells. Prenat Diagn 30(Suppl 1): S23.
6. Toutain J, Rota C, Begorre M, Vandenbossche F, Horovitz J, Saura R. 2008. Value of FISH in prenatal first-term diagnosis: a new approach?. Prenat Diagn 28(Suppl 1): S49.
7. Toutain J, Epiney M, Begorre M, et al. 2010a. First-trimester prenatal diagnosis performed on pregnant women with fetal ultrasound abnormalities: the reliability of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on mesenchymal core for the main aneuploidies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 149: 143-146.
8. Toutain J, Labeau-Gaüzere C, Barnetche T, et al. 2010b. Confined placental mosaicism and pregnancy outcome: a distinction needs to be made between types 2 and 3. Prenat Diagn 30: 1155-1164.
9. Van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, et al. 2000. Accuracy of abnormal karyotypes after the analysis of both short- and long-term culture of chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn 20: 956-969.
10. Waters JJ, Mann K, Grimsley L, et al. 2007. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS. Prenat Diagn 27: 332-339.