The law and economics of monopolization standards

Antitrust Law and Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 82-115

  Hylton, Keith N ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055061119     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781849805285.00011     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Areeda, P. (1981), Antitrust Analysis: Problems, Text, and Cases (3d edn), Boston; Little, Brown.
2. Areeda, P. (1990), 'Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles', Antitrust L.J., 58, 841-54.
3. Areeda, P. & D. Turner (1975), 'Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act', Harv. L. Rev. 88, 697-733.
4. Areeda, P. et al. (2004), Antitrust Analysis: Problems, Text, Cases (6th edn), New York; Aspen Publishers.
5. Bork, R.H. (1978), The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, New York; Basic Books, Inc.
6. Cass, R.A. & K.N. Hylton (1999), 'Preserving Competition: Economic Analysis, Legal Standards, and Microsoft', Geo. Mason L. Rev., 8, 1-40.
7. Cass, R.A. & K.N. Hylton (2001), 'Antitrust Intent', S. Cal. L. Rev., 74, 657-746.
8. Clark, J.M. (1940, June), 'Toward a Concept of Workable Competition', Am. Econ. Rev., 30(2), 241-56.
9. Cooper, J.C., L.M. Froeb, D. O'Brien, and M. Vita (2005), 'Vertical Antitrust Policy as a Problem of Inference', Intn'l. J. Indus. Org., 23(7-8), 639-64.
10. Cotter, T.F. (1999), 'Intellectual Property and the Essential Facilities Doctrine', Antitrust Bull., 44, 211-50.
11. Easterbrook, F.H. (1984), The Limits of Antitrust, Tex. L. Rev., 63, 1-40.
12. Elhauge, E. (2003), 'Defining Better Monopolization Standards', Stan. L. Rev., 56, 253-344.
13. Epstein, R.A. (2004), Cases and Materials on Torts (8th edn), New York: Aspen.
14. Evans, D.S. & A.J. Padilla (2005), 'Designing Antitrust Rules for Assessing Unilateral Practices: A Neo- Chicago Approach', U. Chi. L. Rev., 72, 73-98.
15. Faull, J. & A. Nikpay (eds) (1999), Faull & Nikpay: The EC Law of Competition, New York; Oxford University Press.
16. Gavil, A.I. (2005), 'Exclusionary Distribution Strategies by Dominant Firms: Striking a Better Balance', Antitrust L. J., 72, 3-83, 53.
17. Griffin, C.E. (1951), An Economic Approach to Antitrust Problems, New York; American Enterprise Association.
18. Hylton, K.N. (1991), 'Economic Rents and Essential Facilities', BYU. L. Rev., 1991(3), 1243-1284.
19. Hylton, K.N. (2003), Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution, New York; Cambridge University Press.
20. Hylton, K.N. (2005), 'Section 2 and Article 82: A Comparison of American and European Approaches to Monopolization Law', Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 06- 11, http://ssrn.com/abstract5902655.
21. Hylton, K.N. & M.A. Salinger (2001), 'Tying Law and Policy: A Decision- Theoretic Approach', Antitrust L. J., 69, 469-526.
22. Hylton, K.N. & F. Deng (2007), 'Antitrust Around the World: An Empirical Analysis of the Scope of Competition Laws and Their Effects', Antitrust L. J., 74, 271-341.
23. Hylton, K.N. et al. (2007), 'Antitrust World Reports', http://antitrustworldwiki.com.
24. Kahn, A.E. (1953), 'Standards for Antitrust Policy', Harv. L. Rev., 67, 28-54.
25. Krattenmaker, T. & S.C. Salop (1986), 'Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals' Costs to Achieve Power over Price', Yale L. J., 96(2), 209-94.
26. Lao, M. (2006), 'Defining Exclusionary Conduct under Section 2: The Case for Non- Universal Standards', Fordham International Antitrust Law & Policy, 433-68 (Barry Hawk ed.).
27. Letwin, W. (1965), Law and Economic Policy in America: The Evolution of the Sherman Antitrust Act, Chicago; The University of Chicago, 19.
28. Lipsky, A.B., Jr. & J.G. Sidak (1999), 'Essential Facilities', Stan. L. Rev., 51, 1187-248.
29. Mason, E.S. (1949), 'The Current Status of the Monopoly Problem in the United States', Harv. L. Rev., 62, 1265-85.
30. Melamed, A.D. (2005), 'Exclusionary Conduct Under the Antitrust Laws: Balancing, Sacrifice, and Refusals to Deal', Berkeley Tech. L.J., 20, 1247-68.
31. Oppenheim, S.C. (1952), 'Federal Antitrust Legislation: Guideposts to a Revised National Antitrust Policy', Mich. L. Rev., 50, 1139-244.
32. Posner, R.A. (1975, August), 'The Social Cost of Monopoly and Regulation', J. Pol. Econ., 83(4), 807-28.
33. Posner, R.A. (2001), Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective (2nd edn), Chicago; University of Chicago Press.
34. Robinson, G.O. (2002), 'On Refusing to Deal with Rivals', Cornell L. Rev., 87, 1177-232.
35. Salop, S.C. (2006), 'Exclusionary Conduct, Effect on Consumers, and the Flawed Profit- Sacrifice Standard', Antitrust L.J., 73(2), 311-74.
36. Salop, S.C. & R.C. Romaine (1999), 'Preserving Monopoly: Economic Analysis, Legal Standards and Microsoft', Geo. Mason L. Rev., 7, 617-72
37. Salop, S.C. & D. Scheffman (1983, May), 'Raising Rivals' Costs', Am. Econ. Rev., 73(2), 267-71.
38. Spence, A.M. (1981, Spring), 'The Learning Curve and Competition', Bell J. Econ., 12(1), 49-70.
39. Stigler, G.J. (1942, June), 'The Extent and Bases of Monopoly', Am. Econ. Rev., 32(2) (Supplement), 1-22.
40. Tullock, G. (1967), 'The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft', W. Econ. J., 5, 224-32.
41. Vickers, J. (2005, June), 'Abuse of Market Power', The Economic Journal, 115, F244-F262.
42. Werden, G.J. (2006), 'Identifying Exclusionary Conduct Under Section 2: The "No Economic Sense" Test', Antitrust L. J., 73, 413-34.
43. Williamson, O.E. (1968), 'Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs', Am. Econ. Rev., 58, 18-36.