Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 4642-4649

  Chang, Ching Hui ^a   Lin, Jyh Jiuan ^b   Lin, Jyh Horng ^b   Chiang, Miao Chen ^b  

^a MING CHUAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAMKANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Multiple criteria analysis; Mutual fund; Performance evaluation; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL RESULTS; EQUITY MUTUAL FUNDS; IDEAL SOLUTIONS; MAHALANOBIS; MINKOWSKI; MINKOWSKI'S DISTANCE; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS; MUTUAL FUNDS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; TOPSIS METHOD;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; INVESTMENTS;

FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 77249106974     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.044     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
2. Chow, W. S. (2002). Multivariate statistical analysis with application of SAS/STAT. (pp. 693-694). Taipei: Best-Wise.
3. Deng H., Yeh C.H., and Willis R.J. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers and Operations Research 27 (2000) 963-973
4. Diakoulaki D., Mavrotas G., and Papayannakis L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers and Operations Research 22 (1995) 763-770
5. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K.S. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications (1981), Springer-Verlag, New York
6. Jensen M.C. The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. Journal of Finance 23 2 (1968) 389-416
7. Lai Y.J., Liu T.Y., and Hwang C.L. TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research 76 (1994) 486-500
8. Lin J.J., Liu C.Y., Chang C.H., and Lin C.H. Extended TOPSIS method and application. Journal of the Chinese Statistical Association 43 3 (2005) 165-187
9. Lin J.J., Chiang M.C., and Chang C.H. A comparison of usual indices and extended TOPSIS methods in mutual funds' performance evaluation. Journal of Statistics & Management Systems 10 6 (2007) 869-883
10. Pendaraki K., Zopounidis C., and Doumpos M. On the construction of mutual fund portfolios: A multi-criteria methodology and an application to the Greek market of equity mutual funds. European Journal of Operational Research 163 2 (2005) 462-481
11. Shannon C.E., and Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication (1947), The University of Illinois Press, Urbana
12. Sharpe W.F. Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business 39 1 (1966) 119-138 (Part 2: Supplement on Security Prices)
13. Sinha, B. K. (2003). Combining Environmental Indicators. working paper. Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Maryland Baltimore County.
14. Treynor J.L. How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review 43 1 (1965) 63-75
15. Wang H.F. Multi-criteria decision analysis (2005), Tsang Hai, Taipei
16. Wu, C. L. (2004). The application of factor analysis and TOPSIS to Taiwanese mutual fund selection. Master thesis, Institute of Management of Technology, College of Management, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
17. Yu P.L. A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management of Science 19 8 (1973) 936-946