aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 473-478

  Filges, Isabel ^a   Kang, Anjeung ^b   Klug, Vanessa ^a   Wenzel, Friedel ^a   Heinimann, Karl ^a   Tercanli, Sevgi ^b   Miny, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

ACGH; Chorionic villi; CVS; Fetoplacental mosaicism; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHORION VILLUS; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CHROMOSOME 18P; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; CYTOTROPHOBLAST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISOMY; FEMALE; FETOPLACENTAL UNIT; FETUS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE DOSAGE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; ISOCHROMOSOME; MONOSOMY X; MOSAICISM; PLACENTAL MOSAICISM; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRISOMY 18;

ADULT; CHORIONIC VILLI; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 18; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MOSAICISM; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; TRISOMY; TROPHOBLASTS;

EID: 79954824952     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2721     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ballif B, Rorem E, Sundin K, et al. 2006. Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens. Am J Med Genet A 140: 2757-2767.
2. Bi W, Breman A, Venable S, et al. 2008. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH. Prenat Diagn 28: 943-949.
3. Cheung S, Shaw C, Scott D, et al. 2007. Microarray-based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogenetics. Am J Med Genet A 143A: 1679-1686.
4. Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb A, et al. 2009. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Prenat Diagn 29: 1156-1166.
5. Ekelund C, Jørgensen F, Petersen O, Sundberg K, Tabor A. 2008. Impact of a new national screening policy for Down's syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study. BMJ 337: a2547.
6. Friedman J. 2009. High-resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 29: 20-28.
7. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. 1997. European collaborative research mosaicism in CVS (EUCHROMIC)-fetal and extrafetal cell lineages in 192 gestations with CVS mosaicism involving single autosomal trisomy. Am J Med Genet 70: 179-187.
8. Hammer P, Holzgreve W, Karabacak Z, et al. 1991. 'False-negative' and 'false-positive' prenatal cytogenetic results due to 'true' mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 11(2): 133-136.
9. Kalousek DK. 1994. Current topic: confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal development. Placenta 15: 219-230.
10. Kalousek D, Vekemans M. 1996. Confined placental mosaicism. J Med Genet 33: 529-533.
11. Kleeman L, Bianchi D, Shaffer L, et al. 2009. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 29: 1213-1217.
12. Lestou V, Desilets V, Lomax B, et al. 2000. Comparative genomic hybridization: a new approach to screening for intrauterine complete or mosaic aneuploidy. Am J Med Genet 92: 281-284.
13. Lestou V, Lomax B, Barrett I, Kalousek D. 1999. Screening of human placentas for chromosomal mosaicism using comparative genomic hybridization. Teratology 59: 325-330.
14. Milunsky A, Milunsky JM (eds). 2010. Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester; 180-183.
15. Robinson WP, Penaherrera MS, Jiang R, et al. 2010. Assessing the role of placental trisomy in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 30: 1-8.
16. Sahoo T, Cheung S, Ward P, et al. 2006. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 8: 719-727.
17. Scott SA, Cohen N, Brandt T, et al. 2010. Detection of low-level mosaicism and placental mosaicism by oligonucleotide comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 12(2): 85-92.
18. Shaffer L, Coppinger J, Alliman S. 2008. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 28: 789-795.
19. Smith K, Lowther G, Maher E, et al. 1999. The predictive value of findings of the common aneuploidies, trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities at CVS: experience from the ACC U.K. collaborative study. Prenat Diagn 19(9): 817-826.
20. Tyreman M, Abbott K, Willatt L, et al. 2009. High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. J Med Genet 46: 531-541.
21. Van den Veyver I, Patel A, Shaw C, et al. 2009. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 29: 29-39.
22. Waters JJ, Mann K, Grimsley L, et al. 2007. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS. Prenat Diagn 27: 332-339.
23. Wolstenholme J, Rooney DE, Davison EV. 1994. Confined placental mosaicism, IUGR, and adverse pregnancy outcome: a controlled retrospective U.K. collaborative survey. Prenat Diagn 14: 345-361.