Bioceramics in ossicular replacement prostheses: A Review

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 169-183

  Wongwiwat, Plawut ^a   Boonma, Apichart ^a   Lee, Yuan Shin ^a   Narayan, Roger J ^b  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b Biomedical Research Imaging Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioceramics; Biomaterials; Middle ear implants

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMATERIALS; CERAMIC MATERIALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; GLASS CERAMICS; HEARING AIDS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PROSTHETICS; WEAR RESISTANCE;

BIOCERAMIC MATERIALS; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; CLINICAL USE; DESIGN FACTORS; MIDDLE EAR IMPLANTS;

BIOCERAMICS;

BIOCERAMICS; BIOGLASS; HYDROXYAPATITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY OSSICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENSITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC IMPLANT; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MIDDLE EAR IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 80055041986     PISSN: 10506934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v21.i2.70     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Colletti V, Carner M, Colletti L. TORP vs round window implant for hearing restoration of patients with extensive ossicular chain defect. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2009;129(4):449-52.
2. Ovsianikov A, Chichkov B, Adunka O, Pillsbury H, Doraiswamy A, Narayan R. Rapid prototyping of ossicular replacement prostheses. Applied Surface Science. 2007;25:6603-7.
3. Zenner HP. Implantable hearing devices: an introduction. In: Jahnke K, editor. Middle earsurgery: recent advances and future directions. New York: Thieme; 2004. p. 141-60.
4. Coffey CS, Lee FS, Lambert PR. Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1650-8.
5. Goldenberg RA, Emmet JR. Current use of implants in middle ear surgery. Otology & Neurotology. 2001;22:145-52.
6. Truy E, Naiman A, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otology & Neurotology. 2007;28:492-8.
7. Schmerber S, Troussier JD, Lavieille J, Nguyen D. Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses. European Archives of Oto Rhino Laryngology. 2006;26:347-54.
8. Fong F, Michael P, Raut V. Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty. Acta Oto-laryngologica. 2010;130:554-8.
9. Linder T, Schlegel C, Demin N, Westhuizen S. Active middle ear implants in patients under going subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the vibrant soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery. Otology & Neurotology. 2008;30:41-7.
10. Bornitz M, Hardtke H, Zahnert T. Evaluation of implantable actuators by means of a middle ear simulation model. Hearing Research. 2010;263:145-51.
11. Grote JJ, Kuypers W, de Groot K. Use of sintered hydroxyapatite in middle ear surgery. ORL: Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties. 1981;43:248-54.
12. De Aza PN, De Aza AH, Pena P, De Aza S. Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Boletin de la Sociedad Espanola de Ceramica y Vidrio. 2007;46:45-55.
13. Rust K, Singleton GW, Antonelli P. Bioglass middle ear prosthesis: long-term results. The American Journal of Otology. 1996;17:371-4.
14. Reck R, Storkel S, Meyer A. Glass-ceramics in middle ear surgery: an 8-year review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1988;523:100-6.
15. Shinohara T, Gyo K, Saiki T, Yanagihara N. Ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite prosthesis: long-term results. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2000;25:287-92.
16. Shea J. Plastipore total ossicular replacement prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 1976;86:239-40.
17. Jahnke K, Plester D, Heimke G. Experience with Al2O3-ceramic middle ear implants. Biomaterials. 1983;4:137-8.
18. Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with the Dornhoffer ossicular replacement prostheses. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:531-6. 1998.
19. Hales NW, Shakir FA, Saunders JE. Titanium middle ear prostheses in staged ossiculoplasty: does mass really matter? American Journal of Otolarynogology. 2007;28:164-7.
20. Moller AR. Hearing: anatomy, physiology, and disorders of the auditory system, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006.
21. Palsson B, Hubbell JA, Plonsey R, Bronzino JD. Tissue engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRCPress; 2000.
22. Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, Hall WC, Lamantia AS, McNamara JO, Williams SM. Neuroscience, 4th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2004.
23. Koike T, Wada H, Kobayashi T. Modeling of the human middle ear using the finite-element method. Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 2002;111:1306-17.
24. Peeples EE, Dixon LK, Buss WR. Genetic analysis of the pinna of the human ear: sex differences in college age adults. The Journal of Heredity. 1985;76:390-2.
25. Gan RZ, Feng B, Sun Q. Three-dimensional elemental modeling of human ear for sound transmission. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2004;32:847-59.
26. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Medical Engineering & Physics. 1998;20:92-102.
27. Chapman SC. Can you hear me now? Understanding vertebrate middle ear development. Frontiers of Bioscience. 2011;16:1675-92.
28. Homma K, Du Y, Shimizu Y, Puria S. Ossicular resonance modes of the human middle ear for bone and air conduction. Acoustical Society of America. 2009;125:968-79.
29. Subha ST, Raman R. Role of impacted cerumen in hearing loss. ENT-Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2006;85:650-3.
30. Tjandra JJ, Clunie GJ, Kay AH, Smith JA. Textbook of surgery, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley Blackwell; 2006.
31. Chasin M. A brief history of middle implant. Hearing Journal. 2008;61:38-40.
32. Traynor RM. Middle ear implant. Retrieved September 29, 2010 from www.middleearimplants.com.
33. Mills R, Wang S, Abel E. In vitro study of a multi-layer piezoelectric crystal attic hearing implant. Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2001;115:359-62.
34. Wang ZG, Abel EW, Mills RP, Liu Y. Assessment of multi-layer piezoelectric actuator technology for middle ear implants. Mechatronics. 2002;12:3-17.
35. Shohet JA. Implantable hearing devices. Retrieved September 29, 2010 from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/860444-overview.
36. Meister H, Walger M, Michenhagen A, Von Wedel H, Stennert E. Standardized measurements of the sound transmission of middle ear implants using a mechanical middle ear model. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 1999;256:122-7.
37. Goode R, Nishihara S. Experimental models of ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 1994;27:663-75.
38. Kelly D, Prendergast P, Blayney A. The effect of prosthesis design on vibration of the reconstructed ossicular chain: a comparative finite element analysis of four prostheses. Otology & Neurotology. 2003;24:11-9.
39. Zenner HP, Stegmaier A, Lehner R, Baumann I, Zimmermann R. Open Tubingen titanium prostheses for ossiculoplasty: a prospective clinical trial. Otology & Neurotology. 2001;22:582-9.
40. Huttenbrink KB. Biomechanical aspects of middle reconstruction. In: Jahnke K, editor. Middle ear surgery: recent advances and future directions. New York: Thieme; 2004. p. 23-51.
41. Legouix JP. Experimental study of bone conduction in ears with mechanical impairment of the ossicles. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.1959;31:1453.
42. Huttenbrink KB. Current status and critical reflections on implantable hearing aids. American Journal of Otology. 1999;20:409-15.
43. More R, Haubold A, Bokros J. Pyrolytic carbon for long term medical implants. In: Ratner B, Hoffman A, Schoen F, Lemons J, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine, San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 170-181.
44. Black J, Hastings G. Handbook of biomaterial properties. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
45. Billotte W. Ceramic biomaterials. In: Wong J, Bronzino, J, editors. Biomaterials, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007. p. 21-34.
46. Blayney A, Romero RJ, Williams K, Guilhaume A, Bagot DM, Portman M. Experimental and clinical aspects of carbon as a middle ear prosthesis. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences. 1986;1:189-97.
47. Hench L. Bioactive ceramics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1988;523: 54-71.
48. Hench LL, Wilson J. Introduction. In: Hench LL, Wilson J, editors. An introduction to bioceramics. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing; 1993. p. 1-24.
49. Brewis C, Orrell J, Yung M. Ceravital revisited: lessons to be learned. Otology & Neurotology. 2003;24:20-3.
50. Thompson I, Hench L. Review paper: mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, glass ceramics and composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 1998; 212: 127-36.
51. LeGeros R, LeGeros J. Dense hydroxyapatite. In: Hench L, Wilson J, editors. An introduction to bioceramics. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing; 1993. p. 139-180.
52. Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphate-based biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials. Journal of Materials Science. 2009;44:2343-87.
53. Zhang Y, Tanner K, Gurav N, Di Silvio L. In vitro osteoblastic response to 30 vol% hydroxyapatite- polyethylene composite. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2007;81A:409-17.
54. Jie W, Yubao L, Weiqun C., Yi Z. A study on nanocomposite of hydroxyapatite and polyamide, Journal of Material Science, 2003;38: 3303-6.
55. Liao JG, Li YB, Zhang L, Zuo Y. Study of nano-hydroxyapatite/polycarbonate composite for bone repair. Materials Science Forum. 2009;620-622:587-90.
56. Zhang X, Li X, H. Fan H, Liu X. Nano-hydroxyapatite/ polymer composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Key Engineering Materials. 2007;330-332:365-8.
57. Huang YX, Ren J, Chen C, Ren TB, Zhou XY. Preparation and properties of poly(lactideco- glycolide) (PLGA)/nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation and rabbit MSCs culture on scaffolds. Journal of Biomaterial Applications. 2008;22:409-32.
58. Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science. 2002;295:1014-7.
59. Rea S, Best S, Bonfield W. Bioactivity of ceramic- polymer composites with varied composition and surface topography. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2004;15:997-1005.
60. Koleganova VA, Bernier SM, Dixon SJ, Rizkalla, AS. Bioactive glass/polymer composite materials with mechanical properties matching those of cortical bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2006;77A:572-9.
61. Kuo MC, Tsai CM, Huang JC, Chen M. PEEK composites reinforced by nano-sized SiO2 and Al2O3 particulates. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2005;90:185-95.
62. Wang A, Lin R, Stark C, Dumbleton JH. Suitability and limitations of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites as bearing surfaces for total joint replacements. Wear. 1999;225- 229:724-7.
63. Wang A, Lin R, Polineni VK, Essner A, Stark C, Dumbleton JH. Carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone composite as a bearing surface for total hip replacement. Tribology International. 1998;31:661-7.
64. Newaz GM. Advances in thermoplastic matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1989.
65. Spear R, Cameron R. Carbon nanotubes for orthopaedic implants. International Journal of Material Forming. 2008;1:127-33.
66. Li H, Zhao N, Liu Y, Liang C, Shi C, Dua X, Li J. A fabrication and properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced Fe/hydroxyapatite composites by in situ chemical vapor deposition. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2008;39: 1128-32.
67. Lua X, Wang H, Xiac S, Wang JX, Wenge J. In situ growth of carbon nanotubes in hydroxyapatite matrix by chemical vapor deposition. Advanced Materials Research. 2009;79-82:1671-4.
68. Xua JL, Khora KA, Sui JJ, Chen WN. Preparation and characterization of a novel hydroxyapatite/ carbon nanotubes composite and its interaction with osteoblast-like cells. Materials Science and Engineering C. 2009;29:44-9.
69. Yamamoto G, Omori M, Hashida T, Kimura H. A novel structure for carbon nanotube reinforced alumina composites with improved mechanical properties. Nanotechnology. 2008;19:315708.